Patients’ perception of colonoscopy and acceptance of colonoscopy based IBD related colorectal cancer surveillance

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Eve Braithwaite ◽  
Jenelyn Carbonell ◽  
John S. Kane ◽  
David Gracie ◽  
Christian P. Selinger
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance

Predicting adherence to colorectal cancer surveillance after plypectomy

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A602-A602
Author(s):  
S RAWL ◽  
S BLACKBURN ◽  
L HACKWARD ◽  
N FINEBERG ◽  
T IMPERIALE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance

Colorectal cancer surveillance in patients with ulcerative colitis

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 689-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Jonsson ◽  
L. Åhsgren ◽  
L. O. Andersson ◽  
R. Stenling ◽  
J. Rutegåd
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance

Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 3108-3113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie M. Tjaden ◽  
Jessica A. Hause ◽  
Daniel Berger ◽  
Samantha K. Duveneck ◽  
Shriram M. Jakate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rate ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Surveillance Colonoscopy ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance

Sizing of Polyp Illustrations Differs by Endoscopists’ Gender and Improves With a Measurement Reference

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabiha Shamsi ◽  
Aasma Shaukat ◽  
Sofia Halperin-Goldstein ◽  
Joshua Colton
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Demographic Groups ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rates ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance ◽  
The Impact

Colorectal cancer surveillance intervals by colonoscopy are based on the size and number of polyps removed. Evidence suggests endoscopists’ estimation of polyp size is often inaccurate, but the differences by endoscopists’ characteristics have not been reported. This study assesses endoscopists’ accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations, the effect of endoscopists’ characteristics, and the impact of having a measurement reference. Endoscopists in a community-based, gastroenterology practice estimated the size of several illustrations in a booklet. One month later, they estimated the size of illustrations with a provided measurement reference. Accuracy was defined as no difference between estimated and actual value. Endoscopists were accurate in sizing only 15% of the time, with a tendency toward undersizing. Female endoscopists, those with less than 10 years in practice and those with lower adenoma detection rates, were more likely to undersize polyps. Accuracy of measuring the polyp illustrations increased to 50% ( p < .01) with the measurement reference. The improvement in accuracy was seen across endoscopists’ demographic groups. Endoscopists had poor accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations. Almost universally, endoscopists tended to undersize the polyp illustrations. Accuracy improved significantly with the use of a polyp-measuring guide, particularly when considering important surveillance thresholds of 5 and 10 mm.

Sa1065 COLORECTAL CANCER SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE IN THE COLONOSCOPY SUITE

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. AB161
Author(s):  
Ahmad Abu-Heija ◽  
Bashar Mohamad ◽  
Pradeep R. Kathi ◽  
Mohammed Mustafa Nayeem ◽  
Mowyad Khalid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Guideline Compliance ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document