scholarly journals Clinical Interpretation of Quantitative Sensory Testing as a Measure of Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda M. Brandow ◽  
Julie A. Panepinto
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Ramsay ◽  
Damian Francis ◽  
Rachel Bartlett ◽  
Georgiana Gordon-Strachan ◽  
Justin Grant ◽  
...  

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a psychophysical test of sensory function which may assist in assessing neuropathic pain (NP). This study compares QST findings with a standardized NP questionnaire to assess their agreement among Jamaicans with sickle cell disease (SCD). A cross sectional study consecutively recruited SCD patients 14 years and older, not pregnant, and without history of clinical stroke or acute illness in Kingston, Jamaica. QST identified thresholds for cold detection, heat detection, heat pain and pressure pain at the dominant thenar eminence, opposite dorsolateral foot and the subject's most frequent pain site. The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) was interviewer-administered to diagnose NP. Subjects were divided into low and high sensitization groups if below the 5th and above the 95th percentiles, respectively on QST measures. Kappa agreement coefficients, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to compare QST with the DN4. Two hundred and fifty-seven SCD subjects were recruited (mean age 31.7±12.2 years, 55.7% female, 75% SS genotype). Kappa agreements were fair (0.2-0.4) to good (0.6-0.8) between DN4 individual items of itching, hypoesthesia to touch, hypoesthesia to pinprick and brush allodynia with various QST sensitization groups. However, kappa agreements between the NP overall diagnosis on the DN4 with sensitization groups were poor (<0.2). Only heat detection (0.75) and heat pain (0.75) at the leg as a pain site showed satisfactory area under the curve (>0.7). QST may assist in assessing individual components of NP but its use should be limited as a tool to augment clinical assessments.


Pain Practice ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam O. Ezenwa ◽  
Robert E. Molokie ◽  
Zaijie Jim Wang ◽  
Yingwei Yao ◽  
Marie L. Suarez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (5) ◽  
pp. 925-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin E. Miller ◽  
Dawn S. Brown ◽  
Scott W. Keith ◽  
Sarah E. Hegarty ◽  
Yamaja Setty ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1007-1007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen E. Meiler ◽  
Leigh G Wells ◽  
Latanya Bowman ◽  
Pritam Bora ◽  
Hongyan Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1007 Pain is a common and serious complication of sickle cell disease (SCD), which is frequently disabling and difficult to treat. Acute painful crises account for the vast majority of healthcare encounters (> 90% of hospitalizations), and many patients with SCD suffer from chronic pain. Despite several well designed clinical studies, which have brought to light the high incidence and severity of pain in this patient population, sickle cell pain remains an understudied, undermanaged, and poorly understood condition. Previous work has largely relied on self-reporting instruments, such as carefully designed pain diaries to study the epidemiology of pain in this patient cohort. In contrast, very little is known about the usefulness of methods that measure pain in response to a standardized stimulus and the correlation of experimentally induced pain to more traditional instruments such as pain diaries and opioid use. In this study we explored the use of pressure algometry to measure pain thresholds in adult patients with SCD. Our study enrolled 167 adult patients with SCD [163 SS, 1 SD Los Angeles, 3 Sβ0-thal; 108 on Hydroxyurea (HU), 59 off HU; 83 females and 84 males; mean age 31 years (range 16–61)] and forty racially matched controls (23 females and 17 males; mean age 35 years (range 17–61). The pain threshold, defined as the lowest pressure at which pain is induced, was measured by pressure algometry in three anatomic muscle groups (masseter, trapezius, and ulnar). Four measurements were obtained at each site and averaged for analysis. 118 patients were tested with a manual algometer (Wagner FDIX™, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT) and 49 patients with a computerized model (Algomed, Medoc Ltd., Israel). The data sets for the two algometer groups were highly correlated for each anatomic site and were therefore combined for the final analysis (Pearson's correlation coefficients: masseter readings, r=0.78, p=2.73E-09; trapezius readings, r=0.85, p=4.28E-12; ulnar readings, r=0.68, p=3.26E-06). In addition, self-reported pain and distress were monitored prospectively for six months using a validated pain diary (ordinal scales of 0–9, respectively; J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 February; 97(2): 183–193). Opioid use, expressed as morphine equivalents, and the frequency of vaso-occlusive events are being recorded prospectively for twelve months. Algometer readings were compared using a linear model with age and gender as covariates. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. A p-value of < 0.05 is significant. Adult patients with SCD experienced pain at significantly lower pressures at all anatomic sites tested compared to racially matched controls. Pain threshold measurements in the ulnar muscle group achieved the best discrimination between sickle cell and control subjects. (Patients vs. controls (KPa): Masseter: 150± 4.35 vs. 193± 13.24, p= 1.99E–05; trapezius: 265±10.23 vs. 383± 37.99, p= 2.78E–05; ulnar: 371±10.26 vs. 518±34.59, p= 6.28E–09). Ulnar algometer readings also correlated with self-reported pain scores (r=-0.226, p=0.0097). There was no correlation between pain threshold measurements and self-reported distress or the use of hydroxyurea. Quantitative sensory testing revealed that adult patients with SCD are hyperalgesic in response to a standardized pressure stimulus. Of the three anatomic sites tested, ulnar pain threshold readings produced the strongest separation between sickle cell and control subjects and correlated with self-reported pain. Quantitative sensory testing may provide a useful research and clinical tool to study the biological mechanisms of pain in SCD and the therapeutic efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological interventions. Disclosures: Fillingim: Algynomics: Consultancy, Shareholder Other.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3519-3519
Author(s):  
Nitya Bakshi ◽  
Ines Lukombo ◽  
Inna Belfer ◽  
Lakshmanan Krishnamurti

Abstract Title: Feasibility and Tolerability of Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease at the End of a Vasocclusive Episode Background: Children with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) have increased sensitivity to heat and cold pain (Brandow et al) during steady state. It is unknown if sensitivity to pain varies with a Vaso-Occlusive Episode (VOE).Characterization of pain sensitivity during acute VOE is essential to the understanding of the transition to chronic pain. While the administration of pain stimuli associated with QST during a VOE is obviously untenable, it is unknown if patients will tolerate QST procedures at the end of a VOE. Aim: To determine feasibility and tolerability of QST procedures at the end of VOE. Methods: Patients with SCD were offered quantitative sensory testing (QST) at steady state (at least 2 weeks following a VOE) and prior to or following discharge from the hospital for a VOE-related admission. Patients were contacted during hospitalization for VOE and timing of QST was determined by patient preference and taking into account readiness for discharge from the hospital. QST procedures included estimation of pressure, mechanical and thermal pain thresholds and tolerance (excluding cold tolerance) as well as windup values. At each time point, participants completed the PROMIS measures of pain intensity, pain interference, anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep, fatigue and peer relationships. Participants also completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale ((PCS)-Sullivan et al), Child Somatization Inventory (Walker et al), Pain Coping Inventory (Varni et al)* as well as Peds QL Generic and SCD specific measures of Quality of life*. After the QST procedures, participants completed the Gracely box scales (0-20 scale rating pain unpleasantness/intensity). Results: Ten patients who had an episode of VOE during the study period underwent QST at a median of 3.8 days after admission. The median age of participants who underwent testing was 16.5 years (IQR 11-20). 6 of 10 patients were female. Sixteen patients in VOE were offered QST testing. Eight of 12 patients who had undergone QST testing at steady state and 2 of 4 patients who had not previously undergone QST testing consented to QST testing. Nine patients completed testing at both steady state and following a VOE. Thermal testing was well tolerated by all participants (n=1 not offered due to equipment unavailability). Mechanical pain testing/windup was partially omitted (n=1) by patient request. The median Gracely Box Scale (0-20) score following QST was 0.5 (IQR 0-4, range 0-6) for pain unpleasantness and was 0 (IQR 0-6, range 0-8) for pain intensity. Conclusions: Quantitative Sensory Testing is well accepted, feasible and well tolerated in patients with SCD at the end of a Vasoocclusive Episode. Acknowledgments: 1- ASH Clinical Research Training Institute 2- Sickle Cell Disease Association of America 3- *PedsQL™ contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. E-mail: [email protected] – Internet: www.Mapi-trust.org and http://www.pedsql.org/index.html Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1995 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Gil ◽  
George Phillips ◽  
Deborah A. Webster ◽  
Nancy J. Martin ◽  
Mary Abrams ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. S33
Author(s):  
S. Bediako ◽  
V. Mathur ◽  
J. Haythornthwaite ◽  
C. Campbell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document