Napping behavior in adults with episodic migraine: a six-week prospective cohort study

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeliki Vgontzas ◽  
Elizabeth Mostofsky ◽  
Kobina Hagan ◽  
Michael Rueschman ◽  
Murray A Mittleman ◽  
...  

Abstract Study objectives Patients with migraine commonly endorse napping as a strategy for headache pain relief, but also experience high rates of sleep disturbance. To elucidate the relationship between napping behavior and migraine, we evaluated the association between napping and headache frequency, severity, and intensity among adults with episodic migraine. We also examined the association between daily napping and that night’s sleep. Methods In this six-week prospective cohort study, 97 adults with episodic migraine completed twice-daily headache and sleep electronic diaries and wore a wrist actigraph. We modeled the associations between napping (yes/no) and headaches with conditional logistic regression and daily napping and nighttime sleep with linear regression. Results Over 4,353 study days, participants reported 1,059 headache days and 389 days with naps. More than 80% of participants napped during the study, with mean nap duration of 76.7±62.4 minutes. Naps were more likely to occur on day 2 of headache 35/242 (14.5%) than on non-headache days 279/3294 (8.5%, OR 2.2 [95%CI 1.4,3.4]). Mean nap onset time (14:40h ± 3.3h) was later than headache onset (12:48h ± 5.3h). In adjusted models, napping was associated with an additional 1.1 (95%CI -1.4, 3.6) headache days/month. Naps were not associated with worse self-reported or objective sleep that night. Conclusions Our findings suggest that naps may be an uncommonly used behavioral strategy for prolonged migraine attacks and do not contribute to nightly sleep disturbance. Future studies are needed to examine the acute analgesic effects of daytime napping in patients with migraine.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 605-605
Author(s):  
B. K. Bennett ◽  
D. Goldstein ◽  
F. M. Boyle ◽  
P. L. De Souza ◽  
N. Wilcken ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kobina K. Hagan ◽  
Wenyuan Li ◽  
Elizabeth Mostofsky ◽  
Suzanne M. Bertisch ◽  
Angeliki Vgontzas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John Kubale ◽  
Guillermina Kuan ◽  
Lionel Gresh ◽  
Sergio Ojeda ◽  
Amy Schiller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Influenza may result in primary pneumonia or be associated with secondary bacterial pneumonia. While the association with secondary pneumonia has been established ecologically, individual-level evidence remains sparse and the risk period for pneumonia following influenza poorly defined. Methods We conducted a matched case-control study and a prospective cohort study among Nicaraguan children aged 0–14 years from 2011 through 2018. Physicians diagnosed pneumonia cases based on Integrated Management for Childhood Illness guidelines. Cases were matched with up to 4 controls on age (months) and study week. We fit conditional logistic regression models to assess the association between influenza subtype and subsequent pneumonia development, and a Bayesian nonlinear survival model to estimate pneumonia hazard following influenza. Results Participants with influenza had greater risk of developing pneumonia in the 30 days following onset compared to those without influenza (matched odds ratio [mOR], 2.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.9–3.9]). Odds of developing pneumonia were highest for participants following A(H1N1)pdm09 illness (mOR, 3.7 [95% CI, 2.0–6.9]), followed by influenza B and A(H3N2). Participants’ odds of pneumonia following influenza were not constant, showing distinct peaks 0–6 days (mOR, 8.3 [95% CI, 4.8–14.5] days) and 14–20 (mOR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.1–5.5] days) after influenza infection. Conclusions Influenza is a significant driver of both primary and secondary pneumonia among children. The presence of distinct periods of elevated pneumonia risk in the 30 days following influenza supports multiple etiological pathways.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document