scholarly journals Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Two Different Negative Pressure Therapy Systems in Closed Incision Management

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e2259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devinder P. Singh ◽  
Allen Gabriel ◽  
Ronald P. Silverman ◽  
Leah P. Griffin ◽  
Lucy D’Agostino McGowan ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-172
Author(s):  
Yaomin Li ◽  
Bei Wu ◽  
Yancheng Liu

Background. Negative-pressure wound therapy is applied increasingly to manage closed wounds. However, no consensus has been reached with regard to surgical site infection and wound complication. Aim. To evaluate the effect of negative pressure therapy on closed wounds after orthopedic surgeries. Methods. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched from 1966 to January 2019; the references in the identified studies were also searched. Results. Ten studies on arthroplasty and 3 studies on fractures were included. Significantly few infections appeared in the negative pressure group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.18-0.46, P < .001; I2 = 0%, P = .80). There was no significant difference for other complications (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21-1.39, P = .20; I2 = 81%, P < .001). Few patients needed reoperation in the negative pressure group (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.14-0.53, P < .001; I2 = 0%, P = .82). Conclusion. Negative pressure therapy can decrease surgical site infection and reoperation of closed incisions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (1S) ◽  
pp. 41S-46S ◽  
Author(s):  
Devinder P. Singh ◽  
Allen Gabriel ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
Michael J. Gardner ◽  
Ralph D’Agostino

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Almansa-Saura ◽  
Víctor Lopez-Lopez ◽  
Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov ◽  
Marcel Schneider ◽  
Gregorio Castellanos-Escrig ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document