Impact of Financial Services Trade Liberalization on Capital Flows: The Case of China's Banking Sector1

Author(s):  
Li-Gang Liu ◽  
Elvira Kurmanalieva
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabia Khatun ◽  
Jagadish Prasad Bist

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between financial development, openness in financial services trade and economic growth in BRICS countries for the period 1990–2012. Design/methodology/approach An index for financial development has been constructed using principal component analysis technique by including banking sector development, stock market development, bond market development and insurance sector development. For the robustness of the result, the long-run cointegrating relationship amongst the variables has been analyzed. Findings Overall financial development has a positive and significant impact on economic growth. To take the full advantage of openness in financial services trade, countries need to put more emphasis on the development of their stock markets, bond markets and the insurance sector. The result shows that openness in financial services trade has a positive impact on economic growth when the stock market, bond market and insurance sector are included in the system. Research limitations/implications The policy implication of the findings is that policymakers should focus more on developing all four areas of finance to get the full benefit of the financial system on the process of economic growth. Originality/value The authors have constructed the better indicators of financial development in the case of BRICS economies. Most of the studies in BRICS economies have measured the development of the financial sector as either banking sector development or stock market development. However, the present study includes all four areas of finance (banking sector development, stock market development, insurance sector development and bond market development) into account.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Indira M. Hapsari ◽  
Donald MacLaren

Significance The alternative to passporting after Brexit is ‘equivalence’, which would allow EU and UK firms access each other’s financial markets. However, such a regime does have the same sectoral coverage as passporting and is vulnerable to revocation. Impacts New free trade deals with non-EU countries will not substitute for the EU’s single market in terms of financial services coverage. While the strength of other EU financial centres will grow, London has an infrastructure that is difficult to replicate. Failure to reach an agreement on UK-EU financial services trade could see many firms unable to serve EU clients from London.


1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 11-22
Author(s):  
Vivek Moorthy

This paper by Vivek Moorthy evaluates the policy choices and factors that have contributed to the Asian crisis. It is argued that the interaction between rela - tively closed and weak banking systems and liberalized financial flows played a major role in the crisis. Data on capital flows to Taiwan suggest that the prospect of an IMF bailout is likely to have induced risky private capital flows to East Asia. The appropriate policy response is not to impose sweeping controls⁄ as is often being recommended, but to partially restrict capital inflows while simultaneously free up limited outflows, and also expose the banking and financial services sector to more external competition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document