scholarly journals The Etiology of Genital Ulcer Disease and Coinfections With Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Zimbabwe

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
More Mungati ◽  
Anna Machiha ◽  
Owen Mugurungi ◽  
Mufuta Tshimanga ◽  
Peter H. Kilmarx ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 201 (12) ◽  
pp. 1811-1815 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Paz Bailey ◽  
M. Sternberg ◽  
D. A. Lewis ◽  
A. Puren

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARY C. DICKERSON ◽  
JEFF JOHNSTON ◽  
THOMAS E. DELEA ◽  
ALICE WHITE ◽  
ELIZABETH ANDREWS

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 753-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz F. Mroczkowski ◽  
David H. Martin

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 632-641
Author(s):  
Adi Agung Anantawijaya D ◽  
Muhammad Izazi Hari Purwoko ◽  
Mutia Devi ◽  
Suroso Adi Nugroho

Granuloma ingunale (GI) or donovanosis is a genital ulcer disease caused by theCalymmatobacterium granulomatis. It is a Gram-negative, facultative, obligateintracellular and pleomorphic bacterium. This bacterium has phylogeneticallyclosed to and placed within the Klebsiella genus. Clinically, the disease is com-monly characterized as painless, slowly progressive ulcerative lesions on thegenitals or perineum without regional lymphadenopathy. The lesions are highlyvascular and bleed easily on contact Extragenital lesions may occur but are rareand more common in newborns from mothers with GI genital lesions. Thisdisease is often neglected, therefore it is often misdiagnosed and inaccuratetherapy. Treatment time is 3 weeks or until clinical cure has been achieved forall proposed regimens. It often occurs both in men and women of reproductiveage (20-40 years). This article consists of several theoretical references that havebeen viewed to have a better understanding of GI.


2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-273
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Totten ◽  
Jane M. Kuypers ◽  
Cheng-Yen Chen ◽  
Michelle J. Alfa ◽  
Linda M. Parsons ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We used PCR assays to determine the etiology of genital ulcers in patients presenting to a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Dakar, Senegal, and evaluated the ability of two PCR tests ( groEL and recD ) and two serological tests (adsorption enzyme immunoassay [EIA] and lipooligosaccharide [LOS] EIA) to detect current Haemophilus ducreyi infection. We found that in this population, H. ducreyi , T. pallidum , and herpes simplex virus HSV DNA were detected in 56, 15, and 13% of 39 genital ulcer specimens, respectively, and H. ducreyi DNA was detected in 60% (3 of 5) of samples from ulcerated bubos. Among 40 consecutive patients with genital ulcer disease and with sufficient sample for both PCR assays, the recD and groEL H. ducreyi PCR assays were 83% concordant, with the recD PCR assay detecting six (15%) additional positive specimens and the groEL assay detecting one (3%) additional positive specimen. Compared to PCR, the adsorption EIA and LOS EIA tests had sensitivities of 71 and 59% and specificities of 57 and 90%, respectively, for the diagnosis of current H. ducreyi infection. While these differences in specificity could be due either to previous infection with H. ducreyi or to the detection of cross-reacting antibodies, only 6% of patients from a nearby family planning clinic gave a positive reaction in both the adsorption EIA and LOS EIA assays, indicating that cross-reacting antibodies are not prevalent among clinic attendees in this city. Our studies indicate that the adsorption EIA detects both current and past infection, while the LOS EIA assay is more specific for current infection with H. ducreyi in this population.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Brown ◽  
Carey Farquhar

AIDS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-182
Author(s):  
Lucia V. Torian ◽  
Isaac B. Weisfuse ◽  
Hadi A. Makki ◽  
Deborah A. Benson ◽  
Linda M. DiCamillo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document