General discussion

1996 ◽  
Vol 351 (1346) ◽  
pp. 1481-1482 ◽  

L. Weiskrantz ( Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, U. K.). I have tried to link what we have heard from experimental studies in humans with what we have heard from experimental studies in monkeys concerning functions of the prefrontal cortex. The obvious difference is that in my experience, patients with posterior cortical lesions are often those with shortterm memory deficits (such as patient KF), whereas you have to work very hard with frontal lobe lesioned patients to see profound impairments of that kind. This provides an obvious contrast with experimental studies in monkeys which suggest a role for the prefrontal cortex in just such simple short-term or working memory processes. I was wondering if any of the speakers would care to comment on this rather obvious distinction between human and monkey work that has been presented so far?

2016 ◽  
Vol 301 ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipe C. Matheus ◽  
Daniel Rial ◽  
Joana I. Real ◽  
Cristina Lemos ◽  
Juliana Ben ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  

Time estimation, within a range of seconds, involves cognitive functions which depend on multiple brain regions. Here we report on studies investigating the reproduction and production of three durations (5, 14, and 38 seconds) in four groups of patients. The amnesic patient underproduced the length of the long durations because of episodic memory deficit following bilateral medial temporal lesions. Epileptic patients (n = 9) with right medial temporal lobe resections underproduced the three durations because of a distorted representation of time in long-term memory. Traumatic brain injury patients (n = 15) made more variable duration productions and reproductions because of working memory deficits following frontal-lobe dysfunction. Patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 18) overproduced the short duration and underproduced the long duration because of a possible increase in internal clock speed following levodopa treatment, as well as working memory deficits associated with frontal-lobe damage. Further research, in neurological and psychiatric patients, is required to better understand the underlying mechanisms of time estimation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 029-039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Salis ◽  
Faustina Hwang ◽  
David Howard ◽  
Nicole Lallini

AbstractAlthough the roles of verbal short-term and working memory on spoken sentence comprehension skills in persons with aphasia have been debated for many years, the development of treatments to mitigate verbal short-term and working memory deficits as a way of improving spoken sentence comprehension is a new avenue in treatment research. In this article, we review and critically appraise this emerging evidence base. We also present new data from five persons with aphasia of a replication of a previously reported treatment that had resulted in some improvement of spoken sentence comprehension in a person with aphasia. The replicated treatment did not result in improvements in sentence comprehension. We forward recommendations for future research in this, admittedly weak at present, but important clinical research avenue that would help improve our understanding of the mechanisms of improvement of short-term and working memory training in relation to sentence comprehension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document