Prevalence and Risk Factors of Stress Cardiomyopathy After Convulsive Status Epilepticus in ICU Patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 2164-2170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Belcour ◽  
Julien Jabot ◽  
Benjamin Grard ◽  
Arnaud Roussiaux ◽  
Cyril Ferdynus ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1505
Author(s):  
Claire Roger ◽  
Benjamin Louart

Beta-lactams are the most commonly prescribed antimicrobials in intensive care unit (ICU) settings and remain one of the safest antimicrobials prescribed. However, the misdiagnosis of beta-lactam-related adverse events may alter ICU patient management and impact clinical outcomes. To describe the clinical manifestations, risk factors and beta-lactam-induced neurological and renal adverse effects in the ICU setting, we performed a comprehensive literature review via an electronic search on PubMed up to April 2021 to provide updated clinical data. Beta-lactam neurotoxicity occurs in 10–15% of ICU patients and may be responsible for a large panel of clinical manifestations, ranging from confusion, encephalopathy and hallucinations to myoclonus, convulsions and non-convulsive status epilepticus. Renal impairment, underlying brain abnormalities and advanced age have been recognized as the main risk factors for neurotoxicity. In ICU patients, trough concentrations above 22 mg/L for cefepime, 64 mg/L for meropenem, 125 mg/L for flucloxacillin and 360 mg/L for piperacillin (used without tazobactam) are associated with neurotoxicity in 50% of patients. Even though renal complications (especially severe complications, such as acute interstitial nephritis, renal damage associated with drug induced hemolytic anemia and renal obstruction by crystallization) remain rare, there is compelling evidence of increased nephrotoxicity using well-known nephrotoxic drugs such as vancomycin combined with beta-lactams. Treatment mainly relies on the discontinuation of the offending drug but in the near future, antimicrobial optimal dosing regimens should be defined, not only based on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets associated with clinical and microbiological efficacy, but also on PK/toxicodynamic targets. The use of dosing software may help to achieve these goals.


2019 ◽  
pp. 629-650
Author(s):  
Pete Murphy ◽  
Sarah Stibbards

This chapter is meant as a brief guide to the immediate management of medical emergencies that an anaesthetist may be called to assist with. It is not intended as an in-depth text on the conditions covered. The severity and immediate management of acute asthma are detailed, including tips on induction and ventilation strategies. An overview of bronchiolitis includes presentation, risk factors, medical management, and tips on intubation and ventilation. Convulsive status epilepticus is a common referral, and its causes, treatment and indications for intubation and early extubation are discussed. Diabetic ketoacidosis management is described, specifically including the treatment of cerebral oedema. A common cause of mortality and morbidity in children is sepsis, and in this final section of the chapter the ‘Sepsis 6’ approach is taken.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 478-484
Author(s):  
A. Maldonado ◽  
W. Ramos ◽  
J. Pérez ◽  
L.A. Huamán ◽  
E.L. Gutiérrez

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Deng Chen ◽  
Li-na Zhu ◽  
ling liu

Abstract Purpose: To study the risk factors and prognosis of malnutrition in patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus. Methods: A total of 73 patients with refractory convulsive epileptic status in West China Hospital from January 2017 to May 2019 were collected. All patients met the 2016 International Anti-epileptic Alliance diagnostic criteria for refractory convulsive status epilepticus. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the risk factors of malnutrition in refractory convulsive status epilepticus. Results: Of the 73 patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus, 33 (45.21%) suffered from malnutrition during hospitalization, and hospitalization days (OR =1.251; 95% CI: 1.067-1.384; P =0.007), nasal feeding (OR =22.623; 95% CI: 1.091-286.899; P =0.013), and malnutrition on admission (OR =30.760; 95% CI: 1.064-89.797; P =0.046) were risk factors for malnutrition in patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus. Conclusion: Malnutrition is a common complication during hospitalization in patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus. Hospitalization days, nasal feeding, and malnutrition at admission are risk factors for malnutrition in patients with refractory convulsive status epilepticus. Further longitudinal studies are needed to identify the relationship between refractory convulsive status epilepticus and adverse outcomes.


Author(s):  
Sebastian Pollandt ◽  
Lori Shutter

Seizures are a common problem in intensive care units (ICU) and the advent of continuous electroencephalography is demonstrating that the incidence of seizures is still underestimated. Many patients considered encephalopathic from any cause are now found to be in non-convulsive status epilepticus. While the significance of non-convulsive seizures remains unclear, there is little disagreement that these seizures should be treated with antiseizure agents and prevention of any type of seizure is a reasonable therapeutic goal. Many antiseizure agents have been studied in ICU populations and extensive experience exists with drugs such as phenytoin, valproate, or pentobarbital. Since the previous edition of this textbook, several new antiseizure agents have been introduced. Levetiracetam, topiramate, and lacosamide have been established as reasonable pharmacologic options, in particular for treatment of status epilepticus. Patients with seizures in the ICU often present with challenging clinical scenarios, which influence the choice of antiseizure agents. For example, reduced liver or renal function, especially if needing continuous renal replacement therapy or intermittent haemodialysis, has an impact on drug level variability and susceptibility to seizure development. ICU patients will typically require a multitude of pharmacological agents for their specific clinical situation and drug–drug interactions must be considered. Additionally, many medications used in ICUs are associated with seizures, in particular, certain antibiotics. Overall, the development of new drugs and better monitoring methods will undoubtedly improve our ability to control seizures in ICU patients, but currently no treatment has been shown to be universally effective for challenges, such as refractory status epilepticus.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e47474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Loddenkemper ◽  
Tanvir U. Syed ◽  
Sriram Ramgopal ◽  
Deepak Gulati ◽  
Sikawat Thanaviratananich ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A346.1-A346
Author(s):  
D Boumendil ◽  
MA Negadi ◽  
K Elhalimi ◽  
H Bouguetof ◽  
Z Mentouri

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuko Laccheo ◽  
Hasan Sonmezturk ◽  
Amar B. Bhatt ◽  
Luke Tomycz ◽  
Yaping Shi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Gutierrez ◽  
Merry Chen ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Sudhakar Tummala

Abstract Background Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is present in 10–30% of ICU patients with altered mental status (AMS) and is associated to poor outcomes. To our knowledge, there is no data describing the prevalence and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with AMS associated to non-convulsive seizures (NCS) or NCSE. We aim to describe the outcomes and risk factors of critically ill cancer patients with encephalopathy associated with non-convulsive seizures (NCS). Methods This is a 3-year prospective observational study in a mixed oncological ICU at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Data of ICU patients with moderate to severe encephalopathy (Glasgow Coma Score < 13) that underwent EEG monitoring to rule out NCS were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors and outcomes. Results Of the 317 patients with encephalopathy who underwent EEG monitoring, 14.5% had NCS. Known risk factors such as sepsis, CNS infection, antibiotics, and cardiac arrest were not associated with increased risk of NCS. Patients with NCS were more likely to have received recent chemotherapy (41.3% vs 21.4%; p = 0.0036), have a CNS disease (39% vs 24.4%; p = 0.035), and abnormal brain imaging (60.9% vs 44.6%; p = 0.041). Patients with lower SOFA scores, normal renal function, and absence of shock were likely to have NCS as the cause of their encephalopathy (p < 0.03). After multivariate analysis, only abnormal brain imaging and absence of renal failure were associated with NCS. Mortality was significantly lower in patients with non-convulsive seizures when compared to those without seizures (45.7% vs 64%; p = 0.022); however, there was no significant association of seizures and mortality on a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusions NCS in critically ill cancer patients is associated with abnormalities on brain imaging and lower prevalence of organ failure. Diagnosis and treatment of NCS should be a priority in encephalopathic cancer patients, as they can have lower mortality than non-seizing patients. Opposite to other populations, NCS should not be considered a poor prognostic factor in critically ill encephalopathic cancer patients as they reflect a reversible cause for altered mentation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document