scholarly journals Emergency Department chest pain patient experience time (PET): the impact of ANP cardiology autonomy from triage to diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ingram

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Chest pain accounts for 8% of local Emergency Department (ED) presentations. Patient experience time (PET) is the entire time each patient spends in ED and the national ED PET goal is 6 - 9 hours. The Cardiology Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) consult service reduced PET for patients with chest pain from 17 hours, however the average PET for patients presenting with chest pain remains high at 10 hours in 2019. Aim To assess the impact on of ANP Cardiology autonomy on the PET of chest pain patients who present to a busy ED. Method Building on 6 years of ANP chest pain consultations in the ED, cardiology ANPs expanded their caseload to fully manage chest pain patients directly from the waiting room as named clinicians, instead of an ED doctor.  The ANP managed the patient completely from triage to diagnosis, resulting in discharge or admission. Enablers included ANP referral for ionising radiation and medicinal prescribing, with buy in from ED Consultants and Cardiology clinical lead. All patients managed directly by the ANP from 2017-2019 were included in the data analysis. The ED symphony system was used as a clinical and audit tool. ANP chest pain PET was compared to ED Doctor chest pain PET. This service evaluation was approved by the hospital audit committee.  Results 197 patients who presented with chest pain were autonomously managed by one ANP as a named clinician over 3 years. Sixty-four percent were managed completely autonomously.  Eighty per cent were discharged from ED. ANP decision time from initial assessment to admit or discharge was 2.6 hours. The ANP average chest pain PET time was 7.5 hours compared to average ED doctor chest pain PET of 9.5 hours. Conclusions As social distancing now impacts more than ever on usual ED pressures, caseload expansion by the Cardiology ANPs evidences further PET reductions for patients who present with chest pain in line with targets. As only one ANP is on the floor and not every shift, many hours of the PET occurred in the ED prior to the ANP ‘clicking’ on as a named clinician. Professional courage to completely manage this potentially high risk cohort autonomously has been welcomed patients and ED staff. PET of the chest pain patient has the potential to reduce further with more ANPs proficient in chest pain assessment within the emergency department setting.

1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 563-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis G Graff ◽  
John Dallara ◽  
Michael A Ross ◽  
Anthony J Joseph ◽  
James Itzcovitz ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 696-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Limkakeng ◽  
W. Brian Gibler ◽  
Charles Pollack ◽  
James W. Hoekstra ◽  
Frank Sites ◽  
...  

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S119-S119 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sonntag ◽  
E. Lang

Introduction: Reducing the number of patients requiring cardiac monitoring would increase system capacity and improve emergency department (ED) patient flow. The Ottawa Chest Pain Rule helps physicians identify chest pain patients who do not require cardiac monitoring and is based on a ‘normal or non-specific’ ECG and being pain-free on initial physician assessment. Our objective was to measure the impact that the implementation of this decision rule would have on cardiac monitoring bed utilization in adult EDs in Calgary. Methods: A convenience sample of patients was prospectively obtained at each of the four Calgary adult emergency sites. All patients presenting with the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale chief complaint of “cardiac pain”, or “chest pain with cardiac features” were captured for inclusion in the study. Real time interviews and survey assessments were conducted with the primary nurse and physician involved in each patient’s care. Results: A total of 61 patients were captured by the study. Physicians identified cardiac as the primary rule-out pathology in 51% of these patients. The average Heart Score of all study patients was 4.2, and 30% of patients were ultimately admitted. Physicians believed that 39% of the 61 patients needed cardiac monitoring, while primary nurses believed that 59% needed monitoring. Of the 61 patients, 59% were triaged to areas providing cardiac monitoring. The application of the Ottawa Rule would have allowed 47% of patients triaged to cardiac monitoring to be taken off cardiac monitoring. This would translate to a total of greater than 74 hours saved or a reduction of 30% of the total cardiac monitored patient time. Conclusion: The Ottawa rule appears to be a low-risk emergency department flow intervention that has the potential to help reduce resource utilization in emergency departments. This change may result in increased emergency department capacity and improved overall patient flow. This simple rule based only on ECG findings and absence of chest pain can easily be applied and implemented without increasing physician workload or increasing risk to patients.


1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela A.D. Lupfer ◽  
Michael Altieri ◽  
Michael J. Sheridan ◽  
Cathleen Cannon Lilly

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document