scholarly journals Automated plant identification using artificial neural network and support vector machine

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon Jye Kho ◽  
Sugumaran Manickam ◽  
Sorayya Malek ◽  
Mogeeb Mosleh ◽  
Sarinder Kaur Dhillon
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Artificial Neural Network ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Plant Identification ◽  
Artificial Neural

scholarly journals Pioneer dataset and recognition of Handwritten Pashto characters using Convolution Neural Networks

2020 ◽  
pp. 002029402096482
Author(s):  
Sulaiman Khan ◽  
Abdul Hafeez ◽  
Hazrat Ali ◽  
Shah Nazir ◽  
Anwar Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Artificial Neural Network ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Recognition Rate ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Convolution Neural Network ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Artificial Neural

This paper presents an efficient OCR system for the recognition of offline Pashto isolated characters. The lack of an appropriate dataset makes it challenging to match against a reference and perform recognition. This research work addresses this problem by developing a medium-size database that comprises 4488 samples of handwritten Pashto character; that can be further used for experimental purposes. In the proposed OCR system the recognition task is performed using convolution neural network. The performance analysis of the proposed OCR system is validated by comparing its results with artificial neural network and support vector machine based on zoning feature extraction technique. The results of the proposed experiments shows an accuracy of 56% for the support vector machine, 78% for artificial neural network, and 80.7% for the proposed OCR system. The high recognition rate shows that the OCR system based on convolution neural network performs best among the used techniques.

scholarly journals Predicting Rainfall-Induced Soil Erosion Based on a Hybridization of Adaptive Differential Evolution and Support Vector Machine Classification

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Tuan Vu Dinh ◽  
Hieu Nguyen ◽  
Xuan-Linh Tran ◽  
Nhat-Duc Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Artificial Neural Network ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Soil Erosion ◽  
Differential Evolution ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Adaptive Differential Evolution ◽  
Artificial Neural

Soil erosion induced by rainfall is a critical problem in many regions in the world, particularly in tropical areas where the annual rainfall amount often exceeds 2000 mm. Predicting soil erosion is a challenging task, subjecting to variation of soil characteristics, slope, vegetation cover, land management, and weather condition. Conventional models based on the mechanism of soil erosion processes generally provide good results but are time-consuming due to calibration and validation. The goal of this study is to develop a machine learning model based on support vector machine (SVM) for soil erosion prediction. The SVM serves as the main prediction machinery establishing a nonlinear function that maps considered influencing factors to accurate predictions. In addition, in order to improve the accuracy of the model, the history-based adaptive differential evolution with linear population size reduction and population-wide inertia term (L-SHADE-PWI) is employed to find an optimal set of parameters for SVM. Thus, the proposed method, named L-SHADE-PWI-SVM, is an integration of machine learning and metaheuristic optimization. For the purpose of training and testing the method, a dataset consisting of 236 samples of soil erosion in Northwest Vietnam is collected with 10 influencing factors. The training set includes 90% of the original dataset; the rest of the dataset is reserved for assessing the generalization capability of the model. The experimental results indicate that the newly developed L-SHADE-PWI-SVM method is a competitive soil erosion predictor with superior performance statistics. Most importantly, L-SHADE-PWI-SVM can achieve a high classification accuracy rate of 92%, which is much better than that of backpropagation artificial neural network (87%) and radial basis function artificial neural network (78%).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document