Resident Involvement in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion is Associated With Increased Readmissions and Operative Time, But No Increased Short-term Risks

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy H. Lan ◽  
Daniel Grits ◽  
Linsen T. Samuel ◽  
Assem A. Sultan
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Resident Involvement

scholarly journals A comparative study of functional outcome between posterior lumbar fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 544
Author(s):  
Harpreet Singh ◽  
Dhruv Patel ◽  
Sangam Tyagi ◽  
Krushna Saoji ◽  
Tilak Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Fusion

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Spondylolisthesis is condition in which one vertebra slips over other vertebra. This study has been done to compare the functional outcome and complications of two techniques: posterior lumbar fusion (intertransverse fusion) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Total 20 patients with spondylolisthesis admitted in a tertiary care centre in Rajasthan were allotted alternatively in posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) group and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) group. In PLF, fusion was done by placing bone graft between transverse processes and around facets. In PLIF, fusion was bone by placing cage in between vertebral bodies.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> 20 patients were included in our study with female predominance (65%). Mean age was 54.2 years (PLF=58.4 and PLIF=50.2). 70% patients have L4-L5 level spondylolisthesis. Average operative time was less in PLF group, which is statistically significant. Functional outcome was measured by using visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Japanese orthopedics association score (JOAS) at 3 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. There is a significant decrease between preoperative VAS and at 6 months, in both PLF and PLIF group. JOAS was significantly increased at 6 months in both PLF and PLIF group as compared to preoperative score. But difference in JOAS at 6 months is not significant between PLF and PLIF.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Both PLF and PLIF are equally effective for spondylolisthesis. Both techniques have same satisfactory results. As PLIF is more invasive technique, more operative time and more complications are seen.</p>

Surgical treatment of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deyong Song ◽  
Zhong Chen ◽  
Dewei Song
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Unusual Case ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Isthmic Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Short Term

Isthmic spondylolisthesis, which is demonstrated in 4%–6% of the general population, is one of the most common types of spondylolisthesis. However, double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis is extremely rare. Only a few reports have examined the outcomes of surgical treatment of double-level spondylolisthesis. The authors present an unusual case of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. The patient had low-back pain for 20 years and did not respond to conservative treatment. Radiographs revealed bilateral pars defects at L-4 and L-5. Grade 2 isthmic spondylolisthesis was present, both at L4–5 and at L5–S1. The patient underwent decompression, reduction, and posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autogenous bone chips from posterior decompression. At follow-up after 12 months, the patient was free of pain, slippage was corrected, and fusion was achieved. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation and reduction may yield good functional short-term results for double-level spondylolisthesis.

scholarly journals Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822097233
Author(s):  
Takahiro Makino ◽  
Shota Takenaka ◽  
Yusuke Sakai ◽  
Hideki Yoshikawa ◽  
Takashi Kaito
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cyst Formation ◽  
Porous Titanium ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Vertebral Endplate ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
Cage Group

Study Design: Clinical case series. Objectives: To compare the short-term (≤1 year) radiographical and clinical outcomes between posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with a titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone (TCP) cage and PLIF with a three-dimensional porous titanium alloy (PTA) cage. Methods: Overall, 63 patients who had undergone 1- or 2-level PLIF since March 2015 were enrolled (median age, 71 years). The first 34 patients underwent PLIF with TCP cages (until June 2017) and the next 29 patients with PTA cages. Fusion status, vertebral endplate cyst formation (cyst sign: grade 0, none; grade 1, focal; and grade 2, diffuse), cage subsidence (grade 0, <1 mm; grade 1, 1–3 mm; and grade 2, >3 mm), and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes based on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were compared at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively between the 2 cage groups. Results: Cyst sign and cage subsidence grades were significantly lower in the PTA cage group than in the TCP cage group at 6 months postoperatively (cyst sign, p = 0.044; cage subsidence, p = 0.043). In contrast, the fusion rate and surgery effectiveness based on JOABPEQ at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Patient-reported QOL outcomes were similar between the TCP and PTA cage groups until 1 year postoperatively. However, a higher incidence and severity of postoperative vertebral endplate cyst formation in patients with the TCP cage was a noteworthy radiographical finding.

Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (18) ◽  
pp. E1172-E1178
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Nakashima ◽  
Tokumi Kanemura ◽  
Kotaro Satake ◽  
Kenyu Ito ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Indirect Decompression
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document