scholarly journals P-B01 First Inventory of Access and Quality of Metabolic Surgery across Europe

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piriyah Sinclair ◽  
Guy Vijgen ◽  
Edo Aarts ◽  
Yves Van Nieuwenhove ◽  
Almantas Maleckas

Abstract Background Europe consists of 51 independent countries. Variation in healthcare regulations results in differing challenges faced by patients and professionals. The obesity pandemic has multiple health, economic and social implications. However, metabolic surgery is not universally accessible, with significant variations in its provision. This study aimed to gain insight into compliance with international guidelines; the accessibility and barriers to surgery; patient pathways and qualitor indicators of both metabolic and body contouring surgery after weight loss in different European countries. Methods This study was initiated during the European Obesity Academy (EOA). Expert representatives in the metabolic field from all 51 European countries were sent a novel, 37-item, electronic self-administered online questionnaire on their data and experiences from the previous year exploring accessibility to and quality indicators for metabolic surgery and body contouring surgery after weight loss. The survey tool was peer-reviewed by experienced researchers and piloted by fifteen experienced researchers with a spread of seniority and specialty. Content and face validity were ensured by peer-review and the piloting process. 45 completed responses were collected.  Results 68% of countries had eligibility criteria for metabolic surgery; 59% adhered to these. 46% had reimbursement criteria for metabolic surgery. 41% had eligibility criteria for plastic surgery and 31% reimbursement criteria. Average tariffs for a metabolic procedure varied (€800-€ 16000). MDTs were mandated in 78%, with team members varying significantly. Referral practises differed. In 45% metabolic surgery is performed by pure metabolic surgeons. 23% had a metabolic training program. Access to metabolic surgery was rated poor/ very poor in 33%. 35% had a bariatric registry. 24% required a minimum procedure number for metabolic centres; varying from 25 to 200 procedures. Conclusions This is the first study to describe accessibility and quality data on metabolic and body contouring surgery from most European countries. There are myriad differences between European countries in terms of accessibility to metabolic surgery. Lack of funding, education and structure fuels this disparity. We hope this study will impact standardisation of access and quality indicators for metabolic and body contouring surgery across European countries, as well as be a springboard for further evaluation of international metabolic surgery practices.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piriyah Sinclair ◽  
Guy H. E. J. Vijgen ◽  
Edo O. Aarts ◽  
Yves Van Nieuwenhove ◽  
Almantas Maleckas

Abstract Introduction Europe consists of 51 independent countries. Variation in healthcare regulations results in differing challenges faced by patients and professionals. This study aimed to gain more insight into the accessibility, patient pathway and quality indicators of metabolic and body contouring surgery. Methods and Materials Expert representatives in the metabolic field from all 51 countries were sent an electronic self-administered online questionnaire on their data and experiences from the previous year exploring accessibility to and quality indicators for metabolic surgery and plastic surgery after weight loss. Results Forty-five responses were collected. Sixty-eight percent of countries had eligibility criteria for metabolic surgery; 59% adhered to the guidelines. Forty-six percent had reimbursement criteria for metabolic surgery. Forty-one percent had eligibility criteria for plastic surgery and 31% reimbursement criteria. Average tariffs for a metabolic procedure varied € 800 to 16,000. MDTs were mandated in 78%, with team members varying significantly. Referral practices differed. In 45%, metabolic surgery is performed by pure metabolic surgeons, whilst re-operations were performed by a metabolic surgeon in 28%. A metabolic training programme was available in 23%. Access to metabolic surgery was rated poor to very poor in 33%. Thirty-five percent had a bariatric registry. Procedure numbers and numbers of hospitals performing metabolic surgery varied significantly. Twenty-four percent of countries required a minimum procedure number for metabolic centres, which varied from 25 to 200 procedures. Conclusion There are myriad differences between European countries in terms of accessibility to and quality indicators of metabolic surgery. Lack of funding, education and structure fuels this disparity. Criteria should be standardised across Europe with clear guidelines. Graphical abstract


2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (S 01) ◽  
pp. 114-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhat Shrivastava ◽  
Aggarwal Aditya ◽  
Khazanchi Rakesh Kumar

ABSTRACTThe number of patients with history of extreme overweight and massive weight loss (MWL) has risen significantly. Majority of patients are left with loose, ptotic skin envelopes, and oddly shaped protuberances, subsequent to weight loss. Redundant skin and fat can be seen anywhere on the body following MWL. This group of population presents many unique problems and challenges. Body contouring surgery after MWL is a new and exciting field in plastic surgery that is still evolving. Conventional approaches do not adequately cater to the needs of these patients. Complete history, detailed physical examination, clinical photographs and lab investigations help to plan the most appropriate procedure for the individual patient. Proper counseling and comprehensive informed consent for each procedure are mandatory. The meticulous and precise markings based on the procedure selected are the cornerstones to achieve the successful outcome. Lower body contouring should be performed first followed six months later by breast, lateral chest and arm procedures. Thighplasty is usually undertaken at the end. Body contouring operations are staged at few months′ intervals and often result in long scars. Staging is important as each procedure can have positive impact on adjacent areas of the body. Secondary procedures are often required. However, proper planning should lead to fewer complications and improved aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction.


Author(s):  
Rawan ElAbd ◽  
Osama A. Samargandi ◽  
Khalifa AlGhanim ◽  
Salma Alhamad ◽  
Sulaiman Almazeedi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aijia Cai ◽  
Linda Maringa ◽  
Theresa Hauck ◽  
Anja M. Boos ◽  
Marweh Schmitz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document