Treatment Results and Prognostic Factors of Brain Metastases From Ovarian Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience of 56 Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1631-1638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Woong Kwon ◽  
Joon Ho Yoon ◽  
Myong Cheol Lim ◽  
Jungnam Joo ◽  
Heon Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

ObjectivesThe most appropriate treatments for brain metastases from ovarian cancer have not been established mainly because of its rarity. The objective of this study was to describe clinical results of treatment and prognostic factors of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer treated at a single institution.Materials and MethodsWe retrieved information from the electronic medical records of 56 consecutive patients (2.8%) with brain metastases, from a total of 2008 patients with ovarian cancer. Endpoints were the pattern of treatment failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS).ResultsRadiation was the most common initial treatment for brain metastases (59%), followed by surgery (23%). The median progression-free survival was 9.8 months. Radiological progression was confirmed in 20 patients: 7 had leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (37%), 8 had local recurrence, and 5 had distant recurrence. Median OS was 11.25 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 48.2%. Patients received surgery for single metastasis as initial treatment showed median OS of 24.1 months, which was significantly prolonged compared with the other patients (P = 0.0002). Of the 48 patients who died, 29 (60%) died of systemic disease and 7 (15%) died of central nervous system progression. Karnofsky Performance Status greater than or equal to 70, control of systemic cancer, serous histology, and surgery for brain metastases were associated with improved OS in multivariable analysis (P < 0.05).ConclusionsSurgical resection for single or symptomatic brain metastases from ovarian cancer prolonged OS significantly. Multimodality treatment, including control of systemic cancer, appeared to be an important factor in prolonging OS.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Early Mortality After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: a Single Institutional Retrospective Review

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Emily Bennett ◽  
Michael A Vogelbaum ◽  
Gene H Barnett ◽  
Lilyana Angelov ◽  
Samuel Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Prognostic Groups ◽  
Prior Surgery

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used commonly for patients with brain metastases (BM) to improve intracranial disease control. However, survival of these patients is often dictated by their systemic disease course. The value of SRS becomes less clear in patients with anticipated short survival. OBJECTIVE To evaluate prognostic factors, which may predict early death (within 90 d) after SRS. METHODS A total of 1427 patients with BM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). There were 1385 cases included in this study; 1057 patients underwent upfront SRS and 328 underwent salvage SRS. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality within 90 d after first SRS. Multivariate analyses were performed to develop prognostic indices. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-six patients (19%, 95% confidence interval 17%-21%) died within 90 d after SRS. Multivariate analysis of upfront SRS patients showed that Karnofsky Performance Status, primary tumor type, extracranial metastases, age at SRS, boost treatment, total tumor volume, prior surgery, and interval from primary to BM were independent prognostic factors for 90-d mortality. The first 4 factors were also independent predictors in patients treated with salvage SRS. Based on these factors, an index was defined for each group that categorized patients into 3 and 2 prognostic groups, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 5% to 7% in the most favorable cohort and 36% to 39% in the least favorable. CONCLUSION Indices based on readily available patient, clinical, and treatment factors that are highly predictive of early death in patients treated with upfront or salvage SRS can be calculated and used to define well-separated prognostic groups.

A randomized trial comparing cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer.

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 965-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
P F Conte ◽  
M Bruzzone ◽  
S Chiara ◽  
M R Sertoli ◽  
M G Daga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Second Look

After primary surgery, 125 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 1c + IIb + IIc = 22 patients, FIGO III = 82 patients, FIGO IV = 21 patients) were randomly allocated to receive PC (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days) (corrected) or PAC (PC + doxorubicin 45 mg/m2). After six cycles, patients clinically disease-free or with resectable residual disease were submitted to second-look surgery. After restaging, patients in surgical complete response (CR) stopped treatment while those responding partially (PR) received six more courses; patients whose disease progressed were excluded from the study. Among patients with measurable disease, the following clinical response rates were observed: PC = 20% CR, 34.3% PR, 14.3% stable disease, and 31.4% progression; PAC = 40.6% CR, 15.6% PR, 12.5% stable disease, and 31.3% progression. In the 75 patients submitted to second look, the results have been the following: PC = 39.5% CR, 36.8% PR, 7.9% stable disease, and 15.8% progression; PAC = 62.2% CR, 18.9% PR, 10.8% stable disease, and 8.1% progression. The difference in surgical complete response in favor of the PAC regimen is significant (P less than .05). Median survival and progression-free survival were 800 and 400 days, respectively, for PAC arm; median survival and progression-free survival were 680 and 380 days, respectively, for PC. These differences are not significant. Probability of survival was affected by FIGO stage, amount of residual disease, histology, performance status, and response at second look, while no influence was observed according to grade of tumor differentiation and age. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of doxorubicin in terms of surgical CR.

scholarly journals Factors influencing the outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with five or more brain metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hamel-Perreault ◽  
D. Mathieu ◽  
L. Masson-Cote
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Treatment Volume ◽  
Extracranial Disease

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) for patients with 5 or more brain metastases (bmets) is a matter of debate. We report our results with that approach and the factors influencing outcome.Methods In the 103 patients who underwent srs for the treatment of 5 or more bmets, primary histology was nonsmall- cell lung cancer (57% of patients). All patients were grouped by Karnofsky performance status and recursive partitioning analysis (rpa) classification. In our cohort, 72% of patients had uncontrolled extracranial disease, and 28% had stable or responding systemic disease. Previous irradiation for 1–4 bmets had been given to 56 patients (54%). The mean number of treated bmets was 7 (range: 5–19), and the median cumulative bmets volume was 2 cm3 (range: 0.06–28 cm3).Results Multivariate analyses showed that stable extracranial disease (p < 0.001) and rpa (p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (os). Moreover, a cumulative treated bmets volume of less than 6 cm3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 4.99) was associated with better os. The total number of bmets had no effect on survival (p = 0.206). No variable was found to be predictive of local control. The rpa was significant (p = 0.027) in terms of distant recurrence.Conclusions Our study suggests that srs is a reasonable option for the management of patients with 5 or more bmets, especially with a cumulative treatment volume of less than 6 cm3.

Do gender and race influence survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases? An outcomes study utilizing the RTOG RPA class stratification

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7153-7153
Author(s):  
G. M. Videtic ◽  
C. A. Reddy ◽  
S. T. Chao ◽  
T. W. Rice ◽  
D. J. Adelstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Gender And Race ◽  
Class Stratification

7153 Background: To explore gender, race and their interactions in the setting of NSCLC brain metastases only, a single-institution brain database was analyzed, using the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) brain metastases classification. Methods: From 1/82 to 9/04, 831 NSCLC pts with brain metastases were registered. RPA criteria for analysis were: class I- Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70, age<65 years, primary tumor controlled, no extracranial metastases; class III- KPS<70; class II- all others. Results: Median follow-up was 5.4 months (m) (range 0–122.9). Median age was 62.4 (range 25–90). Median KPS was 80 (range 20–100). There were 485 males [M] (58.4%) and 346 females [F] (41.6%). 824 pts (99%) were either African-American (AA; n = 142[17%]) or White (W; n = 682[83%]). Pts characteristics were balanced when stratified by RPA class and by treatments. Median survival (MS) in months from time of brain metastasis diagnosis for all pts was 5.8. MS in months by gender [F vs. M] and race [W vs. AA] was: 6.3 vs. 5.5, p = 0.013; 6.0 vs. 5.2, p = 0.08, respectively. By RPA class for gender, MS trends (in months) favored F over M in classes I and II but not III: 17.1 vs. 9.5 (p = 0.11); 6.8 vs. 6.0 (p = 0.09), 2.7 vs. 2.5 (p = 0.42), respectively. By RPA class for gender and race, MS trends (in months) favored AAF over AAM in classes I and II but not III: 30.0 vs. 12.4, p = 0.50; 11.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.021; 3.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.64, respectively; and WF over WM in classes I but not II or III: 14.4 vs. 9.5, p = 0.11; 6.6 vs. 6.3, p = 0.38; 2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.49, respectively. On multivariable analysis, significant variables were gender (p = 0.041; RR 0.83); RPA class (p < 0.0001; RR 0.28, for I vs. III; p < 0.0001; RR 0.51, for II vs. III). Conclusions: Gender significantly influences NSCLC brain metastasis survival while race trends to significance. MS trends by RTOG RPA class suggest race may interact with genderprimarily in class I but pt numbers limited significance. Further characterization of these factors is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Brain metastases in patients treated with targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 326-326
Author(s):  
H. Alharbi ◽  
T. K. Choueiri ◽  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
S. North ◽  
M. J. MacKenzie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Brain

326 Background: Patients with brain metastases from advanced RCC treated in the targeted therapy era are not well characterized. Methods: Data from patients with mRCC treated with targeted therapy were collected through the International mRCC Database Consortium from 6 centers. Results: One hundred six out of 705 (15%) patients with mRCC had brain metastases. Forty-seven patients had brain metastases at the start of first-line anti-VEGF therapy and the rest developed metastases during follow-up. Of the patients with brain metastases, 6%, 68%, and 26% were in the favorable, intermediate and poor prognosis groups, respectively, per the Heng et al JCO 2009 criteria. Ninety percent had cerebral metastases, 17% had cerebellar metastases, 40% had a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80%, and 81% had symptoms of brain metastases. The median largest size and number of brain metastases was 1.8 cm (range 0.2–6.6) and 1 (range 1–20), respectively. Patients were treated with first-line sunitinib (n=77), sorafenib (n=23), bevacizumab (n=5), and temsirolimus (n=1). Local disease treatment included whole brain radiotherapy (81%), stereotactic radiosurgery (25%), and neurosurgery (25%). The brain metastases of 59 patients were evaluable and based on the local treatment and/or targeted therapy achieved 7 (12%) complete responses, 23 (39%) partial responses, 14 (24%) patients with stable disease, and 15 (25%) patients with progressive disease in the brain metastases. Patients with more than 4 brain metastases vs. those with no more than 4 have an overall survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis of 3.9 vs. 15.4 months (p=0.0051). Previous nephrectomy, sarcomatoid, and non-clear cell histology are not associated with development of brain metastases. On multivariable analysis, KPS<80% (p=0.0139), diagnosis to treatment with targeted therapy <1 year (p=0.0012), and higher number of brain metastases (p=0.0311) were associated with worse survival from diagnosis of brain metastases. Conclusions: In patients with brain metastases from RCC, KPS at start of therapy, diagnosis to treatment time and number of brain metastases may be prognostic factors for overall survival. [Table: see text]

A multicentered population-based analysis of outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who do not meet eligibility criteria for clinical trials.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 353-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Yick Chin Heng ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Lauren Christine Harshman ◽  
Georg A. Bjarnason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Number Of Patients

353 Background: Clinical trials have strict eligibility criteria to maintain internal validity. These criteria exclude many patients to whom the trial results are later applied to in clinical practice. Patients that do not meet eligibility criteria are poorly characterized. Methods: mRCC patients treated with VEGF targeted therapy were retrospectively deemed ineligible for clinical trials (according to commonly used inclusion/exclusion criteria) if they had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) < 70%, brain metastases, non-clear cell histology, hemoglobin ≤ 9 g/dL, creatinine > 2x the upper limit of normal, platelet count of < 100x103/uL, neutrophil count < 1500/mm3 or corrected calcium ≤ 12 mg/dL. Results: 894/2076 (43%) patients were deemed ineligible for clinical trials by the above criteria. Between ineligible versus eligible patients, the response rate, median progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival of first-line targeted therapy were 21% vs 29%, 5.2 vs 8.8 months and 14.5 vs 28.8 months (all p < 0.0001), respectively. Second-line PFS (if applicable) was 3.2 months in the trial ineligible vs 4.4 months in the trial eligible patients (p = 0.0074). When adjusted by the Heng et al prognostic categories, the hazard ratio for death between trial ineligible vs trial eligible patients was 1.621 (95% CI = 1.431–1.836, p < 0.0001). If only KPS, brain metastases and non-clear cell histology were used as exclusion criteria, 672 (32%) patients were excluded and the results were similar. Conclusions: The number of patients that are ineligible for clinical trials is high and their outcomes are inferior. Designing more inclusive clinical trials for this “ineligible” patient population are needed. [Table: see text]

Reintroduction of oxaliplatin for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 630-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Sasaki ◽  
Mizutomo Azuma ◽  
Wasaburo Koizumi ◽  
Tomohisa Egawa ◽  
Atsushi Nagashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Better Than

630 Background: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin seems to have clinical benefits for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens. A interim analysis of RE-OPEN study reported 38.9% of disease control rate (DCR) in ASCO GI 2013, but it is still unknown who will receive benefits from reintroduction of oxaliplatin. Methods: Among patients in whom oxaliplatin was reintroduced in the 7 participating hospitals, we retrospectively studied patients who had previously received oxaliplatin and irinotecan and patients who had a response of stable disease or better during initial treatment with oxaliplatin. Results: From June 2009 through January 2013, oxaliplatin was reintroduced in 53 patients (31 men and 22 women). The median age was 64 years, and the performance status was 0 in 24 patients and 1 in 29. The reasons for discontinuing initial treatment with oxaliplatin were progressive disease in 36 patients, adverse events in 14 and others in 3. The response rate (RR), DCR, the median progression-free survival (PFS), and the median overall survival were 3.8%, 47.2%, 105 days, and 313 days, respectively. As for adverse events, allergic reactions to oxaliplatin (grade 1 or higher) occurred in 26% of the patients. RR, DCR, and PFS in 44 patients with the oxaliplatin-free-interval (OFI) over 6 months were 4.6%, 54.6%, and 119 days, respectively, and were statistically better than those in 9 patients with OFI less than 6 months (0%, 11.1%, and 84 days). Reintroduction of oxaliplatin with bevacizumab showed better PFS than that without bevacizumab (114 days and 78 days, respectively). Conclusions: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin was suggested to be one option for the management of colorectal cancer that is resistant to standard therapy, especially in patients with OFI over 6 months. Bevacizumab may enhance the results of reintroduction treatment.

scholarly journals Impact of Superselective Intra-Arterial and Systemic Chemoradiotherapy for Gingival Carcinoma; Analysis of Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicity between radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACRT) and RT with concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: Median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT group: 60 Gy; SCRT group:69 Gy). At 3 years, the two groups significantly differed in overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.00–87.62; SCRT: 50.37%, 95% CI: 27.58–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.64%, 95% CI: 62.69–85.17; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.028) and local control (LC; IACRT: 77.17%, 95% CI: 64.23–86.41; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with poor OS (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had significantly worse PFS.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. IACRT is an effective and organ-preserving treatment for GC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with lung oligometastases

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goda Kalinauskaite ◽  
Ingeborg Tinhofer ◽  
Marcus Kufeld ◽  
Anne Kathrin Kluge ◽  
Arne Grün ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Patients with oligometastatic disease can potentially be cured by using an ablative therapy for all active lesions. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment option that lately proved to be as effective and safe as surgery in treating lung metastases (LM). However, it is not clear which patients benefit most and what are the most suitable fractionation regimes. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes after single fraction radiosurgery (SFRS) and fractionated SBRT (fSBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases and identify prognostic clinical features for better survival outcomes. Methods: Fifty-two patients with 94 LM treated with SFRS or fSBRT between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. The characteristics of primary tumor, LM, treatment, toxicity profiles and outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used for estimation of local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival and distant metastases free survival (DMFS). Results: Ninety-four LM in 52 patients were treated using SFRS/fSBRT with a median of 2 lesions per patient (range: 1–5). The median planning target volume (PTV)-encompassing dose for SFRS was 24 Gy (range: 17-26) compared to 45 Gy (range: 20-60) in 2-12 fractions in fSBRT. The median follow-up time was 21 months (range: 3-68). LC rates at 1 and 2 years for SFSR vs. fSBRT were 89% and 83% vs. 75% and 59%, respectively (p=0.026). LM treated with SFSR were significantly smaller (p=0.001). The 1 and 2-year OS rates for all patients were 84% and 71%, respectively. In univariate analysis treatment with SFRS, an interval of ≥ 12 months between diagnosis of LM and treatment, non-colorectal cancer histology and BED <100 Gy were significantly associated with better LC. However, none of these parameters remained significant in the multivariate Cox regression model. OS was significantly better in patients with negative lymph nodes (N0), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70% and time to first metastasis ≥12 months. There was no grade 3 acute or late toxicity. Conclusions: We observed good LC and low toxicity rates after SFRS for small lung metastases. Longer time to first metastasis, good KPS and N0 predicted better OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document