Neurogeneticists Handle the Fallout from Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Gina Shaw
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Stein

Genetics has fascinated societies since ancient times, and references to traits or behaviors that appear to be shared or different among related individuals have permeated legends, literature, and popular culture. Biomedical advances from the past century, and particularly the discovery of the DNA double helix, the increasing numbers of links that were established between mutations and medical conditions or phenotypes, and technological advances that facilitated the sequencing of the human genome, catalyzed the development of genetic testing. Genetic tests were initially performed in health care facilities, interpreted by health care providers, and included the availability of counseling. Recent years have seen an increased availability of genetic tests that are offered by companies directly to consumers, a phenomenon that became known as direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Tests offered in this setting range from the ones that are also provided in health care establishments to tests known as ‘recreational genomics,’ and consumers directly receive the test results. In addition, testing in this context often does not involve the availability of counseling and, when this is provided, it frequently occurs on-line or over the phone. As a field situated at the interface between biotechnology, biomedical research, and social sciences, direct-to-consumer genetic testing opens multiple challenges that can be appropriately addressed only by developing a complex, inter-disciplinary framework.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
Louiza Kalokairinou ◽  
Pascal Borry ◽  
Heidi C Howard

Aim: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests (GT) have created controversy regarding their risks and benefits. In view of recent regulatory developments, this article aims to explore the attitudes of European clinical geneticists toward the oversight of DTC GT. Materials & methods: Fifteen semi-structured interviews were performed with clinical geneticists based in ten European countries. The transcripts were thematically analysized in an iterative process. Results & conclusion: Respondents strongly supported quality standards for DTC GT equal to those applied within the healthcare setting. Despite participants unanimously considering the involvement of healthcare professionals to be important, mandatory medical supervision was controversial. In this regard, promoting education and truth-in-advertising was considered as being key in maintaining a balance between protecting consumers and promoting their autonomy.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 736-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Borry

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry J. Kricka ◽  
Paolo Fortina ◽  
Yuan Mai ◽  
George P. Patrinos

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 3191-3193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy Gray ◽  
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document