In Vivo Monitoring of Sevoflurane-induced Adverse Effects in Neonatal Nonhuman Primates Using Small-animal Positron Emission Tomography

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Zhang ◽  
Shuliang Liu ◽  
Glenn D. Newport ◽  
Merle G. Paule ◽  
Ralph Callicott ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Animals exposed to sevoflurane during development sustain neuronal cell death in their developing brains. In vivo micro-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography imaging has been utilized as a minimally invasive method to detect anesthetic-induced neuronal adverse effects in animal studies. Methods Neonatal rhesus monkeys (postnatal day 5 or 6, 3 to 6 per group) were exposed for 8 h to 2.5% sevoflurane with or without acetyl-l-carnitine (ALC). Control monkeys were exposed to room air with or without ALC. Physiologic status was monitored throughout exposures. Depth of anesthesia was monitored using quantitative electroencephalography. After the exposure, microPET/computed tomography scans using 18F-labeled fluoroethoxybenzyl-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl) acetamide (FEPPA) were performed repeatedly on day 1, 1 and 3 weeks, and 2 and 6 months after exposure. Results Critical physiologic metrics in neonatal monkeys remained within the normal range during anesthetic exposures. The uptake of [18F]-FEPPA in the frontal and temporal lobes was increased significantly 1 day or 1 week after exposure, respectively. Analyses of microPET images recorded 1 day after exposure showed that sevoflurane exposure increased [18F]-FEPPA uptake in the frontal lobe from 0.927 ± 0.04 to 1.146 ± 0.04, and in the temporal lobe from 0.859 ± 0.05 to 1.046 ± 0.04 (mean ± SE, P < 0.05). Coadministration of ALC effectively blocked the increase in FEPPA uptake. Sevoflurane-induced adverse effects were confirmed by histopathologic evidence as well. Conclusions Sevoflurane-induced general anesthesia during development increases glial activation, which may serve as a surrogate for neurotoxicity in the nonhuman primate brain. ALC is a potential protective agent against some of the adverse effects associated with such exposures.

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christin Neuber ◽  
Sabine Schulze ◽  
Yvonne Förster ◽  
Frank Hofheinz ◽  
Johanna Wodke ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (50) ◽  
pp. 7259-7262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhao Li ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Xiaojia Qin ◽  
Yong Deng ◽  
Jianping Zhang ◽  
...  

A fluorine-18 doped bismuth upconversion luminescence (UCL) nanoprobe (18F-UNBOF) was quickly synthesized within 1 min at room temperature, and it could be utilized for computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) and UCL imaging in vivo.


1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Rogers ◽  
Sharon Stone-Elander ◽  
Martin Ingvar ◽  
Lars Eriksson ◽  
Stanley M. Parsons ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (25) ◽  
pp. 2705-2711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Lale Kostakoglu ◽  
Jan Maciej Zaucha ◽  
Bogdan Malkowski ◽  
Alberto Biggi ◽  
...  

Purpose Negative [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) –positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) after two cycles of chemotherapy indicates a favorable prognosis in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We hypothesized that the negative predictive value would be even higher in patients responding rapidly enough to be PET negative after one cycle. This prospective study aimed to assess the prognostic value of PET after one cycle of chemotherapy in HL and to assess the dynamics of FDG uptake after one cycle (PET1) and after two cycles (PET2). Patients and Methods All PET scans were read by two blinded, independent reviewers in different countries, according to the Deauville five-point scale. The main end point was progression-free survival (PFS) after 2 years. Results A total of 126 patients were included, and all had PET1; 89 patients had both PET1 and PET2. The prognostic value of PET1 was statistically significant with respect to both PFS and overall survival. Two-year PFS for PET1-negative and PET1-positive patients was 94.1% and 40.8%, respectively. Among those with both PET1 and PET2, 2-year PFS was 98.3% and 38.5% for PET1-negative and PET1-positive patients and 90.2% and 23.1% for PET2-negative and PET2-positive patients, respectively. No PET1-negative patient was PET2 positive. Conclusion PET after one cycle of chemotherapy is highly prognostic in HL. No other prognostic tool identifies a group of patients with HL with a more favorable outcome than those patients with a negative PET1. In the absence of precise pretherapeutic predictive markers, PET1 is the best method for response-adapted strategies designed to select patients for less intensive treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document