scholarly journals Protein–Protein Interactions Governing Septin Heteropentamer Assembly and Septin Filament Organization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 4568-4583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Versele ◽  
Björn Gullbrand ◽  
Mark J. Shulewitz ◽  
Victor J. Cid ◽  
Shirin Bahmanyar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Microscopic Analysis ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Septin Filament

Mitotic yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells express five related septins (Cdc3, Cdc10, Cdc11, Cdc12, and Shs1) that form a cortical filamentous collar at the mother-bud neck necessary for normal morphogenesis and cytokinesis. All five possess an N-terminal GTPase domain and, except for Cdc10, a C-terminal extension (CTE) containing a predicted coiled coil. Here, we show that the CTEs of Cdc3 and Cdc12 are essential for their association and for the function of both septins in vivo. Cdc10 interacts with a Cdc3–Cdc12 complex independently of the CTE of either protein. In contrast to Cdc3 and Cdc12, the Cdc11 CTE, which recruits the nonessential septin Shs1, is dispensable for its function in vivo. In addition, Cdc11 forms a stoichiometric complex with Cdc12, independent of its CTE. Reconstitution of various multiseptin complexes and electron microscopic analysis reveal that Cdc3, Cdc11, and Cdc12 are all necessary and sufficient for septin filament formation, and presence of Cdc10 causes filament pairing. These data provide novel insights about the connectivity among the five individual septins in functional septin heteropentamers and the organization of septin filaments.

scholarly journals Yeast Surface Two-hybrid for Quantitative in Vivo Detection of Protein-Protein Interactions via the Secretory Pathway

2009 ◽  
Vol 284 (24) ◽  
pp. 16369-16376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuebo Hu ◽  
Sungkwon Kang ◽  
Xiaoyue Chen ◽  
Charles B. Shoemaker ◽  
Moonsoo M. Jin
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Affinity Maturation ◽  
Antibody Binding ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Yeast Surface ◽  
Two Hybrid

A quantitative in vivo method for detecting protein-protein interactions will enhance our understanding of protein interaction networks and facilitate affinity maturation as well as designing new interaction pairs. We have developed a novel platform, dubbed “yeast surface two-hybrid (YS2H),” to enable a quantitative measurement of pairwise protein interactions via the secretory pathway by expressing one protein (bait) anchored to the cell wall and the other (prey) in soluble form. In YS2H, the prey is released either outside of the cells or remains on the cell surface by virtue of its binding to the bait. The strength of their interaction is measured by antibody binding to the epitope tag appended to the prey or direct readout of split green fluorescence protein (GFP) complementation. When two α-helices forming coiled coils were expressed as a pair of prey and bait, the amount of the prey in complex with the bait progressively decreased as the affinity changes from 100 pm to 10 μm. With GFP complementation assay, we were able to discriminate a 6-log difference in binding affinities in the range of 100 pm to 100 μm. The affinity estimated from the level of antibody binding to fusion tags was in good agreement with that measured in solution using a surface plasmon resonance technique. In contrast, the level of GFP complementation linearly increased with the on-rate of coiled coil interactions, likely because of the irreversible nature of GFP reconstitution. Furthermore, we demonstrate the use of YS2H in exploring the nature of antigen recognition by antibodies and activation allostery in integrins and in isolating heavy chain-only antibodies against botulinum neurotoxin.

GRR1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for glucose repression and encodes a protein with leucine-rich repeats

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 5101-5112
Author(s):  
J S Flick ◽  
M Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Glucose Repression ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Primary Response ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Fractionation ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose leads to repression of transcription of many genes required for alternative carbohydrate metabolism. The GRR1 gene appears to be of central importance to the glucose repression mechanism, because mutations in GRR1 result in a pleiotropic loss of glucose repression (R. Bailey and A. Woodword, Mol. Gen. Genet. 193:507-512, 1984). We have isolated the GRR1 gene and determined that null mutants are viable and display a number of growth defects in addition to the loss of glucose repression. Surprisingly, grr1 mutations convert SUC2, normally a glucose-repressed gene, into a glucose-induced gene. GRR1 encodes a protein of 1,151 amino acids that is expressed constitutively at low levels in yeast cells. GRR1 protein contains 12 tandem repeats of a sequence similar to leucine-rich motifs found in other proteins that may mediate protein-protein interactions. Indeed, cell fractionation studies are consistent with this view, suggesting that GRR1 protein is tightly associated with a particulate protein fraction in yeast extracts. The combined genetic and molecular data are consistent with the idea that GRR1 protein is a primary response element in the glucose repression pathway and is required for the generation or interpretation of the signal that induces glucose repression.

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Tool to Investigate Plant Potassium and Sodium Transporters

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonella Locascio ◽  
Nuria Andrés-Colás ◽  
José Miguel Mulet ◽  
Lynne Yenush
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Model System ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Alkali Cations ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Sodium Transporters ◽  
Adverse Environmental Conditions ◽  
Sodium And Potassium

Sodium and potassium are two alkali cations abundant in the biosphere. Potassium is essential for plants and its concentration must be maintained at approximately 150 mM in the plant cell cytoplasm including under circumstances where its concentration is much lower in soil. On the other hand, sodium must be extruded from the plant or accumulated either in the vacuole or in specific plant structures. Maintaining a high intracellular K+/Na+ ratio under adverse environmental conditions or in the presence of salt is essential to maintain cellular homeostasis and to avoid toxicity. The baker’s yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has been used to identify and characterize participants in potassium and sodium homeostasis in plants for many years. Its utility resides in the fact that the electric gradient across the membrane and the vacuoles is similar to plants. Most plant proteins can be expressed in yeast and are functional in this unicellular model system, which allows for productive structure-function studies for ion transporting proteins. Moreover, yeast can also be used as a high-throughput platform for the identification of genes that confer stress tolerance and for the study of protein–protein interactions. In this review, we summarize advances regarding potassium and sodium transport that have been discovered using the yeast model system, the state-of-the-art of the available techniques and the future directions and opportunities in this field.

scholarly journals Protein-protein interactions in the synaptonemal complex.

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tarsounas ◽  
R E Pearlman ◽  
P J Gasser ◽  
M S Park ◽  
P B Moens
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Late Prophase ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Heterotypic Interactions ◽  
Two Hybrid ◽  
Homotypic Interactions

In mammalian systems, an approximately M(r) 30,000 Cor1 protein has been identified as a major component of the meiotic prophase chromosome cores, and a M(r) 125,000 Syn1 protein is present between homologue cores where they are synapsed and form the synaptonemal complex (SC). Immunolocalization of these proteins during meiosis suggests possible homo- and heterotypic interactions between the two as well as possible interactions with yet unrecognized proteins. We used the two-hybrid system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to detect possible protein-protein associations. Segments of hamsters Cor1 and Syn1 proteins were tested in various combinations for homo- and heterotypic interactions. In the cause of Cor1, homotypic interactions involve regions capable of coiled-coil formation, observation confirmed by in vitro affinity coprecipitation experiments. The two-hybrid assay detects no interaction of Cor1 protein with central and C-terminal fragments of Syn1 protein and no homotypic interactions involving these fragments of Syn1. Hamster Cor1 and Syn1 proteins both associate with the human ubiquitin-conjugation enzyme Hsubc9 as well as with the hamster Ubc9 homologue. The interactions between SC proteins and the Ubc9 protein may be significant for SC disassembly, which coincides with the repulsion of homologs by late prophase I, and also for the termination of sister centromere cohesiveness at anaphase II.

scholarly journals GRR1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for glucose repression and encodes a protein with leucine-rich repeats.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 5101-5112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Flick ◽  
M Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Glucose Repression ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Primary Response ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Fractionation ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose leads to repression of transcription of many genes required for alternative carbohydrate metabolism. The GRR1 gene appears to be of central importance to the glucose repression mechanism, because mutations in GRR1 result in a pleiotropic loss of glucose repression (R. Bailey and A. Woodword, Mol. Gen. Genet. 193:507-512, 1984). We have isolated the GRR1 gene and determined that null mutants are viable and display a number of growth defects in addition to the loss of glucose repression. Surprisingly, grr1 mutations convert SUC2, normally a glucose-repressed gene, into a glucose-induced gene. GRR1 encodes a protein of 1,151 amino acids that is expressed constitutively at low levels in yeast cells. GRR1 protein contains 12 tandem repeats of a sequence similar to leucine-rich motifs found in other proteins that may mediate protein-protein interactions. Indeed, cell fractionation studies are consistent with this view, suggesting that GRR1 protein is tightly associated with a particulate protein fraction in yeast extracts. The combined genetic and molecular data are consistent with the idea that GRR1 protein is a primary response element in the glucose repression pathway and is required for the generation or interpretation of the signal that induces glucose repression.

scholarly journals Coordination of RNA and protein condensation by the P granule protein MEG-3

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Schmidt ◽  
Andrea Putnam ◽  
Dominique Rasoloson ◽  
Geraldine Seydoux
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Intrinsically Disordered ◽  
Disordered Protein ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

ABSTRACTGerm granules are RNA-protein condensates in germ cells. The mechanisms that drive germ granule assembly are not fully understood. MEG-3 is an intrinsically-disordered protein required for germ (P) granule assembly in C. elegans. MEG-3 forms gel-like condensates on liquid condensates assembled by PGL proteins. MEG-3 is related to the GCNA family and contains an N-terminal disordered region (IDR) and a predicted ordered C-terminus featuring an HMG-like motif (HMGL). Using in vitro and in vivo experiments, we find the MEG-3 C-terminus is necessary and sufficient to build MEG-3/PGL co-condensates independent of RNA. The HMGL domain is required for high affinity MEG-3/PGL binding in vitro and for assembly of MEG-3/PGL co-condensates in vivo. The MEG-3 IDR binds RNA in vitro and is required but not sufficient to recruit RNA to P granules. Our findings suggest that P granule assembly depends in part on protein-protein interactions that drive condensation independent of RNA.

scholarly journals Analysis of the SWI4/SWI6 protein complex, which directs G1/S-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1069-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Sidorova ◽  
L Breeden
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Specific Complex ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
The Stability

SWI4 and SWI6 play a crucial role in START-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SWI4 and SWI6 form a specific complex on the SCB (SWI4/6-dependent cell cycle box) sequences which have been found in the promoters of HO and G1 cyclin genes. Overproduction of SWI4 eliminates the SWI6 dependency of HO transcription in vivo and results in a new SWI6-independent, SCB-specific complex in vitro, which is heterogeneous and reacts with SWI4 antibodies. The C terminus of SWI4 is not required for SWI6-independent binding of SWI4 to SCB sequences, but it is necessary and sufficient for association with SWI6. Both SWI4 and SWI6 contain two copies of a 33-amino-acid TPLH repeat, which has been implicated in protein-protein interactions in other proteins. These repeats are not required for the SWI4-SWI6 association. Alanine substitutions in both TPLH repeats of SWI6 reduce its activity but do not affect the stability of the protein or its association with SWI4. However, these mutations reduce the ability of the SWI4/6 complex to bind DNA. Deletion of the lucine zipper motif in SWI6 also allows SWI4/6 complex formation, but it eliminates the DNA-binding ability of the SWI4/6 complex. This indicates that the integrity of two different regions of SWI6 is required for DNA binding by the SWI4/6 complex. From these data, we propose that the sequence-specific DNA-binding domain resides in SWI4 but that SWI6 controls the accessibility of this domain in the SWI4/6 complex.

Analysis of the SWI4/SWI6 protein complex, which directs G1/S-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1069-1077
Author(s):  
J Sidorova ◽  
L Breeden
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Specific Complex ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
The Stability

SWI4 and SWI6 play a crucial role in START-specific transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SWI4 and SWI6 form a specific complex on the SCB (SWI4/6-dependent cell cycle box) sequences which have been found in the promoters of HO and G1 cyclin genes. Overproduction of SWI4 eliminates the SWI6 dependency of HO transcription in vivo and results in a new SWI6-independent, SCB-specific complex in vitro, which is heterogeneous and reacts with SWI4 antibodies. The C terminus of SWI4 is not required for SWI6-independent binding of SWI4 to SCB sequences, but it is necessary and sufficient for association with SWI6. Both SWI4 and SWI6 contain two copies of a 33-amino-acid TPLH repeat, which has been implicated in protein-protein interactions in other proteins. These repeats are not required for the SWI4-SWI6 association. Alanine substitutions in both TPLH repeats of SWI6 reduce its activity but do not affect the stability of the protein or its association with SWI4. However, these mutations reduce the ability of the SWI4/6 complex to bind DNA. Deletion of the lucine zipper motif in SWI6 also allows SWI4/6 complex formation, but it eliminates the DNA-binding ability of the SWI4/6 complex. This indicates that the integrity of two different regions of SWI6 is required for DNA binding by the SWI4/6 complex. From these data, we propose that the sequence-specific DNA-binding domain resides in SWI4 but that SWI6 controls the accessibility of this domain in the SWI4/6 complex.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of STE5 in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Application of a Differential Interaction Trap Assay for Examining Protein-Protein Interactions

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Inouye ◽  
Namrita Dhillon ◽  
Tim Durfee ◽  
Patricia C Zambryski ◽  
Jeremy Thorner
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Mapk Cascade ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein

Ste5 is essential for the yeast mating pheromone response pathway and is thought to function as a scaffold that organizes the components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade. A new method was developed to isolate missense mutations in Ste5 that differentially affect the ability of Ste5 to interact with either of two MAPK cascade constituents, the MEKK (Ste11) and the MEK (Ste7). Mutations that affect association with Ste7 or with Ste11 delineate discrete regions of Ste5 that are critical for each interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis, examining the binding in vitro of Ste5 to Ste11, Ste7, Ste4 (G protein, β subunit), and Fus3 (MAPK), confirmed that each mutation specifically affects the interaction of Ste5 with only one protein. When expressed in a ste5Δ cell, mutant Ste5 proteins that are defective in their ability to interact with either Ste11 or Ste7 result in a markedly reduced mating proficiency. One mutation that clearly weakened (but did not eliminate) interaction of Ste5 with Ste7 permitted mating at wild-type efficiency, indicating that an efficacious signal is generated even when Ste5 associates with only a small fraction of (or only transiently with) Ste7. Ste5 mutants defective in association with Ste11 or Ste7 showed strong interallelic complementation when co-expressed, suggesting that the functional form of Ste5 in vivo is an oligomer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document