The effect of care bundle development on surgical site infection after hemiarthroplasty

2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 1375-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Johnson ◽  
Ian Starks ◽  
Gordon Bancroft ◽  
Philip J. Roberts
Spine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Gema Vicente-Sánchez ◽  
Marcos Alonso-García ◽  
Ana Isabel Hijas-Gómez ◽  
Rafael González-Díaz ◽  
Javier Martínez-Martín ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E Edmiston ◽  
David Leaper

Showering preoperatively with chlorhexidine gluconate is an issue that continues to promote debate; however, many studies demonstrate evidence of surgical site infection risk reduction. Methodological issues have been present in many of the studies used to compile guidelines and there has been a lack of standardisation of processes for application of the active agents in papers pre-2009. This review and commentary paper highlights the potential for enhancing compliance with this low-risk and low-cost intervention and provides some guidance for enhancing implementation of preoperative showering with both chlorhexidine in solution and impregnated wipes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 542-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo UZUKA ◽  
Hideaki TAKAHASHI ◽  
Yoko NAKASU ◽  
Takeshi OKUDA ◽  
Koichi MITSUYA ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Swain ◽  
J Rogers ◽  
D Gane ◽  
M Quinn ◽  
J Hopkins ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is common after abdominal surgery. A care bundle was introduced to sustainably reduce SSI after elective colorectal surgery. This study aimed to implement an expanded care bundle after emergency laparotomy. Methods Quality improvement methodology was used. SSI was measured by direct assessment of the wound in patients in hospital at 30 days. For discharged patients, the PHE SSI surveillance questionnaire was used to measure patient-reported SSI 30 days post-operatively. The care bundle included: 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation; dual ring wound protectors; triclosan-coated sutures for wound closure; second dose of antibiotics >4 hours, betadine to the wound and glove change before closure. Bundle compliance was measured and fed back to surgical teams. Results Baseline SSI was 13.5% (178 patients) which reduced to 8.5% (118 patients) following bundle introduction. Response rate was 60%. Compliance with antibacterial sutures was measured for patients whose wounds were closed; 10% received negative pressure dressings. Mortality within 30 days was 9%. Length of stay reduced from mean 22.6 to 12.45, median 13.5 to 9 days. Conclusion The care bundle reduced SSI after emergency laparotomy. Measuring SSI is more difficult after emergency surgery due to higher death rate, longer length of stay and use of laparostomy. Other challenges include difficulty using wound protectors for some procedures e.g. adhesiolysis and changing practice from use of skin clips.


HPB ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S19
Author(s):  
L.S. Tufts ◽  
E.D. Jarnagin ◽  
J.R. Flynn ◽  
M. Gonen ◽  
J.G. Guillem ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 4524
Author(s):  
Jonas Jurt ◽  
Martin Hübner ◽  
Daniel Clerc ◽  
Pauline Curchod ◽  
Mohamed A. Abd El Aziz ◽  
...  

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of an intraoperative standardized surgical site infection (SSI) prevention bundle. Methods: The multimodal, evidence-based care bundle included nine intraoperative items (antibiotic type, timing, and re-dosing; disinfection; induction temperature control > 36.5°; glove change; intra-cavity lavage; wound protection; and closure strategy). The bundle was applied to all consecutive patients undergoing colonic resections. The primary outcome, SSI, was independently assessed by the National Infection Surveillance Committee for up to 30 postoperative days. A historical, institutional pre-implementation control group (2012–2017) with an identical methodology was used for comparison. Findings: In total, 1516 patients were included, of which 1256 (82.8%) were in the control group and 260 (17.2%) were in the post-implementation group. After 2:1 propensity score matching, the groups were similar for all items (p > 0.05). Overall compliance with the care bundle was 77% (IQR 77–88). The lowest compliance rates were observed for temperature control (53% overall), intra-cavity lavage (64% overall), and wound protection and closure (68% and 63% in the SSI group, respectively). Surgical site infections were reported in 58 patients (22.2%) vs. 21.4% in the control group (p = 0.79). Infection rates were comparable throughout the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) categories: superficial, 12 patients (4.5%) vs. 4.2%, p = 0.82; deep incisional, 10 patients (3.7%) vs. 5.1%, p = 0.34; organ space, 36 (14%) vs. 12.4%, p = 0.48. After propensity score matching, rates remained comparable throughout all comparisons (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: The implementation of an intraoperative standardized care bundle had no impact on SSI rates. This may be explained by insufficient compliance with the individual measures.


Author(s):  
Leire Zarain-Obrador ◽  
Marcos Alonso-García ◽  
Pablo Gil-Yonte ◽  
Ana I. Hijas-Gómez ◽  
Diego Rodríguez-Villar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document