scholarly journals 131. Antimicrobial Usage for Respiratory Infections in Urgent Care Settings within the University of Washington Medicine Network

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S77-S77
Author(s):  
Joanne Huang ◽  
Zahra Kassamali Escobar ◽  
Rupali Jain ◽  
Jeannie D Chan ◽  
John B Lynch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
University Of Washington ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory

Abstract Background In an effort to combat antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug events, The Joint Commission mandated expansion of antimicrobial stewardship programs into ambulatory healthcare settings Jan 2020. The most common diagnoses resulting in inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing are respiratory infections. This study aimed to assess the rate of antibiotic prescribing for viral respiratory tract infections within six urgent care clinics affiliated with University of Washington Medicine health system in Seattle, WA. Methods This was a retrospective observational study from Jan 2019-Feb 2020. We used the MITIGATE toolkit; a resource that meets CDC’s core elements for outpatient stewardship. Patients were identified based upon pre-specified ICD-10 codes for viral respiratory infections. The primary outcome was the rate of unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions for acute viral respiratory infections. Secondary outcomes evaluated inappropriate prescribing practices based on antibiotic selection, diagnosis, and age. Results Of 7,313 patients (6078 adults and 1235 pediatric) included, 23% were inappropriately prescribed antibiotics. The most common antibiotics inappropriately prescribed were azithromycin (62%), amoxicillin (13%), and doxycycline (13%). Fluoroquinolone (FQ) utilization was low (2%). Bronchitis (61%) and nonsuppurative otitis media (NSOM) (24%) were the most common viral diagnoses for which antibiotics were prescribed. Overall, unnecessary prescribing was lower in pediatrics than adults at 13% and 25%, respectively (p< 0.001). Adults were more often prescribed antibiotics inappropriately for bronchitis and NSOM compared to pediatrics (p=0.0013). Conclusion Inappropriate prescribing practices across six urgent care clinics varied based upon age and diagnosis. Azithromycin is most often inappropriately prescribed but the low rate of FQ prescribing is encouraging. The lower rate of unnecessary prescribing in pediatrics is promising although there is room for improvement as 1 in 8 children were unnecessarily prescribed antibiotics. These findings support the need for antibiotic stewardship in the outpatient setting, targeting areas for azithromycin use and therapeutic management of bronchitis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 143. Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Viral Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S82-S82
Author(s):  
Zahra Kassamali Escobar ◽  
Todd Bouchard ◽  
Jose Mari Lansang ◽  
Scott Thomassen ◽  
Joanne Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Specific Rate ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Viral Respiratory Infections

Abstract Background Between 15–50% of patients seen in ambulatory settings are prescribed an antibiotic. At least one third of this usage is considered unnecessary. In 2019, our institution implemented the MITIGATE Toolkit, endorsed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral respiratory infections in emergency and urgent care settings. In February 2020 we identified our first hospitalized patient with SARS-CoV(2). In March, efforts to limit person-to-person contact led to shelter in place orders and substantial reorganization of our healthcare system. During this time we continued to track rates of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Methods This was a single center observational study. Electronic medical record data were accessed to determine antibiotic prescribing and diagnosis codes. We provided monthly individual feedback to urgent care prescribers, (Sep 2019-Mar 2020), primary care, and ED providers (Jan 2020 – Mar 2020) notifying them of their specific rate of unnecessary antibiotic prescribing and labeling them as a top performer or not a top performer compared to their peers. The primary outcome was rate of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Results Pre toolkit intervention, 14,398 patient visits met MITIGATE inclusion criteria and 12% received an antibiotic unnecessarily in Jan-April 2019. Post-toolkit intervention, 12,328 patient visits met inclusion criteria and 7% received an antibiotic unnecessarily in Jan-April 2020. In April 2020, patient visits dropped to 10–50% of what they were in March 2020 and April 2019. During this time the unnecessary antibiotic prescribing rate doubled in urgent care to 7.8% from 3.6% the previous month and stayed stable in primary care and the ED at 3.2% and 11.8% respectively in April compared to 4.6% and 10.4% in the previous month. Conclusion Rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were reduced nearly in half from 2019 to 2020 across 3 ambulatory care settings. The increase in prescribing in April seen in urgent care and after providers stopped receiving their monthly feedback is concerning. Many factors may have contributed to this increase, but it raises concerns for increased inappropriate antibacterial usage as a side effect of the SARS-CoV(2) pandemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Pharmacist-Driven Implementation of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Algorithms Improves Guideline Adherence in the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002093097
Author(s):  
Kristin Stoll ◽  
Erik Feltz ◽  
Steven Ebert
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Guideline Adherence ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Selection Of

Background: Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics has been identified as the most important modifiable risk factor for antimicrobial resistance. Objective: The purpose of this project was to improve guideline adherence and promote optimal use of outpatient antibiotics in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Prescribing algorithms for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), and urinary tract infections (UTI) were developed to integrate clinical practice guideline recommendations with local ED antibiogram data. Outcomes were evaluated through chart review of patients prescribed outpatient antibiotics by ED providers. The primary outcome was adherence to clinical practice guidelines, defined as the selection of an appropriate antibiotic agent, dose, and duration of therapy for each patient discharged. Results: When compared to patients discharged from the ED prior to algorithm implementation (N = 325), the post-implementation group (N = 353) received more antibiotic prescriptions that were completely guideline adherent (61.5% vs 11.7%, P < .00001). Post-implementation discharge orders demonstrated improvement in the selection of an appropriate agent (87.3% vs 45.5%, P < .00001), dose (91.5% vs 77.2%, P < .00001), and duration of therapy (71.1% vs 39.1%, P < .01). Additionally, fluoroquinolone prescribing rates were reduced (2.3% vs 12.3%, P < .00001). A reduction in all-cause 30-day returns to the ED or urgent care was observed (15.3% vs 21.5%, P = .036). Conclusion: Pharmacist-driven implementation of antibiotic prescribing algorithms improved guideline adherence in the outpatient treatment of CAP, SSTI, and UTI.

scholarly journals Next-Generation Probiotics and Their Metabolites in COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 941
Author(s):  
Thomas Gautier ◽  
Sandrine David-Le Gall ◽  
Alaa Sweidan ◽  
Zohreh Tamanai-Shacoori ◽  
Anne Jolivet-Gougeon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Secondary Bile Acid ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory Infections ◽  
Gut Microbiota Composition ◽  
Viral Respiratory

Since December 2019, a global pandemic has been observed, caused by the emergence of a new coronavirus, SARS CoV-2. The latter is responsible for the respiratory disease, COVID-19. The infection is also characterized by renal, hepatic, and gastrointestinal dysfunctions suggesting the spread of the virus to other organs. A dysregulated immune response was also reported. To date, there is no measure to treat or prevent SARS CoV-2 infection. Additionally, as gut microbiota composition is altered in patients with COVID-19, alternative therapies using probiotics can be considered to fight SARS CoV-2 infection. This review aims at summarizing the current knowledge about next-generation probiotics (NGPs) and their benefits in viral respiratory tract infections and in COVID-19. We describe these bacteria, highlighted by studies using metagenomic approaches. In addition, these bacteria generate metabolites such as butyrate, desaminotyrosine, and secondary bile acid, suggested to prevent viral respiratory infections. Gut microbial metabolites transported via the circulation to the lungs could inhibit viral replication or improve the immune response against viruses. The use of probiotics and/or their metabolites may target either the virus itself and/or the immunologic process. However, this review showed that more studies are needed to determine the benefits of probiotics and metabolite products in COVID-19.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Prescribing for Canadian Preschool Children: Evidence of Overprescribing for Viral Respiratory Infections

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine E. L. Wang ◽  
Thomas R. Einarson ◽  
James D. Kellner ◽  
John M. Conly
Keyword(s):  
Preschool Children ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Viral Respiratory Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory

scholarly journals Outpatient Antibiotic Prescription Trends in the United States: A National Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Durkin ◽  
S. Reza Jafarzadeh ◽  
Kevin Hsueh ◽  
Ya Haddy Sallah ◽  
Kiraat D. Munshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
The United States ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Amoxicillin Clavulanate ◽  
Tract Infections

OBJECTIVETo characterize trends in outpatient antibiotic prescriptions in the United StatesDESIGNRetrospective ecological and temporal trend study evaluating outpatient antibiotic prescriptions from 2013 to 2015SETTINGNational administrative claims data from a pharmacy benefits manager PARTICIPANTS. Prescription pharmacy beneficiaries from Express Scripts Holding CompanyMEASUREMENTSAnnual and seasonal percent change in antibiotic prescriptionsRESULTSApproximately 98 million outpatient antibiotic prescriptions were filled by 39 million insurance beneficiaries during the 3-year study period. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were azithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, and cephalexin. No significant changes in individual or overall annual antibiotic prescribing rates were found during the study period. Significant seasonal variation was observed, with antibiotics being 42% more likely to be prescribed during February than September (peak-to-trough ratio [PTTR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39–1.61). Similar seasonal trends were found for azithromycin (PTTR, 2.46; 95% CI, 2.44–3.47), amoxicillin (PTTR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.42–1.89), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (PTTR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.68–2.29).CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates that annual national outpatient antibiotic prescribing practices remained unchanged during our study period. Furthermore, seasonal peaks in antibiotics generally used to treat viral upper respiratory tract infections remained unchanged during cold and influenza season. These results suggest that inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics remains widespread, despite the concurrent release of several guideline-based best practices intended to reduce inappropriate antibiotic consumption; however, further research linking national outpatient antibiotic prescriptions to associated medical conditions is needed to confirm these findings.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:584–589

Wheezing Associated With Respiratory Tract Infections In Children

1966 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldine L. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Respiratory Tract Infections ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory

This paper reviews the known relation ships of common acute bacterial and viral respiratory infections to the asth matic state and to wheezing attacks in children. Implications for treatment are discussed in view of what has already been learned and what we need to know.

scholarly journals 160. Urgent Care Prescriber Perspectives on Antibiotic Prescribing During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S190-S191
Author(s):  
Brooke Betts ◽  
David R Ha ◽  
Marisa Holubar ◽  
Marisa Holubar ◽  
Maja Artandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stability Robustness ◽  
Trained Interviewer

Abstract Background Urgent care practices were significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies conducted early in the pandemic demonstrated dramatic decreases in outpatient antibiotic prescribing, particularly amongst agents typically used for respiratory infections. We observed a 33% decline in urgent care antibiotics prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic in our urgent care clinics. We investigated the prescriber experience to elucidate factors influencing antibiotic use for respiratory conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic at two academic urgent care clinics. Methods We employed a mix method approach, first distributing a survey to all full-time prescribers. We then followed up with qualitative interviews (12 of 22 prescribers) which was conducted by a single, trained interviewer using a standardized guide. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Each transcription was independently reviewed and coded by two blinded investigators using standardized themes and adjudicated by a third investigator for stability, robustness, and interrater reliability. Individually, researchers identified and coded key themes and statements. These themes were then discussed as a group and combined where they shared meaning. This project was reviewed and deemed to be non-human subjects research by the Stanford University School of Medicine Panel on Human Subjects in Medical Research. Results A total of 20 of the 22 prescribers (13 MDs and 9 APPs) completed the survey (91% response rate). Notably, only 25% of prescribers agreed that COVID-19 had changed their antibiotic prescribing practices for patients with respiratory infections despite objective data that all prescribed less. In the qualitative interviews, we identified four major themes impacting the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing practices as shown in Table 1. Conclusion Urgent care prescribers attributed a decrease in antibiotic prescribing during COVID-19 to changes in patient expectations and knowledge base, a switch to telemedicine-based encounters, and changing epidemiology. These shifts could be utilized by outpatient antimicrobial stewardship efforts to sustain low prescribing rates for conditions in which antibiotics are generally not indicated. Disclosures Marisa Holubar, MD, MS, Nothing to disclose

Role of rapid diagnostics for viral respiratory infections in antibiotic prescribing decision in the emergency department

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 974-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
S. Lena Kang-Birken ◽  
Samantha K. Mathews ◽  
Catelynn E. Kenner ◽  
Lynn N. Fitzgibbons
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Rapid Diagnostics ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Abnormal Chest ◽  
Viral Respiratory Infections ◽  
Viral Respiratory

AbstractObjective:To describe the frequency of antibiotic prescriptions in patients with known viral respiratory infections (VRIs) diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 3 emergency departments (EDs) and to identify patient characteristics that influence the prescribing of antibiotics by ED physicians despite PCR confirmation of viral cause.Design:Retrospective, observational analysis of patients with PCR-diagnosed VRI discharged from 3 acute-care hospital EDs within 1 health system.Results:In total, 323 patients were discharged from the ED with a VRI diagnosis, of whom 68 were prescribed antibiotics (21.1%). These patients were older (median, 59.5 vs 43 years; P = .04), experienced symptoms longer (median, 4 vs 2 days; P = .002), were more likely to have received antibiotics in the preceding 7 days (27.9% vs 9.8%; P < .001), and had higher proportions of abnormal chest X-rays (64.5% vs 28.4%; P < .001). Patients were more likely to receive antibiotics for a diagnosis of pneumonia (39.7% vs 1.6%; P < .001) or otitis media (7.4% vs 0.4%; P = .002), and were less likely with diagnosis of upper respiratory infection (2.9% vs 13.7%; P = .02) or influenza (20.6% vs 44.3%; P < .001).Conclusions:Despite a diagnosis of VRI, one-fifth of ED patients were prescribed antibiotics. Patient characteristics including age, duration of symptoms, abnormal chest X-rays, and specific diagnosis may increase provider concern for concurrent bacterial infections. Opportunities exist for antimicrobial stewardship strategies to incorporate rapid diagnostics in promoting judicious antibiotic usage in the ED.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document