scholarly journals D1-03: Treatment with irinotecan plus carboplatin prolongs survival without compromising quality of life in patients with small cell lung cancer, extensive disease (SCLC-ED). Results of a randomized phase III trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. S390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hermes ◽  
B Bergman ◽  
R Bremnes ◽  
L Eks ◽  
S Fluge ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1/2) ◽  
pp. 105-117
Author(s):  
Satoshi Morita ◽  
Kunihiko Kobayashi ◽  
Yasuo Ohashi ◽  
Kenji Eguchi ◽  
Masahiko Shibuya ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 825-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hürny ◽  
J. Bernhard ◽  
R. Joss ◽  
Y. Willems ◽  
F. Cavalli ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M. Rudd ◽  
N.H. Gower ◽  
S.G. Spiro ◽  
T.G. Eisen ◽  
P.G. Harper ◽  
...  

PurposeThis phase III randomized trial compared two chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine plus carboplatin and mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The regimens were compared with regard to effects on survival, response rates, toxicity, and quality of life.Patients and MethodsEligible patients had previously untreated stage IIIB or IV NSCLC suitable for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Randomly assigned patients were to receive four cycles, each at 3-week intervals, of carboplatin area under the curve of 5 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 (GCa) or mitomycin 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide 3g/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2on day 1 (MIC).ResultsBetween February 1999 and August 2001, 422 patients (GCa, n = 212; MIC, n = 210) were randomly assigned in the United Kingdom. The majority of patients received the intended four cycles (GCa, 64%; MIC, 61%). There was a significant survival advantage for GCa compared with MIC (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0. 93; P = .008). Median survival was 10 months with GCa and 7.6 months with MIC (difference, 2.4 months; 95% CI, 1.0 to 4.0), and 1-year survival was 40% with GCa and 30% with MIC (difference, 10%; 95% CI, 3% to 18%). Overall response rates were similar (42% for GCa v 41% for MIC; P = .84). More thrombocytopenia occurred with GCa (P = .03), but this was not associated with increased hospital admission or fatality. GCa caused less nausea, vomiting, constipation, and alopecia and was associated with fewer admissions for administration and better quality of life.ConclusionIn patients with advanced NSCLC, GCa chemotherapy was shown to be a better-tolerated treatment that conferred a survival advantage over MIC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document