Comparison Study of Branch Versus Main Trunk Repetitive Nerve Stimulation of Facial Nerve in Normal Subjects

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guha K. Venkatraman ◽  
Rut Dholakia ◽  
Arjuna Mannam ◽  
Yedatore S. Venkatesh
1989 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian M. Windmill ◽  
Serge A. Martinez ◽  
Christopher B. Shields ◽  
Markku Paloheimo

Facial nerve stimulation by electrical current is painful and tends to discourage serial studies. Transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve is painless, easily reproducible, and elicits facial muscle responses identical to electrical stimulation.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yojiro Seki ◽  
Larry Krain ◽  
Thoru Yamada ◽  
Jun Kimura

Abstract We compared transcranial magnetic and conventional electrical stimulation in 20 facial nerves of 10 normal subjects. A magnetic coil was placed tangentially over T5 or T6 (10-20 electroencephalogram electrode placement system) and electrical stimulation was applied 1 cm below the anterior tragus. Compound muscle action potentials recorded from the ipsilateral nasalis muscle showed onset latencies (mean ± SD) of 4.48 ± 0.50 ms with magnetic stimulation and 3.15 ± 0.40 ms with electrical stimulation, a mean difference of 1.33 ± 0.14 ms. Stimulation of the extracranial facial nerve at two sites yielded a conduction velocity of 59.6 ± 4.5 m/s. Based on these findings, the magnetically stimulated site was estimated to fall 79.0 ± 8.6 mm proximal to the point of electrical stimulation. Taking the average length of the nerve trunk and histological specificity of the root exit zone into consideration, evidence indicates that the root exit zone of the facial nerve is the most likely initiating site of excitation with magnetic stimulation.


1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 950-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Uchino ◽  
H. Ikegami ◽  
M. Sasaki ◽  
K. Endo ◽  
M. Imagawa ◽  
...  

1. Connections from the utricular (UT) nerve to motoneurons and interneurons in the ipsilateral abducens (AB) nucleus were studied in anesthetized and decerebrated cats. Bipolar electrodes were fixed on the left UT nerve under visual observation. The other branches of the vestibular nerve and the facial nerve were transected in the left inner ear. 2. Stimulation of the UT nerve evoked a small positive-negative (P/N) deflection and a negative (N1) potential in the vestibular nuclei, with mean latencies of 0.56 and 0.84 ms, respectively. In the AB nucleus a small P/N deflection with a mean latency of 0.72 ms was recorded, which was considered as a incoming volley of the UT nerve. 3. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were recorded from AB motoneurons with short latencies after UT nerve stimulation. They were classified into two types, M and D. M-type EPSPs, which followed repetitive high-frequency stimuli and were recorded from the majority of AB motoneurons, had latencies ranging from 0.9 to 1.2 ms. Double shocks to the UT nerve evoked EPSPs that had the same latency. It was suggested that the AB motoneurons had monosynaptic connections with the UT nerve. D-type EPSPs, which were recorded from most of the AB motoneurons, had slightly longer latencies ranging from 1.2 to 1.8 ms. They showed temporal facilitation when double shocks were provided to the UT nerve. They did not follow repetitive high-frequency stimuli (< or = 2.5-ms interval). It was suggested that D-type EPSPs were di-synaptically evoked via secondary vestibular neurons. Interneurons in the AB nucleus had the same characteristics as AB motoneurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin J. Oh ◽  
Yuki Hatanaka ◽  
Shoji Hemmi ◽  
Angela M. Young ◽  
Mia L. Scheufele ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document