15 Use of Bioelectric Impedance Analysis in Burn Patients: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S16-S16
Author(s):  
Ian F Hulsebos ◽  
Maxwell B Johnson ◽  
Leigh J Spera ◽  
Megan C Fobar ◽  
Zachary J Collier ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA) is a rapid, non-invasive, and inexpensive technology based on electrical conductivity. BIA assesses body composition, fluid shifts, and phase angle, an electrical force vector where smaller values suggest cellular injury. Our objective was to use BIA to longitudinally track the clinical status of burn patients. We hypothesized that BIA would detect progressive decreases in muscle mass throughout the patient’s hospital course and that low phase angle values would correlate with severity of injury. Methods A cohort study of 10 patients from January 1, 2020 to March 13, 2020 was performed at an ABA-verified burn center. Patient and burn characteristics and laboratory data were collected. BIA measurements were performed daily for the first 10 days of admission and then twice weekly until discharge. The primary outcome was to detect changes in body composition. The secondary objectives were to detect differences between low and high-risk patients in terms of water composition and phase angle. Patients with APACHE II > 15, measured at burn unit admission, were considered high risk for burn injury related morbidity and mortality. Results BIA detected a statistically significant negative correlation between time spent hospitalized and leg lean mass (LM) (r2=0.56, P< 0.0001), right arm LM (r2=0.52, P< 0.0001) and left leg LM (r2=0.57, P< 0.0001), and positive correlation between body fat mass (BFM) and time spent hospitalized (r2=0.50, P=0.0004). Water composition (volume of extracellular water (ECW) per total body water (TBW)) negatively correlated with low-risk patients: right arm (r2=0.51, P< 0.0001), left arm (0.71, P< 0.001), thorax (0.66, P< 0.0001), right leg (0.74, P< 0.0001), left leg (0.35, P=0.002). Full body phase angle increased with low-risk patients over their hospital course (r2=0.62, P< 0.0001), while phase angle decreased with high-risk patients (r2=0.71, P=0.0006). Full body phase angle differentiated high risk patients (P< 0.0001), and phase angle of thorax differentiated between patients with and without inhalation injury (P=0.002). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that BIA measures changes in body composition and fluid shifts, identifies inhalation injury, and correlates with severity of injury in hospitalized burn patients. This pilot study included a limited number of participants with varying anatomic injuries presenting unique measurement challenges. Regardless, our preliminary data justifies a larger prospective study to confirm these results and correlate them with clinical outcomes.

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A376-A376
Author(s):  
B JEETSANDHU ◽  
R JAIN ◽  
J SINGH ◽  
M JAIN ◽  
J SHARMA ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 263-263
Author(s):  
Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq ◽  
Florence Jouan ◽  
Pascale Bellaud ◽  
Jacques-Philippe Moulinoux ◽  
Karim Bensalah ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksic ◽  
Luebke ◽  
Brunkwall

Background: In the present study the perioperative complication rate is compared between high- and low-risk patients when carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is routinely performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Patients and methods: From January 2000 through June 2008 1220 consecutive patients underwent CEA under LA. High-risk patients fulfilled at least one of the following characteristics: ASA 4 classification, “hostile neck”, recurrent ICA stenosis, contralateral ICA occlusion, age ≥ 80 years. The combined complication rate comprised any new neurological deficit (TIA or stroke), myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after CEA, which was compared between patient groups. Results: Overall 309 patients (25%) were attributed to the high-risk group, which differed significantly regarding sex distribution (more males: 70% vs. 63%, p = 0,011), neurological presentation (more asymptomatic: 72% vs. 62%, p = 0,001) and shunt necessity (33% vs. 14%, p < 0,001). In 32 patients 17 TIAs and 15 strokes were observed. In 3 patients a myocardial infarction occurred. Death occurred in one patient following a stroke and in another patient following myocardial infarction, leading to a combined complication rate of 2,9% (35/1220). In the multivariate analysis only previous neurological symptomatology (OR 2,85, 95% CI 1,38-5,91) and intraoperative shunting (OR 5,57, 95% CI 2,69-11,55) were identified as independent risk factors for an increased combined complication rate. Conclusions: With the routine use of LA, CEA was not associated with worse outcome in high-risk patients. Considering the data reported in the literature, it does not appear justified to refer high-risk patients principally to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) when LA can be chosen to perform CEA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document