scholarly journals PM2.5 air pollution and cause-specific cardiovascular disease mortality

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B Hayes ◽  
Chris Lim ◽  
Yilong Zhang ◽  
Kevin Cromar ◽  
Yongzhao Shao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ambient air pollution is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet uncertainty remains about the size of risks at lower levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure which now occur in the USA and elsewhere. Methods We investigated the relationship of ambient PM2.5 exposure with cause-specific cardiovascular disease mortality in 565 477 men and women, aged 50 to 71 years, from the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. During 7.5 x 106 person-years of follow up, 41 286 cardiovascular disease deaths, including 23 328 ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and 5894 stroke deaths, were ascertained using the National Death Index. PM2.5 was estimated using a hybrid land use regression (LUR) geostatistical model. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Each increase of 10  μg/m3 PM2.5 (overall range, 2.9–28.0  μg/m3) was associated, in fully adjusted models, with a 16% increase in mortality from ischaemic heart disease [hazard ratio (HR) 1.16; 95% CI 1.09-1.22] and a 14% increase in mortality from stroke (HR 1.14; CI 1.02-1.27). Compared with PM2.5 exposure <8  μg/m3 (referent), risks for CVD were increased in relation to PM2.5 exposures in the range of 8–12  μg/m3 (CVD: HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08), in the range 12–20  μg/m3 (CVD: HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) and in the range 20+ μg/m3 (CVD: HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.10-1.28). Results were robust to alternative approaches to PM2.5 exposure assessment and statistical analysis. Conclusions Long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution is associated with ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality, with excess risks occurring in the range of and below the present US long-term standard for ambient exposure to PM2.5 (12  µg/m3), indicating the need for continued improvements in air pollution abatement for CVD prevention.

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (48) ◽  
pp. 3889-3897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M Sturgeon ◽  
Lei Deng ◽  
Shirley M Bluethmann ◽  
Shouhao Zhou ◽  
Daniel M Trifiletti ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims This observational study characterized cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk for multiple cancer sites, with respect to the following: (i) continuous calendar year, (ii) age at diagnosis, and (iii) follow-up time after diagnosis. Methods and results The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to compare the US general population to 3 234 256 US cancer survivors (1973–2012). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated using coded cause of death from CVDs (heart disease, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, atherosclerosis, and aortic aneurysm/dissection). Analyses were adjusted by age, race, and sex. Among 28 cancer types, 1 228 328 patients (38.0%) died from cancer and 365 689 patients (11.3%) died from CVDs. Among CVDs, 76.3% of deaths were due to heart disease. In eight cancer sites, CVD mortality risk surpassed index-cancer mortality risk in at least one calendar year. Cardiovascular disease mortality risk was highest in survivors diagnosed at <35 years of age. Further, CVD mortality risk is highest (SMR 3.93, 95% confidence interval 3.89–3.97) within the first year after cancer diagnosis, and CVD mortality risk remains elevated throughout follow-up compared to the general population. Conclusion The majority of deaths from CVD occur in patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, or bladder cancer. We observed that from the point of cancer diagnosis forward into survivorship cancer patients (all sites) are at elevated risk of dying from CVDs compared to the general US population. In endometrial cancer, the first year after diagnosis poses a very high risk of dying from CVDs, supporting early involvement of cardiologists in such patients.


Heart ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wuxiang Xie ◽  
Gang Li ◽  
Dong Zhao ◽  
Xueqin Xie ◽  
Zaihua Wei ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (23) ◽  
pp. 23603-23614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangcong Liu ◽  
Baijun Sun ◽  
Lianzheng Yu ◽  
Jianping Chen ◽  
Bing Han ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document