scholarly journals Conceptual and Perceptual Similarity Between Encoding and Retrieval Contexts and Recognition Memory Context Effects in Older and Younger Adults

2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. P171-P175 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Vakil ◽  
C. Hornik ◽  
D. A. Levy
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocco Palumbo ◽  
Alberto Di Domenico ◽  
Beth Fairfield ◽  
Nicola Mammarella

Abstract Background Numerous studies have reported that the repeated presentation of a stimulus leads to an increase in positive affect towards the stimulus itself (the so-called mere exposure effect). Here, we evaluate whether changes in liking due to repetition may have a differential impact on subsequent memories in younger and older adults. Method In two experiments, younger and older adults were asked to rate a series of nonwords (Experiment 1) or unfamiliar neutral faces (Experiment 2) in terms of how much they like them and then presented with a surprise yes–no recognition memory task. At study, items were repeated either consecutively (massed presentation) or with a lag of 6 intervening items (spaced presentation). Results In both experiments, participants rated spaced repeated items more positively than massed items, i.e. they liked them most. Moreover, older adults remembered spaced stimuli that they liked most better than younger adults. Conclusions The findings are discussed in accordance with the mechanisms underlying positivity effects in memory and the effect of repetition on memory encoding.


1972 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Davis ◽  
Robert S. Lockhart ◽  
Donald M. Thomson

1982 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherri MacKay-Soroka ◽  
Sandra E. Trehub ◽  
Dale H. Bull ◽  
Carl M. Corter

2013 ◽  
Vol 227 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Weigand ◽  
Melanie Feeser ◽  
Matti Gärtner ◽  
Emily Brandt ◽  
Yan Fan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-171
Author(s):  
Abhilasha Vishwanath ◽  
Joshua Shive

1976 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Watkins ◽  
Elaine Ho ◽  
Endel Tulving

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2541-2554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Hayes ◽  
Elsa Baena ◽  
Trong-Kha Truong ◽  
Roberto Cabeza

Although people do not normally try to remember associations between faces and physical contexts, these associations are established automatically, as indicated by the difficulty of recognizing familiar faces in different contexts (“butcher-on-the-bus” phenomenon). The present fMRI study investigated the automatic binding of faces and scenes. In the face–face (F–F) condition, faces were presented alone during both encoding and retrieval, whereas in the face/scene–face (FS–F) condition, they were presented overlaid on scenes during encoding but alone during retrieval (context change). Although participants were instructed to focus only on the faces during both encoding and retrieval, recognition performance was worse in the FS–F than in the F–F condition (“context shift decrement” [CSD]), confirming automatic face–scene binding during encoding. This binding was mediated by the hippocampus as indicated by greater subsequent memory effects (remembered > forgotten) in this region for the FS–F than the F–F condition. Scene memory was mediated by right parahippocampal cortex, which was reactivated during successful retrieval when the faces were associated with a scene during encoding (FS–F condition). Analyses using the CSD as a regressor yielded a clear hemispheric asymmetry in medial temporal lobe activity during encoding: Left hippocampal and parahippocampal activity was associated with a smaller CSD, indicating more flexible memory representations immune to context changes, whereas right hippocampal/rhinal activity was associated with a larger CSD, indicating less flexible representations sensitive to context change. Taken together, the results clarify the neural mechanisms of context effects on face recognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document