scholarly journals Malaria circumsporozoite protein binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans associated with the surface membrane of hepatocytes.

1993 ◽  
Vol 177 (5) ◽  
pp. 1287-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
U Frevert ◽  
P Sinnis ◽  
C Cerami ◽  
W Shreffler ◽  
B Takacs ◽  
...  

During feeding by infected mosquitoes, malaria sporozoites are injected into the host's bloodstream and enter hepatocytes within minutes. The remarkable target cell specificity of this parasite may be explained by the presence of receptors for the region II-plus of the circumsporozoite protein (CS) on the basolateral domain of the plasma membrane of hepatocytes. We have now identified these receptors as heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). The binding of CS to the receptors is abolished by heparitinase treatment, indicating that the recognition of region II-plus is via the glycosaminoglycan chains. We have purified and partially characterized the CS-binding HSPGs from HepG2 cells. They have a molecular weight of 400,000-700,000, are tightly associated with the plasma membrane, and are released from the cell surface by very mild trypsinization, a property which the CS receptors share with the syndecan family of proteoglycans.

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiya V Snigireva ◽  
Veronika V Vrublevskaya ◽  
Vladimir N Afanasyev ◽  
Oleg S Morenkov

Author(s):  
U. Frevert ◽  
S. Sinnis ◽  
C. Cerami ◽  
V. Nussenzweig

Malaria sporozoites, which invade hepatocytes within minutes after transmission by an infected mosquito, are covered with the circumsporozoite (CS) protein, which in all Plasmodium species contains the conserved region II-plus. This region is also found as a cell-adhesive motif in a variety of host proteins like thrombospondin, properdin and the terminal complement components.The CS protein with its region II-plus specifically binds to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) on the basolateral surface of hepatocytes in the space of Disse (FIG. 1), to certain basolateral cell membranes and basement membranes of the kidney (FIG. 2) as well as to heparin in the granules of connective tissue mast cells. The distribution of the HSPG receptors for the CS protein was examined by incubation of Lowicryl K4M or LR White sections of liver and kidney tissue with the recombinant CS ligand, whose binding sites were detected with a monoclonal anti-CS antibody and protein A gold.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara E. Stopschinski ◽  
Brandon B. Holmes ◽  
Gregory M. Miller ◽  
Jaime Vaquer-Alicea ◽  
Linda C. Hsieh-Wilson ◽  
...  

AbstractTranscellular propagation of aggregate “seeds” has been proposed to mediate progression of neurodegenerative diseases in tauopathies and α-synucleinopathies. We have previously determined that tau and α-synuclein aggregates bind heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on the cell surface. This mediates uptake and intracellular seeding. The specificity and mode of binding to HSPGs has been unknown. We used modified heparins to determine the size and sulfation requirements of glycosaminoglycan (GAGs) binding to aggregates in biochemical and cell uptake and seeding assays. Aggregates of tau require a precise GAG architecture with defined sulfate moieties in the N- and 6-O-positions, whereas α-synuclein and Aβ rely slightly more on overall charge on the GAGs. To determine the genetic requirements for aggregate uptake, we individually knocked out the major genes of the HSPG synthesis pathway using CRISPR/Cas9 in HEK293T cells. Knockout of EXT1, EXT2 and EXTL3, N-sulfotransferase (NDST1), and 6-O-sulfotransferase (HS6ST2) significantly reduced tau uptake. α-Synuclein was not sensitive to HS6ST2 knockout. Good correlation between pharmacologic and genetic manipulation of GAG binding by tau and α-synuclein indicates specificity that may help elucidate a path to mechanism-based inhibition of transcellular propagation of pathology.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana A. Soares ◽  
Felipe C. O. B. Teixeira ◽  
Miguel Fontes ◽  
Ana Lúcia Arêas ◽  
Marcelo G. Leal ◽  
...  

The metastatic disease is one of the main consequences of tumor progression, being responsible for most cancer-related deaths worldwide. This review intends to present and discuss data on the relationship between integrins and heparan sulfate proteoglycans in health and cancer progression. Integrins are a family of cell surface transmembrane receptors, responsible for cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesion. Integrins’ main functions include cell adhesion, migration, and survival. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are cell surface molecules that play important roles as cell receptors, cofactors, and overall direct or indirect contributors to cell organization. Both molecules can act in conjunction to modulate cell behavior and affect malignancy. In this review, we will discuss the different contexts in which various integrins, such asα5,αV,β1, andβ3, interact with HSPGs species, such as syndecans and perlecans, affecting tissue homeostasis.


2006 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 061206073830001
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Noguchi ◽  
Michiko Ueda ◽  
Shinichi Matsumoto ◽  
Naoya Kobayashi ◽  
Shuji Hayashi

2002 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 1530-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Fleckenstein ◽  
James T. Holland ◽  
David L. Hasty

ABSTRACT We have previously shown that enterotoxigenic invasion protein A (Tia), a 25-kDa outer membrane protein encoded on an apparent pathogenicity island of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strain H10407, mediates attachment to and invasion into cultured human gastrointestinal epithelial cells. The epithelial cell receptor(s) for Tia has not been identified. Here we show that Tia interacts with cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Recombinant E. coli expressing Tia mediated invasion into wild-type epithelial cell lines but not invasion into proteoglycan-deficient cells. Furthermore, wild-type eukaryotic cells, but not proteoglycan-deficient eukaryotic cells, attached to immobilized polyhistidine-tagged recombinant Tia (rTia). Binding of epithelial cells to immobilized rTia was inhibited by exogenous heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans but not by hyaluronic acid, dermatan sulfate, or chondroitin sulfate. Similarly, pretreatment of eukaryotic cells with heparinase I, but not pretreatment of eukaryotic cells with chrondroitinase ABC, inhibited attachment to rTia. In addition, we also observed heparin binding to both immobilized rTia and recombinant E. coli expressing Tia. Heparin binding was inhibited by a synthetic peptide representing a surface loop of Tia, as well as by antibodies directed against this peptide. Additional studies indicated that Tia, as a prokaryotic heparin binding protein, may also interact via sulfated proteoglycan molecular bridges with a number of mammalian heparan sulfate binding proteins. These findings suggest that the binding of Tia to host epithelial cells is mediated at least in part through heparan sulfate proteoglycans and that ETEC belongs on the growing list of pathogens that utilize these ubiquitous cell surface molecules as receptors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document