Temporal Modifiers of the Radon-smoking Interaction

1994 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan Thomas ◽  
Janice Pogoda ◽  
Bryan Langholz ◽  
Wendy Mack
2020 ◽  
pp. 324-345
Author(s):  
Mariya L. Kuleshоva ◽  

The article compares the Slovenian particles še and že mainly with the Russian particles еще and уже. Unlike the Russian particle уже, the Slovenian particle že cannot be combined with the negative form of the verb: instead of it, the adverb več is used in such contexts. The most subtle differences between the Slovenian and Russian languages are found in the combinations of še and že with temporal modifiers, where the so-called “plot time” is characteristic of the Slovenian language. The event is interpreted as localized on the time axis, not from the perspective of the «speaker’s time», which is manifested in the possibility of using že in such contexts as umrl je že v devetnajstem stoletju (he died in the nineteenth century already). Moreover, že is not able to express the meaning ‘no earlier / no later than’, because the particle šele replaces it in this function. The author comes to the conclusion that Slovenian particles are more widely used as modal than their Russian equivalents. The particle še has numerous intensifying functions, correlating with the functions of Russian particles даже, еще и, и. The particle že can be used in the same way as two Russian words уже and уж. In contrast to уж, že does not always express displeasure and can add the meaning of a concession to the statement.


Respiration ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter D. van Dijk ◽  
Jacques W.M. Lenders ◽  
Joran Holtman ◽  
Joke Grootens ◽  
Reinier Akkermans ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy R. Bentley ◽  
◽  
Yun J. Sung ◽  
Michael R. Brown ◽  
Thomas W. Winkler ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-474
Author(s):  
Ellen Kuenzig ◽  
Herman W. Barkema ◽  
Bertus Eksteen ◽  
Cynthia H. Seow ◽  
Cheryl Barnabe ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 655-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Hsuan Chuang ◽  
Pei-Chen Lee ◽  
Tim Vlaar ◽  
Claire Mulot ◽  
Marie-Anne Loriot ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
F. Fanini ◽  
E. Fadda ◽  
E. Galimberti ◽  
V. Sani ◽  
V. Scavelli ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIn the past decades different evidences suggested a relationship between Panic Disorder (PD) and respiration, among which the presence of different respiratory irregularities at rest in PD patients. It has been hypothesized that PD could be characterized by a dysfunction of those areas involved in the central control of respiration. The aim of this study was to unravel possible differences in the respiratory patterns at rest between PD patients and healthy controls (HC). Moreover we investigate possible mechanisms linking smoking to respiration.MethodsRespiratory physiology has been assessed in 32 PD patients with Agoraphobia and 24 HC, for 15 consecutive minutes. Mean and standard deviation of respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (TV), minute ventilation (VE), and end-tidal CO2 (pCO2) have been assessed.ResultsNo significant difference between the two groups in all physiological indexes has been found. A significant diagnosis-by-smoking interaction has been found for RR and VT mean value (p < 0,05), that were significantly higher in non-smokers PD patients compared to non-smokers HC.ConclusionResults seem to suggest the existence of a peculiar equilibrium condition in PD patients. Respiratory system in PD responds to nicotine assumption differently from that of the HC. These data seem to be consistent with the hypothesis of a central homeostatic dysfunction in PD.Further studies are needed, that take in account age of onset of smoking and number of cigarettes smoked daily. Moreover investigation on the Homeostatic Brain’ functioning should need a more integrated consideration of the cardiac, respiratory and balance systems together.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document