scholarly journals Accurate and reproducible prediction of ICU readmissions

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh-Phong Nguyen ◽  
Nicolas Paris ◽  
Adrien Parrot
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Scoring Methods ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Boosting Method ◽  
Mimic Iii ◽  
The Way

Readmission in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with poor clinical outcomes and high costs. Traditional scoring methods to help clinicians deciding whether a patient is ready for discharge have failed to meet expectations, paving the way for machine learning based approaches. Freely available datasets such as MIMIC-III have served as benchmarking media to compare such tools. We used the OMOP-CDM version of MIMIC-III (MIMIC-OMOP) to train and evaluate a lightweight tree boosting method to predict readmission in ICU at different time points after discharge (3, 7, 15 and 30 days), outperforming existing solutions with an AUROC of 0.802 (SD=0.011) and a recall of 0.837 (SD=0.016) for 3-days readmission.

scholarly journals Toward Optimal Heparin Dosing by Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Methods: Retrospective Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Chun Liu ◽  
Dongkai Li ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Fanglan Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Heparin Treatment ◽  
Neural Network Algorithm ◽  
Mimic Iii ◽  
Machine Learning Models

BACKGROUND Heparin is one of the most commonly used medications in intensive care units. In clinical practice, the use of a weight-based heparin dosing nomogram is standard practice for the treatment of thrombosis. Recently, machine learning techniques have dramatically improved the ability of computers to provide clinical decision support and have allowed for the possibility of computer generated, algorithm-based heparin dosing recommendations. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to predict the effects of heparin treatment using machine learning methods to optimize heparin dosing in intensive care units based on the predictions. Patient state predictions were based upon activated partial thromboplastin time in 3 different ranges: subtherapeutic, normal therapeutic, and supratherapeutic, respectively. METHODS Retrospective data from 2 intensive care unit research databases (Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III, MIMIC-III; e–Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database, eICU) were used for the analysis. Candidate machine learning models (random forest, support vector machine, adaptive boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and shallow neural network) were compared in 3 patient groups to evaluate the classification performance for predicting the subtherapeutic, normal therapeutic, and supratherapeutic patient states. The model results were evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. RESULTS Data from the MIMIC-III database (n=2789 patients) and from the eICU database (n=575 patients) were used. In 3-class classification, the shallow neural network algorithm performed the best (F1 scores of 87.26%, 85.98%, and 87.55% for data set 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The shallow neural network algorithm achieved the highest F1 scores within the patient therapeutic state groups: subtherapeutic (data set 1: 79.35%; data set 2: 83.67%; data set 3: 83.33%), normal therapeutic (data set 1: 93.15%; data set 2: 87.76%; data set 3: 84.62%), and supratherapeutic (data set 1: 88.00%; data set 2: 86.54%; data set 3: 95.45%) therapeutic ranges, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The most appropriate model for predicting the effects of heparin treatment was found by comparing multiple machine learning models and can be used to further guide optimal heparin dosing. Using multicenter intensive care unit data, our study demonstrates the feasibility of predicting the outcomes of heparin treatment using data-driven methods, and thus, how machine learning–based models can be used to optimize and personalize heparin dosing to improve patient safety. Manual analysis and validation suggested that the model outperformed standard practice heparin treatment dosing.

scholarly journals Five novel clinical phenotypes for critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation in intensive care units: a retrospective and multi database study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Zhongheng Zhang ◽  
Fanglan Zheng ◽  
Pan Pan ◽  
Na Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
The Other ◽  
Clinical Phenotypes ◽  
Mimic Iii

Abstract Background Although protective mechanical ventilation (MV) has been used in a variety of applications, lung injury may occur in both patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study is to use machine learning to identify clinical phenotypes for critically ill patients with MV in intensive care units (ICUs). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 5013 patients who had undergone MV and treatment in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Statistical and machine learning methods were used. All the data used in this study, including demographics, vital signs, circulation parameters and mechanical ventilator parameters, etc., were automatically extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) system. An external database, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC III), was used for validation. Results Phenotypes were derived from a total of 4009 patients who underwent MV using a latent profile analysis of 22 variables. The associations between the phenotypes and disease severity and clinical outcomes were assessed. Another 1004 patients in the database were enrolled for validation. Of the five derived phenotypes, phenotype I was the most common subgroup (n = 2174; 54.2%) and was mostly composed of the postoperative population. Phenotype II (n = 480; 12.0%) led to the most severe conditions. Phenotype III (n = 241; 6.01%) was associated with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low mean airway pressure. Phenotype IV (n = 368; 9.18%) was associated with high driving pressure, and younger patients comprised a large proportion of the phenotype V group (n = 746; 18.6%). In addition, we found that the mortality rate of Phenotype IV was significantly higher than that of the other phenotypes. In this subgroup, the number of patients in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score segment (9,22] was 198, the number of deaths was 88, and the mortality rate was higher than 44%. However, the cumulative 28-day mortality of Phenotypes IV and II, which were 101 of 368 (27.4%) and 87 of 480 (18.1%) unique patients, respectively, was significantly higher than those of the other phenotypes. There were consistent phenotype distributions and differences in biomarker patterns by phenotype in the validation cohort, and external verification with MIMIC III further generated supportive results. Conclusions Five clinical phenotypes were correlated with different disease severities and clinical outcomes, which suggested that these phenotypes may help in understanding heterogeneity in MV treatment effects.

scholarly journals Toward Optimal Heparin Dosing by Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Methods: Retrospective Study

10.2196/17648 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e17648
Author(s):  
Longxiang Su ◽  
Chun Liu ◽  
Dongkai Li ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Fanglan Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Heparin Treatment ◽  
Neural Network Algorithm ◽  
Mimic Iii ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Background Heparin is one of the most commonly used medications in intensive care units. In clinical practice, the use of a weight-based heparin dosing nomogram is standard practice for the treatment of thrombosis. Recently, machine learning techniques have dramatically improved the ability of computers to provide clinical decision support and have allowed for the possibility of computer generated, algorithm-based heparin dosing recommendations. Objective The objective of this study was to predict the effects of heparin treatment using machine learning methods to optimize heparin dosing in intensive care units based on the predictions. Patient state predictions were based upon activated partial thromboplastin time in 3 different ranges: subtherapeutic, normal therapeutic, and supratherapeutic, respectively. Methods Retrospective data from 2 intensive care unit research databases (Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III, MIMIC-III; e–Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database, eICU) were used for the analysis. Candidate machine learning models (random forest, support vector machine, adaptive boosting, extreme gradient boosting, and shallow neural network) were compared in 3 patient groups to evaluate the classification performance for predicting the subtherapeutic, normal therapeutic, and supratherapeutic patient states. The model results were evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. Results Data from the MIMIC-III database (n=2789 patients) and from the eICU database (n=575 patients) were used. In 3-class classification, the shallow neural network algorithm performed the best (F1 scores of 87.26%, 85.98%, and 87.55% for data set 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The shallow neural network algorithm achieved the highest F1 scores within the patient therapeutic state groups: subtherapeutic (data set 1: 79.35%; data set 2: 83.67%; data set 3: 83.33%), normal therapeutic (data set 1: 93.15%; data set 2: 87.76%; data set 3: 84.62%), and supratherapeutic (data set 1: 88.00%; data set 2: 86.54%; data set 3: 95.45%) therapeutic ranges, respectively. Conclusions The most appropriate model for predicting the effects of heparin treatment was found by comparing multiple machine learning models and can be used to further guide optimal heparin dosing. Using multicenter intensive care unit data, our study demonstrates the feasibility of predicting the outcomes of heparin treatment using data-driven methods, and thus, how machine learning–based models can be used to optimize and personalize heparin dosing to improve patient safety. Manual analysis and validation suggested that the model outperformed standard practice heparin treatment dosing.

scholarly journals Diuretic strategies in patients with resistance to loop-diuretics in the intensive care unit: A retrospective study from the MIMIC-III database

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 282-291
Author(s):  
Jean-Maxime Côté ◽  
Josée Bouchard ◽  
Patrick T. Murray ◽  
William Beaubien-Souligny
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Loop Diuretics ◽  
Mimic Iii

scholarly journals Development of a machine learning model for predicting pediatric mortality in the early stages of intensive care unit admission

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bongjin Lee ◽  
Kyunghoon Kim ◽  
Hyejin Hwang ◽  
You Sun Kim ◽  
Eun Hee Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
Machine Learning Model

AbstractThe aim of this study was to develop a predictive model of pediatric mortality in the early stages of intensive care unit (ICU) admission using machine learning. Patients less than 18 years old who were admitted to ICUs at four tertiary referral hospitals were enrolled. Three hospitals were designated as the derivation cohort for machine learning model development and internal validation, and the other hospital was designated as the validation cohort for external validation. We developed a random forest (RF) model that predicts pediatric mortality within 72 h of ICU admission, evaluated its performance, and compared it with the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of RF model was 0.942 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.912–0.972) in the derivation cohort and 0.906 (95% CI = 0.900–0.912) in the validation cohort. In contrast, the AUROC of PIM 3 was 0.892 (95% CI = 0.878–0.906) in the derivation cohort and 0.845 (95% CI = 0.817–0.873) in the validation cohort. The RF model in our study showed improved predictive performance in terms of both internal and external validation and was superior even when compared to PIM 3.

scholarly journals 61. Using Machine Learning for Prediction of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Adult Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S162-S163
Author(s):  
Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava ◽  
Daniela Patricia Trelles-Garcia ◽  
Maria Adriana Yanez-Bello ◽  
Chul Won Chung ◽  
Sana Chaudry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Decision Rules ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Prediction Rules ◽  
Testing Model ◽  
Measures Of Performance

Abstract Background As the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic develops, there is a need for prediction rules to guide clinical decisions. Previous reports have identified risk factors using statistical inference model. The primary goal of these models is to characterize the relationship between variables and outcomes, not to make predictions. In contrast, the primary purpose of machine learning is obtaining a model that can make repeatable predictions. The objective of this study is to develop decision rules tailored to our patient population to predict ICU admissions and death in patients with COVID-19. Methods We used a de-identified dataset of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 admitted to our community hospital between March 2020 and June 2020. We used a Random Forest algorithm to build the prediction models for ICU admissions and death. Random Forest is one of the most powerful machine learning algorithms; it leverages the power of multiple decision trees, randomly created, for making decisions. Results 313 patients were included; 237 patients were used to train each model, 26 were used for testing, and 50 for validation. A total of 16 variables, selected according to their availability in the Emergency Department, were fit into the models. For the survival model, the combination of age >57 years, the presence of altered mental status, procalcitonin ≥3.0 ng/mL, a respiratory rate >22, and a blood urea nitrogen >32 mg/dL resulted in a decision rule with an accuracy of 98.7% in the training model, 73.1% in the testing model, and 70% in the validation model (Table 1, Figure 1). For the ICU admission model, the combination of age < 82 years, a systolic blood pressure of ≤94 mm Hg, oxygen saturation of ≤93%, a lactate dehydrogenase >591 IU/L, and a lactic acid >1.5 mmol/L resulted in a decision rule with an accuracy of 99.6% in the training model, 80.8% in the testing model, and 82% in the validation model (Table 2, Figure 2). Table 1. Measures of Performance in Predicting Inpatient Mortality Conclusion We created decision rules using machine learning to predict ICU admission or death in patients with COVID-19. Although there are variables previously described with statistical inference, these decision rules are customized to our patient population; furthermore, we can continue to train the models fitting more data with new patients to create even more accurate prediction rules. Figure 1. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for Inpatient Mortality Table 2. Measures of Performance in Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission Figure 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve for Intensive Care Unit Admission Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Predicting adult neuroscience intensive care unit admission from emergency department triage using a retrospective, tabular-free text machine learning approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Klang ◽  
Benjamin R. Kummer ◽  
Neha S. Dangayach ◽  
Amy Zhong ◽  
M. Arash Kia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Combined Model ◽  
Text Data ◽  
Machine Learning Model ◽  
Record Data

AbstractEarly admission to the neurosciences intensive care unit (NSICU) is associated with improved patient outcomes. Natural language processing offers new possibilities for mining free text in electronic health record data. We sought to develop a machine learning model using both tabular and free text data to identify patients requiring NSICU admission shortly after arrival to the emergency department (ED). We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients at the Mount Sinai Hospital, an academic medical center in New York City. All patients presenting to our institutional ED between January 2014 and December 2018 were included. Structured (tabular) demographic, clinical, bed movement record data, and free text data from triage notes were extracted from our institutional data warehouse. A machine learning model was trained to predict likelihood of NSICU admission at 30 min from arrival to the ED. We identified 412,858 patients presenting to the ED over the study period, of whom 1900 (0.5%) were admitted to the NSICU. The daily median number of ED presentations was 231 (IQR 200–256) and the median time from ED presentation to the decision for NSICU admission was 169 min (IQR 80–324). A model trained only with text data had an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–0.91). A structured data-only model had an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.91–0.94). A combined model trained on structured and text data had an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.92–0.95). At a false positive rate of 1:100 (99% specificity), the combined model was 58% sensitive for identifying NSICU admission. A machine learning model using structured and free text data can predict NSICU admission soon after ED arrival. This may potentially improve ED and NSICU resource allocation. Further studies should validate our findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document