scholarly journals Colon surgery: does the “bundle” approach reduce the surgical site infection risk?

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A D'Ambrosio ◽  
IN Emelurumonye ◽  
F Quattrocolo ◽  
CM Zotti ◽  
MF Furmenti
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Colon Surgery ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Site Infection

scholarly journals Albumin and surgical site infection risk in orthopaedics: a meta-analysis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peizhi Yuwen ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Hongzhi Lv ◽  
Chen Feng ◽  
Yansen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Site Infection

scholarly journals Risk factors for surgical site infection in colon surgery in our population

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
Santiago Olguín Joseau ◽  
Natalia Paola Bollati ◽  
Santiago Reimondez ◽  
Franco Signorini ◽  
Alejandro Mario Rossini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Colon Surgery ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Quimioterapia Neoadyuvante ◽  
Factores De Riesgo

<p>Introducción: La infección de sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) es la infección intrahospitalaria más frecuente en los pacientes quirúrgicos con una incidencia entre 5-30%. Objetivos: Identificar los factores de riesgo para ISQ en cirugía colónica en nuestra población. Los objetivos secundarios son determinar la incidencia y tipo de ISQ, así como la incidencia de dehiscencia de anastomosis (DA). Materiales y métodos: Estudio de casos-controles de pacientes intervenidos de colectomía entre 2010-2014 en el Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba y Hospital Raúl Ferreyra. Se incluyeron las intervenciones convencionales y laparoscópicas, con seguimiento de 30 días, pacientes entre 20 y 85 años y con ASA I-III. Se excluyeron las cirugías de urgencia y las resecciones recto-anales. Se definió ISQ a aquella que ocurre dentro de 30 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron 238 pacientes. Se diagnosticó ISQ en 27,7% (n=66) de los pacientes de los cuales 12,2% fue superficial, 4,6% profunda y 10,9% de órgano/espacio. El análisis multivariado demostró que la ISQ se asocia con sexo masculino (odds ratio [OR] 3,15; IC95%:1,43-6,92; p=0,004), quimioterapia neoadyuvante (OR 6,72; IC95%:1,48-30,93; p=0,01), conversión (OR 3,32; IC95%:1,13-9,77; p=0,02), reintervención dentro de 30 días postquirúrgicos (OR 12,34; IC95%:2,65-57,37, p=0,001) y DA (OR 12,83; IC95%:2,97- 55,5; p=0,001). La DA presenta una incidencia del 9,6%, de los cuales el 91% presentó ISQ y todas fueron de órgano/espacio. Conclusión: Sexo masculino, quimioterapia neoadyuvante, conversión, reintervención dentro de 30 días postquirúrgicos y DA son factores de riesgo para ISQ en nuestra población. Estos resultados deben ser considerados para implementar medidas preventivas para ISQ.</p>

scholarly journals Should preoperative showering or cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) be part of the surgical care bundle to prevent surgical site infection?

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E Edmiston ◽  
David Leaper
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Methodological Issues

Showering preoperatively with chlorhexidine gluconate is an issue that continues to promote debate; however, many studies demonstrate evidence of surgical site infection risk reduction. Methodological issues have been present in many of the studies used to compile guidelines and there has been a lack of standardisation of processes for application of the active agents in papers pre-2009. This review and commentary paper highlights the potential for enhancing compliance with this low-risk and low-cost intervention and provides some guidance for enhancing implementation of preoperative showering with both chlorhexidine in solution and impregnated wipes.

Surgical Jacket and Bouffant Use and Surgical Site Infection Risk—Reply

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 155 (10) ◽  
pp. 997
Author(s):  
Bradley W. Wills ◽  
Gerald McGwin ◽  
Brent A. Ponce
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Site Infection

scholarly journals Cost–benefit analysis of surveillance for surgical site infection following caesarean section

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e036919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Wloch ◽  
Albert Jan Van Hoek ◽  
Nathan Green ◽  
Joanna Conneely ◽  
Pauline Harrington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Surveillance Strategy

ObjectiveTo estimate the economic burden to the health service of surgical site infection following caesarean section and to identify potential savings achievable through implementation of a surveillance programme.DesignEconomic model to evaluate the costs and benefits of surveillance from community and hospital healthcare providers’ perspective.SettingEngland.ParticipantsWomen undergoing caesarean section in National Health Service hospitals.Main outcome measureCosts attributable to treatment and management of surgical site infection following caesarean section.ResultsThe costs (2010) for a hospital carrying out 800 caesarean sections a year based on infection risk of 9.6% were estimated at £18 914 (95% CI 11 521 to 29 499) with 28% accounted for by community care (£5370). With inflation to 2019 prices, this equates to an estimated cost of £5.0 m for all caesarean sections performed annually in England 2018–2019, approximately £1866 and £93 per infection managed in hospital and community, respectively. The cost of surveillance for a hospital for one calendar quarter was estimated as £3747 (2010 costs). Modelling a decrease in risk of infection of 30%, 20% or 10% between successive surveillance periods indicated that a variable intermittent surveillance strategy achieved higher or similar net savings than continuous surveillance. Breakeven was reached sooner with the variable surveillance strategy than continuous surveillance when the baseline risk of infection was 10% or 15% and smaller loses with a baseline risk of 5%.ConclusionSurveillance of surgical site infections after caesarean section with feedback of data to surgical teams offers a potentially effective means to reduce infection risk, improve patient experience and save money for the health service.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document