scholarly journals Determination of Neutral Lactase Activity in Industrial Enzyme Preparations by a Colorimetric Enzymatic Method: Collaborative Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrianus J Engelen ◽  
Peter H G Randsdorp ◽  
R Cassaigne ◽  
S M Dutta ◽  
M Harboe ◽  
...  

Abstract Thirteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study to validate a colorimetric assay for determining neutral lactase activity in industrial enzyme preparations. Each laboratory received 5 duplicate samples with activity levels of 2000 and 5000 neutral lactase units provided by 4 commercial suppliers. Two laboratories did not return results. Method performance was calculated according to AOAC guidelines. From the 11 remaining laboratories, 3 were excluded from statistical analysis because of invalid data determined during initial review by Youden pair, value versus laboratory. Repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) values ranged from 3.20 to 8.62%, and reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values ranged from 8.77 to 16.35%. With outliers excluded, RSDr values ranged from 2.94 to 5.01%, and RSDRvalues ranged from 7.50 to 13.84%. The colorimetric enzymatic method for determining neutral lactase activity in industrial enzyme preparations has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.

1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T Elder ◽  
Rachel S Montgomery

Abstract Fifteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study to validate a colorimetric assay for the determination of glucoamylase in industrial enzyme preparations. All laboratories received 12 samples as blind duplicates provided by 3 industrial producers. Each sample was analyzed once a day for 3 days. Results from one laboratory were excluded from the statistical analysis. Performance of the method was calculated according to the AOAC guidelines. For all 15 laboratories the repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) values ranged from 0.89 to 2.37%, and the reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values ranged from 7.92 to 9.86. After excluding outliers the RSDr values ranged from 0.74 to 2.24%, and RSDR values ranged from 3.46 to 8.92. The colorimetric enzymatic method for determination of glucoamylase activity in industrial enzyme preparations has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.


2001 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrianus J Engelen ◽  
Fred C van der Heeft ◽  
Peter H G Randsdorp ◽  
Wim A C Somers ◽  
Jan Schaefer ◽  
...  

Abstract Fourteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study (coded fyt9404) and 13 laboratories participated in a study (coded fyt9410) to validate a colorimetric assay for determination of microbial phytase activity in feed. For each study, all laboratories received 6 laboratory samples provided by one commercial supplier (phytase activity levels within the range of 200–400 per kg) to be analyzed in duplicate. Method performance was calculated and statistical calculations were executed according to AOAC guidelines. Results from 3 laboratories for study fyt9404 and from one laboratory for study fyt9410 were excluded from statistical analysis because of invalid data determined during initial review by Youden pair, value versus laboratory. For study fyt9404, repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) values ranged from 6.2 to 8.6%, and reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values ranged from 14.1 to 27.6%. No outliers were identified. For study fyt9410, RSDr values ranged from 3.9 to 7.9%, and RSDR values ranged from 14.0 to 20.5%. With outliers excluded, RSDr values ranged from 2.5 to 7.9%, and RSDR values ranged from 14.0 to 20.5%.


1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna M Lynch ◽  
David M Barbano ◽  
J Richard Fleming

Abstract The classic method for determination of milk casein is based on precipitation of casein at pH 4.6. Precipitated milk casein is removed by filtration and the nitrogen content of either the precipitate (direct casein method) or filtrate (noncasein nitrogen; NCN) is determined by Kjeldahl analysis. For the indirect casein method, milk total nitrogen (TN; Method 991.20) is also determined and casein is calculated as TN minus NCN. Ten laboratories tested 9 pairs of blind duplicate raw milk materials with a casein range of 2.42- 3.05℅ by both the direct and indirect casein methods. Statistical performance expressed in protein equivalents (nitrogen ⨯ 6.38) with invalid and outlier data removed was as follows: NCN method (wt%), mean = 0.762, sr = 0.010, SR = 0.016, repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) = 1.287℅, reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) = 2.146%; indirect casein method (wt℅), mean = 2.585, repeatability = 0.015, reproducibility = 0.022, RSDr = 0.560℅, RSDR = 0.841; direct casein method (wt℅), mean = 2.575, sr = 0.015, sR = 0.025, RSDr = 0.597℅, RSDR = 0.988℅. Method performance was acceptable and comparable to similar Kjeldahl methods for determining nitrogen content of milk (Methods 991.20, 991.21,991.22, 991.23). The direct casein, indirect casein, and noncasein nitrogen methods have been adopted by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.


2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-Fang Pang ◽  
Yan-Zhong Cao ◽  
Chun-Lin Fan ◽  
Jin-Jie Zhang ◽  
Xue-Min Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Eighteen laboratories participated in a collaborative study on the determination of clopidol residues in chicken muscle tissues by liquid chromatography. Of these, results from 16 laboratories which rigorously followed the method were subjected to statistical analysis. The method performance was assessed by all participants using 14 samples of chicken muscle fortified at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 mg/kg. In addition, 9 participants each reported results for 6 clopidol-incurred samples in chicken muscle. Test portions were extracted with acetonitrile, and the extracts were purified with alumina and anion exchange resin solid-phase extraction cartridges in sequence. Clopidol was separated by reversed-phase liquid chromatography and quantified at 270 nm. Average recoveries ranged from 81.8 to 85.4%, reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 11.9 to 22.6%, and repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) ranged from 9.9 to 15.1%. For clopidol-incurred samples at concentrations of 0.100–0.687 mg/kg, the mean determination value range was 0.099–0.659 mg/kg; RSDR was 12.6–19.8%, RSDr was 3.1–8.5%; and HORRAT values were 0.7–1.1. The accuracy and precision of the method are in conformity with the requirements specified by AOAC INTERNATIONAL. The method was adopted Official First Action in April 2003.


1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 580-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry V Mccleary ◽  
David C Mugford ◽  
M C Camire ◽  
T S Gibson ◽  
K Harrigan ◽  
...  

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted involving 8 laboratories (including the authors’ laboratories) to validate the streamlined enzymatic method for determination of ß-D-glucan in barley and oats. In the method, the flour sample is cooked to hydrate and gelatinize ß-glucan, which is subsequently hydrolyzed to soluble fragments with the lichenase enzyme. After volume and pH adjustments and filtration, the solution is treated with ß-glucosidase, which hydrolyzes ß-gluco-oligosaccharides to D-glucose. D-Glucose is measured with glucose oxidase-peroxidase reagent. Other portions of lichenase hydrolysate are treated directly with glucose oxidase-peroxidase reagent to measure free glucose in test sample. If levels of free glucose are high, the sample is extracted first with 80% ethanol. For all samples analyzed, the repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) values ranged from 3.1 to 12.3% and the reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values ranged from 6.6 to 12.3%. The streamlined enzymatic method for determination of ß-D-glucan in barley and oats has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.


2002 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 889-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Verdon ◽  
Pierric Couëdor ◽  
Pierre Maris ◽  
Michel Laurentie ◽  
P Batjoens ◽  
...  

Abstract A collaborative study involving 14 laboratories was conducted to determine residues of ampicillin in porcine muscle tissue by using a liquid chromatographic method developed for multipenicillin analysis that can quantitate 8 penicillin compounds (benzylpenicillin, phenoxymethylpenicillin, ampicillin, amoxicillin, nafcillin, oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin) at trace levels in muscle tissue. This method involves extraction of the penicillins with phosphate buffer, pH 9, followed cleanup and concentration on a C18 solid-phase extraction column and reaction with benzoic anhydride at 50°C and with 1,2,4-triazole and mercury(II) chloride solution, pH 9.0, at 65°C. The derivatized compounds are eluted isocratically on a C8 column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (pH 6; 0.1M) containing sodium thiosulfate and the ion-pair reagent tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate. The penicillins are detected by UV absorption at 325 nm. The limit of detection and the limit of determination (quantitation) of the method were calculated to be approximately 3–5 and 25 μg/kg, respectively, in accordance with the criteria of European Union (EU) Decision No. 93/256/EEC. In this first interlaboratory study, collaborators were instructed to monitor 4 different penicillin compounds (benzylpenicillin, phenoxymethylpenicillin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin) by analyzing 8 blind samples of muscle tissue in triplicate. These samples were prepared from 2 materials containing different concentrations of incurred ampicillin (63.5 μg/kg for material No. 1 and 358.1 μg/kg for material No. 2) and 1 blank material. The repeatability relative standard deviation and the reproducibility relative standard deviation were 10.2 and 17.4%, respectively, for material No. 1 and 7.0 and 16.0%, respectively, for material No. 2. These results demonstrate that the method is suitable for the determination of ampicillin residues in muscle tissue at the EU maximum residue limit (50 μg/kg) and above. However, the identification of positives by this procedure may need additional confirmation by techniques with greater specificity, such as liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, or tandem mass spectrometry. Investigations regarding the basis of interlaboratory testing studies will further demonstrate the suitability of multiresidue methodology for detecting and quantitating other compounds in the family of penicillin antibiotics.


2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 899-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J Thiex ◽  
Shirley Anderson ◽  
Bryan Gildemeister ◽  
W Adcock ◽  
J Boedigheimer ◽  
...  

Abstract A method for determining crude fat in animal feed, cereal grain, and forage (plant tissue) was collaboratively studied. Crude fat was extracted from the animal feed, cereal grain, or forage material with hexanes by the Randall method, also called the Soxtec method or the submersion method. The use of hexanes provides for an alternative to diethyl ether for fat extractions. The proposed submersion method considerably decreases the extraction time required to complete a batch of samples compared to Soxhlet. The increase in throughput is very desirable in the quest for faster turnaround times and the greater efficiency in the use of labor. In addition, this method provides for reclamation of the solvent as a step of the method. The submersion method for fat extraction was previously studied for meat and meat products and was accepted as AOAC Official Method 991.36. Fourteen blind samples were sent to 14 collaborators in the United States, Sweden, Canada, and Germany. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation (repeatability) ranged from 1.23 to 5.80% for crude fat. Among-laboratory (including within) relative standard deviation (reproducibility) ranged from 1.88 to 14.1%. The method is recommended for Official First Action.


2003 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 888-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J Thiex ◽  
Shirley Anderson ◽  
Bryan Gildemeister ◽  
W Adcock ◽  
J Boedigheimer ◽  
...  

Abstract A method for determining crude fat in animal feed, cereal grain, and forage (plant tissue) was collaboratively studied. Crude fat was extracted from the animal feed, cereal grain, or forage material with diethyl ether by the Randall method, also called the Soxtec method or the submersion method. The proposed submersion method considerably decreases the extraction time required to complete a batch of samples. The increase in throughput is very desirable in the quest for faster turnaround times and the greater efficiency in the use of labor. In addition, this method provides for reclamation of the solvent as a step of the method. The submersion method for fat extraction was previously studied for meat and meat products and was accepted as AOAC Official Method 991.36. Fourteen blind samples were sent to 12 collaborators in the United States, Sweden, Canada, and Germany. The within-laboratory relative standard deviation (repeatability) ranged from 1.09 to 9.26% for crude fat. Among-laboratory (including within) relative standard deviation (reproducibility) ranged from 1.0 to 21.0%. The method is recommended for Official First Action.


1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 672-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R Beuaars ◽  
Remmelt Van Dijk ◽  
Arie Brands

Abstract A collaborative study of the determination of p-tolu-enesulfonamide (p-TSA) in ice cream by a combination of continuous flow and on-line liquid chromatography was conducted. Seven ice cream samples containing 0-6.35 mg p-TSA/kg at 4 levels (1 blank and 3 pairs of split level samples) were analyzed by 11 laboratories. For all samples analyzed, the repeatability relative standard deviation varied from 2.08 to 3.67%, whereas the reproducibility relative standard deviation ranged from 7.79 to 11.68%. The average p-TSA values for the split levels 1,2, and 3 were 0.55,1.02, and 4.44 mg p-TSA/kg, respectively, with mean recoveries ranging from 76 to 79% (overall recovery range for all levels, 63-101 %). No false positive results were reported for the blank sample, and no interference was encountered by the presence of vanillin in samples. The method has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.


2011 ◽  
Vol 94 (5) ◽  
pp. 1555-1561
Author(s):  
Cindy Moser ◽  
Kathy Herman ◽  
K Barnhardt ◽  
M Ceizyk ◽  
T Chriscoe ◽  
...  

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted to determine the protein content of raw and processed meat products by a protein-tagging and colorimetric technique. Meat products were prepared following AOAC Official MethodSM 983.18 and analyzed using CEM Corporation's Sprint Rapid Protein Analyzer. Sprint provides protein results by combining an accurately weighed test portion with a known amount of dye-binding agent. The dye-binding agent binds with the lysine, histidine, and arginine, as well as the n-terminus of the proteins commonly found in raw meat and processed meat products. Results are displayed and reported by the Sprint as a percentage (g/100 g) of protein. Ten blind duplicate study samples were sent to 10 collaborating laboratories in the United States. The within-laboratory (repeatability) relative standard deviation (RSDr) ranged from 0.91 to 3.04%, and between-laboratories (reproducibility) relative standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 1.50 to 3.41% for protein. The method is recommended for Official First Action.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document