Feasibility Testing of an Emergency Department Screening Tool To Identify Older Adults Appropriate for Palliative Care Consultation

112 Background: Patients with advanced cancer are at high risk for emergency department (ED) and hospital utilization, which is distressing and costly. Palliative care consultation and symptom management clinics have been shown to decrease ED and hospital utilization, but the frequency and composition of these interventions is still being delineated. More evaluation is needed to determine practical approaches to implementing interdisciplinary management of distress for patients with advanced cancer in the community setting. This retrospective review evaluates healthcare utilization with respect to support services provided in our community based cancer institute. Methods: 157 patients with advanced cancer of lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary or gynecologic origin diagnosed January 2015-December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Descriptive data including demographics, disease characteristics, palliative care consultation, support services utilized and ED visits/hospitalizations were collected for 12 months, or to date of death. Support services included physician assistant–led symptom management, nurse navigator, social worker, nutrition, financial counselor, chaplain, and oncology clinical counselor. Support service referrals were made based on identified needs. Severe disease was defined as death within 6 months of diagnosis. Results: Patients with severe disease had a mean of 6 ED visits per year, significantly greater than patients with non-severe disease (p < 0.001). Patients with severe disease also had more contacts with support services per year (30.3 vs 9.1, p < 0.001). A palliative care consult was placed in 50% of patients with severe disease, and 23% in patients with non-severe disease (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer have evidence of significant needs as reflected by high healthcare utilization in the last 6 months of life. As needed involvement of support services correlated with severity of disease but did not result in decreased ED utilization or hospitalization. This suggests that availability of support services alone is not a feasible strategy to impact unplanned hospitalizations and ED visits.

Download Full-text

Development and implementation of a palliative care consultation tool

Palliative & Supportive Care ◽

10.1017/s1478951511000848 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 171-175 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Alexei Trout ◽

Kenneth L. Kirsh ◽

John F. Peppin

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Screening Tool ◽

Average Length ◽

Hospital Costs ◽

Initial Attempt ◽

Palliative Care Consultation ◽

Time Period ◽

Care Consultation ◽

Chi Square Analysis

AbstractObjective:Palliative care services are becoming more commonplace in hospitals and have the potential to reduce hospital costs through length of stay reduction and remediation of symptoms. However, there has been little systematic attempt to identify when a palliative care consultation should be triggered in a hospital, and there is some evidence that these services are under-utilized and not fully understood.Method:In an initial attempt to address when a consultation might be appropriate, we attempted to pilot test a novel palliative care screening tool to help guide clinician judgment in this regard. A one-page, face-valid instrument was developed using expert opinion.Results:The sample comprised 33 men (44.6%) and 41 women (55.4%) with an average age of 63.4 years (SD = 13.8) and an average length of stay of 22.7 days (SD = 10.1). The most significant symptom was pain, indicated as moderate-to-severe in 23 patients (31%). This was followed by fatigue (n = 10, 13.5%) and nausea (n = 6, 8.1%). At unit entry, 20 patients (33%) had moderate or severe pain. Upon discharge, this number had been reduced to 12/60 (20%). Chi-Square analysis showed a significant decrease in pain rankings overall (χ2 = 36.3, p < 0.0001). The average total tool score was 7.5 (SD = 3.1). Using an initial threshold of 12 to trigger a palliative care referral, 64 patients (86.5%) would not have received a referral and 10 (13.5%) would have. Of these 10 patients, 2 (20%) did not receive a palliative care consultation while they were hospitalized.Significance of results:The tool we developed increased consultations over the time period in which it was used, compared with the same time period 1 year prior. Although the threshold developed for triggering referrals seemed artificially high, the implementation of the screening tool did increase referrals.

Download Full-text

Palliative care in the emergency department: A survey assessment of patient and provider perspectives

Palliative Medicine ◽

10.1177/0269216320942453 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 34 (9) ◽

pp. 1279-1285

Author(s):

Emily J Woods ◽

Alexander D Ginsburg ◽

Fernanda Bellolio ◽

Laura E Walker

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Emergency Medicine ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Response Rate ◽

Healthcare Providers ◽

Care Utilization ◽

Provider Perspectives ◽

Palliative Care Consultation ◽

Care Consultation ◽

Emergency Department Patients

Background: Palliative care has been identified as an area of low outpatient referral from our emergency department, yet palliative care has been shown to improve the quality of patient’s lives. Aim: This study investigates both provider and patient perspectives on palliative care for the purpose of identifying barriers to increased palliative care utilization within our healthcare system. Design: Two surveys were developed, one for patients/caregivers and one for healthcare providers. Setting/participants: This was a single-center study completed at a quaternary academic emergency department. A survey was sent to emergency medicine providers with 47% response rate. Research staff approached Emergency Department patients who had been identified to be high risk to fill out paper surveys with 76% response rate. Results: Only 28% of patients had already undergone palliative care, with an additional 25% interested in palliative care. Nearly half of the patients felt that they needed more resources to prevent hospital visits. Patients identified low understanding of palliative care and difficulty accessing appointments as barriers to consultation. Among providers, 98% indicated that they had patients who would benefit from palliative care. A majority of providers highlighted patient understanding of palliative care and access to appointments as barriers to palliative care. Notably, 52% of providers reported that emergency medicine provider knowledge was a barrier to palliative care consultation. Conclusions: Despite emergency department patients’ self-identified need for resources and emergency medicine providers’ recognition of patients who would benefit from palliative care, few patients receive palliative care consultation.

Download Full-text

Outcomes Associated With a Nurse-Driven Palliative Care Screening Tool in the Intensive Care Unit

Critical Care Nurse ◽

10.4037/ccn2020702 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 40 (3) ◽

pp. 23-29

Author(s):

Kim Martz ◽

Jenny Alderden ◽

Rick Bassett ◽

Dawn Swick

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Screening Tool ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Discharge Disposition ◽

Palliative Care Consultation ◽

Care Consultation ◽

To Receive

Background Access to specialty palliative care delivery in the intensive care unit is inconsistent across institutions. The intensive care unit at the study institution uses a screening tool to identify patients likely to benefit from specialty palliative care, yet little is known about outcomes associated with the use of screening tools. Objective To identify outcomes associated with specialty palliative care referral among patients with critical illness. Methods Records of 112 patients with positive results on palliative care screening were retrospectively reviewed to compare outcomes between patients who received a specialty palliative care consult and those who did not. Primary outcome measures were length of stay, discharge disposition, and escalation of care. Results Sixty-five patients (58%) did not receive a palliative care consult. No significant differences were found in length of hospital or intensive care unit stay. Most patients who experienced mechanical ventilation did not receive a palliative care consultation (χ2 = 5.14, P = .02). Patients who were discharged to home were also less likely to receive a consult (χ2 = 4.1, P = .04), whereas patients who were discharged to hospice were more likely to receive a consult (χ2 = 19.39, P < .001). Conclusions Unmet needs exist for specialty palliative care. Understanding the methods of identifying patients for specialty palliative care and providing them with such care is critically important. Future research is needed to elucidate the factors providers use in their decisions to order or defer specialty palliative care consultation.

Download Full-text