Polarimetric Radar Calibration Method Using Polarization-Preserving and Polarization-Selective Reflectors

2005 ◽  
Vol E88-B (8) ◽  
pp. 3428-3435 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. FUJITA
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amvrossios C. Bagtzoglou ◽  
Justin M. Niedzialek ◽  
Sandrine A. Baun ◽  
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou ◽  
Fred L. Ogden

Author(s):  
E.G. Pusone ◽  
P. van Genderen ◽  
L.P. Ligthart ◽  
J.S van Sinttruijen

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Borowska ◽  
D. Zrnic

Abstract It is suggested that urban ground clutter can have a role in monitoring calibration of reflectivity factor ZH and differential reflectivity ZDR on polarimetric radars. The median and average values of these variables are considered. Analysis of data from 1 month of cold season in Germany (X-band radar) and 3.5 hot days in Oklahoma (S-band radar) is presented. In the presence of up to moderate rain or snow a reflectivity threshold suffices for separating significant clutter from precipitation observed with an X-band radar. The same threshold was suitable on observations with an S-band radar in Oklahoma because heavy precipitation was not present. The tests suggest the scheme is worthy considering for operational monitoring of ZH as its median values at both locations were within the quantization interval of 0.5 dB. Environmental factors that can influence reflectivities from clutter are examined. The effects on ZDR can be significant. These are quantified in the data and possible uses for calibration and monitoring radar status are indicated.


1991 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.W. Whitt ◽  
F.T. Ulaby ◽  
P. Polatin ◽  
V.V. Liepa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Toledo ◽  
Julien Delanoë ◽  
Martial Haeffelin ◽  
Jean-Charles Dupont

Abstract. This article presents a new Cloud Radar calibration methodology using solid reference reflectors mounted on masts, developed during two field experiments held in 2018 and 2019 at the SIRTA atmospheric observatory, located in Palaiseau, France, in the framework of the ACTRIS-2 research and innovation program. The experimental setup includes 10 cm and 20 cm triangular trihedral targets installed at the top of 10 m and 20 m masts, respectively. The 10 cm target is mounted on a pan-tilt motor at the top of the 10 m mast to precisely align its boresight with the radar beam. Sources of calibration bias and uncertainty are identified and quantified. Specifically, this work assesses the impact of receiver compression, incomplete antenna overlap, temperature variations inside the radar, clutter and experimental setup misalignment. Setup misalignment is a source of bias previously undocumented in the literature, that can have an impact on the order of tenths of dB in calibration retrievals of W band Radars. A detailed analysis enabled the design of a calibration methodology which can reach a cloud radar calibration uncertainty of 0.3 dB based on the equipment used in the experiment. Among different sources of uncertainty, the two largest terms are due to signal-to-clutter ratio and radar-to-target alignment. The analysis revealed that our 20 m mast setup with an approximate alignment approach is preferred to the 10 m mast setup with the motor-driven alignment system. The calibration uncertainty associated with signal-to-clutter ratio of the former is ten times smaller than for the latter. Cloud radar calibration results are found to be repeatable when comparing results from a total of 18 independent tests. Once calibrated the cloud radar provides valid reflectivity values when sampling mid-tropospheric clouds. Thus we conclude that the method is repeatable and robust, and that the uncertainties are precisely characterized. The method can be implemented under different configurations as long as the proposed principles are respected. It could be extended to reference reflectors held by other lifting devices such as tethered balloons or unmanned aerial vehicles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document