scholarly journals Dynamic changes in cis-regulatory occupancy by Six1 and its cooperative interactions with distinct cofactors drive lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 2880-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Aarthi Ramakrishnan ◽  
Bernd Fritzsch ◽  
Jinshu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Sensory Epithelium ◽  
Hair Bundle ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene

Abstract The transcription factor Six1 is essential for induction of sensory cell fate and formation of auditory sensory epithelium, but how it activates gene expression programs to generate distinct cell-types remains unknown. Here, we perform genome-wide characterization of Six1 binding at different stages of auditory sensory epithelium development and find that Six1-binding to cis-regulatory elements changes dramatically at cell-state transitions. Intriguingly, Six1 pre-occupies enhancers of cell-type-specific regulators and effectors before their expression. We demonstrate in-vivo cell-type-specific activity of Six1-bound novel enhancers of Pbx1, Fgf8, Dusp6, Vangl2, the hair-cell master regulator Atoh1 and a cascade of Atoh1’s downstream factors, including Pou4f3 and Gfi1. A subset of Six1-bound sites carry consensus-sequences for its downstream factors, including Atoh1, Gfi1, Pou4f3, Gata3 and Pbx1, all of which physically interact with Six1. Motif analysis identifies RFX/X-box as one of the most significantly enriched motifs in Six1-bound sites, and we demonstrate that Six1-RFX proteins cooperatively regulate gene expression through binding to SIX:RFX-motifs. Six1 targets a wide range of hair-bundle regulators and late Six1 deletion disrupts hair-bundle polarity. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how Six1 cooperates with distinct cofactors in feedforward loops to control lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium.

scholarly journals Deep autoencoder enables interpretable tissue-adaptive deconvolution and cell-type-specific gene analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Chen ◽  
Yixuan Wang ◽  
Yuelong Chen ◽  
Yumeng Wei ◽  
Yunxiang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractSingle-cell RNA-seq has become a powerful tool for researchers to study biologically significant characteristics at explicitly high resolution, but its application on emerging data is currently limited by its intrinsic techniques. Here, we introduce TAPE, a deep learning method that connects bulk RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq to balance the demands of big data and precision. By taking advantage of constructing an interpretable decoder and training under a unique scheme, TAPE can predict cell-type fractions and cell-type-specific gene expression tissue-adaptively. Compared with existing methods on several benchmarking datasets, TAPE is more accurate (up to 40% performnace improvement on the real bulk data) and faster than the previous methods. It is sensitive enough to provide biologically meaningful predictions. For example, only TAPE can predict the tendency of increasing monocytes-to-lymphocytes (MLR) ratio in COVID-19 patients from mild to serious symptoms, whose estimated indices are consistent with laboratory data. More importantly, through the analysis of clinical data, TAPE shows its ability to predict cell-type-specific gene expression profiles with biological significance. Combining with single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), TAPE also provides valuable clues for people to investigate the immune response in different virus-infected patients. We believe that TAPE will enable and accelerate the precise analysis of high-throughput clinical data in a wide range.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on cell type specific gene expression and splicing during neurogenesis elucidate regulatory mechanisms of brain traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nil Aygün ◽  
Angela L. Elwell ◽  
Dan Liang ◽  
Michael J. Lafferty ◽  
Kerry E. Cheek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Regulatory Effects

SummaryInterpretation of the function of non-coding risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders and brain-relevant traits via gene expression and alternative splicing is mainly performed in bulk post-mortem adult tissue. However, genetic risk loci are enriched in regulatory elements of cells present during neocortical differentiation, and regulatory effects of risk variants may be masked by heterogeneity in bulk tissue. Here, we map e/sQTLs and allele specific expression in primary human neural progenitors (n=85) and their sorted neuronal progeny (n=74). Using colocalization and TWAS, we uncover cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms underlying risk for these traits.

scholarly journals Srf destabilizes cellular identity by suppressing cell-type-specific gene expression programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Ikeda ◽  
Takafusa Hikichi ◽  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Hirofumi Shibata ◽  
Kanae Mitsunaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Cellular Identity

New insights into promoter–enhancer communication mechanisms revealed by dynamic single-molecule imaging

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieru Li ◽  
Alexandros Pertsinidis
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Single Molecule Imaging ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Regulatory Information ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Target Promoters

Establishing cell-type-specific gene expression programs relies on the action of distal enhancers, cis-regulatory elements that can activate target genes over large genomic distances — up to Mega-bases away. How distal enhancers physically relay regulatory information to target promoters has remained a mystery. Here, we review the latest developments and insights into promoter–enhancer communication mechanisms revealed by live-cell, real-time single-molecule imaging approaches.

scholarly journals Distinct CoREST complexes act in a cell-type-specific manner

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Mačinković ◽  
Ina Theofel ◽  
Tim Hundertmark ◽  
Kristina Kovač ◽  
Stephan Awe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
S2 Cells ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Cell Type Specific

Abstract CoREST has been identified as a subunit of several protein complexes that generate transcriptionally repressive chromatin structures during development. However, a comprehensive analysis of the CoREST interactome has not been carried out. We use proteomic approaches to define the interactomes of two dCoREST isoforms, dCoREST-L and dCoREST-M, in Drosophila. We identify three distinct histone deacetylase complexes built around a common dCoREST/dRPD3 core: A dLSD1/dCoREST complex, the LINT complex and a dG9a/dCoREST complex. The latter two complexes can incorporate both dCoREST isoforms. By contrast, the dLSD1/dCoREST complex exclusively assembles with the dCoREST-L isoform. Genome-wide studies show that the three dCoREST complexes associate with chromatin predominantly at promoters. Transcriptome analyses in S2 cells and testes reveal that different cell lineages utilize distinct dCoREST complexes to maintain cell-type-specific gene expression programmes: In macrophage-like S2 cells, LINT represses germ line-related genes whereas other dCoREST complexes are largely dispensable. By contrast, in testes, the dLSD1/dCoREST complex prevents transcription of germ line-inappropriate genes and is essential for spermatogenesis and fertility, whereas depletion of other dCoREST complexes has no effect. Our study uncovers three distinct dCoREST complexes that function in a lineage-restricted fashion to repress specific sets of genes thereby maintaining cell-type-specific gene expression programmes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document