The applicability of motor learning to neurorehabilitation

Author(s):  
John W. Krakauer

Rehabilitation is a form of directed training and is therefore predicated on the idea that patients respond to such training by learning. Current concepts in motor learning are reviewed. Recovery is not synonymous with re-learning and that it is important to be specific about what learning mechanism is being targeted by any given therapy. There is a unique milieu of heightened plasticity post-stroke that is responsible for reduction in impairment both through spontaneous biological recovery and increased responsiveness to training. In the chronic phase of stroke, plasticity returns to normal levels and learning for the most part only leads to task-specific compensation. Thus, new forms of intervention may have quite distinct effects depending on whether they are initiated in the sensitive period after stroke or in the chronic phase. It is to be hoped that new pharmacological and non-invasive brain stimulation approaches will allow the post-stroke sensitive period to be augmented, extended, and re-opened.

Author(s):  
John W. Krakauer

Rehabilitation is a form of directed training and is therefore predicated on the idea that patients respond to such training by learning. However, true recovery (restitution) with behavioural training is not synonymous with learning. Animal models suggest that there is a unique milieu of heightened plasticity post-stroke that is responsible for reduction in impairment both through spontaneous biological recovery and increased responsiveness to training. In the chronic phase of stroke, plasticity returns to normal levels with the goal mainly being task-specific compensation via normal motor learning mechanisms. In humans, there is a time-limited period of spontaneous recovery but it has yet to be shown whether patients after stroke have increased responsiveness to training over this same interval. Thus, new forms of behavioural intervention for patients may have distinct effects depending on whether they are initiated in the sensitive period after stroke (training interacting with repair) or in the chronic phase (compensation via motor learning). It is to be hoped that new pharmacological and non-invasive brain stimulation approaches will allow the post-stroke sensitive period to be augmented, extended, and re-opened. There may also be a subset of patients with chronic stroke that respond to much higher doses and intensities of motor training.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 821-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Israely ◽  
Gerry Leisman

Abstract Individuals post-stroke sustain motor deficits years after the stroke. Despite recent advancements in the applications of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and Deep Brain Stimulation in humans, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use for rehabilitation after brain lesions. Non-invasive brain stimulation is already in use for treating motor deficits in individuals with Parkinson’s disease and post-stroke. Deep Brain Stimulation has become an established treatment for individuals with movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, epilepsy, cerebral palsy and dystonia. It has also been utilized for the treatment of Tourette’s syndrome, Alzheimer’s disease and neuropsychiatric conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depression and anorexia nervosa. There exists growing scientific knowledge from animal studies supporting the use of Deep Brain Stimulation to enhance motor recovery after brain damage. Nevertheless, these results are currently not applicable to humans. This review details the current literature supporting the use of these techniques to enhance motor recovery, both from human and animal studies, aiming to encourage development in this domain.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gottfried Schlaug ◽  
Sarah Marchina ◽  
Catherine Y. Wan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document