Do Physical Therapists in the United Kingdom Recognize Psychosocial Factors in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain?

Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1316-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Bishop ◽  
Nadine E. Foster
2001 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 1018-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda C Li ◽  
Claire Bombardier

Abstract Background and Purpose. Since the release of acute low back pain management guidelines in 1994, little was known about the effect of these guidelines on clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to examine physical therapists' reported management of acute and subacute lumbar impairment. Subjects. One in 10 registered physical therapists who were randomly selected from southern Ontario, Canada, (n=454) and all registered physical therapists from northern Ontario (n=331) were surveyed. Methods. In the questionnaire, case scenarios covered 3 areas related to the management of lumbar impairment: (1) physical examination, (2) treatment and recommendations, and (3) therapists' beliefs regarding its management. Results. Five hundred sixty-nine questionnaires were returned (response rate=72.5%). Only data obtained for therapists (n=274) whose weekly workload included more than 10% of people with lumbar impairment were used in the analysis. Overall, patient education, exercise, and electrotherapeutic and thermal modalities were the preferred interventions for acute lumbar impairment (symptom onset of less than 5 weeks) with or without sciatica, whereas exercise and work modification were preferred for subacute lumbar impairment (symptom onset of 5 weeks or longer). There was a trend of using electrotherapeutic and thermal modalities of uncertain effectiveness. Only 46.3% of the therapists agreed or strongly agreed that practice guidelines were useful for managing lumbar impairment. Discussion and Conclusion. Although the physical therapists surveyed, in general, followed the guidelines in managing acute lumbar impairment, they felt uncertain regarding the value of practice guidelines. Future research should focus on identifying effective treatment approaches and exploring the effectiveness of practice guidelines.


Pain ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Jellema ◽  
Daniëlle A.W.M. van der Windt ◽  
Henriëtte E. van der Horst ◽  
Annette H. Blankenstein ◽  
Lex M. Bouter ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 430-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah GivensHeiss ◽  
David S. Fitch ◽  
Julie M. Fritz ◽  
Wendy J. Sanchez ◽  
Kay E Roberts ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 436-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Antunes Lopes ◽  
Rosângela Corrêa Dias ◽  
Bárbara Zille de Queiroz ◽  
Nayza Maciel de Britto Rosa ◽  
Leani de Souza Máximo Pereira ◽  
...  

Measurement instruments of pain catastrophizing for middle-aged and elderly individuals are needed to understand its impact on low back pain. The goals were to cross-culturally adapt the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, assess the construct validity through Rasch analysis, and verify reliability and convergent validity of pain catastrophizing with psychosocial factors. 131 individuals aged 55 years and older with acute low back pain were interviewed . The intra-rater reliability was Kp = 0.80 and interrater Kp = 0.75. The Rasch analysis found adequate reliability coefficients (0.95 for items and 0.90 for individuals ). The separation index for the elderly was 2.95 and 4.59 items. Of the 13 items, one did not fit the model, which was justified in the sample evaluated. The pain catastrophizing correlated with most psychosocial factors. The instrument proved to be clinically useful. Subsequent studies should carry out the same analysis in different populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document