scholarly journals Impaired Humoral Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and CLL Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Diefenbach ◽  
Jessica Caro ◽  
Akiko Koide ◽  
Michael Grossbard ◽  
Judith Goldberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Humoral Response ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Neutralization Capacity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Current Guidance ◽  
Anti Cd20

Patients with hematologic malignancies are a high priority for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, yet the benefit they will derive is uncertain. We investigated the humoral response to vaccination in 53 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), or CLL patients. Peripheral blood was obtained 2 weeks after first vaccination and 6 weeks after second vaccination for antibody profiling using the multiplex bead-binding assay. Serum IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody levels to the spike specific receptor binding domain (RBD) were evaluated as a measure of response. Subsequently, antibody-positive serum were assayed for neutralization capacity against authentic SARS-CoV-2. Histology was 68% lymphoma and 32% CLL; groups were: patients receiving anti- CD20-based therapy (45%), monitored with disease (28%), receiving BTK inhibitors (19%), or chemotherapy (all HL) (8%). SARS-CoV-2 specific RBD IgG antibody response was decreased across all NHL and CLL groups: 25%, 73%, and 40%, respectively. Antibody IgG titers were significantly reduced (p < 0.001) for CD20 treated and targeted therapy patients, and (p = 0.003) for monitored patients. In 94% of patients evaluated after first and second vaccination, antibody titers did not significantly boost after second vaccination. Only 13% of CD20 treated and 13% of monitored patients generated neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 with ICD50s 135 to 1767, and 445 and > 10240. This data has profound implications given the current guidance relaxing masking restrictions and for timing of vaccinations. Unless immunity is confirmed with laboratory testing, these patients should continue to mask, socially distance, and to avoid close contact with non-vaccinated individuals.

scholarly journals A re-examination of radioimmunotherapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: prospects for dual-targeted antibody/radioantibody therapy

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (17) ◽  
pp. 3891-3895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Sharkey ◽  
Oliver W. Press ◽  
David M. Goldenberg
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cd20 Antibody ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Antibody-based therapies, both unconjugated antibodies and radioimmunotherapy, have had a significant impact on the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Single-agent rituximab is an effective therapy, but it is being increasingly used with combination chemotherapy to improve the objective response and its duration. The approved anti-CD20 radioimmunoconjugates (90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan or 131I-tositumomab) have had encouraging results, with trials now seeking to incorporate a radioimmunoconjugate in various settings. However, new preclinical data raise important questions concerning current radioimmunoconjugate treatment regimens and ways to improve them. In radioconjugate therapy, nearly 900 mg of the unlabeled anti-CD20 IgG antibody is predosed to the patient before the anti-CD20 antibody conjugated to either 90Y or 131I is given. Combining an unconjugated anti-CD20 antibody therapy with a radioimmunoconjugate binding to a noncompeting antigen might improve responses by allowing optimal uptake of each agent. Preclinical models have indicated that careful consideration should be given to predosing when using competing antibodies, but that consolidation anti-CD20 therapy enhances the efficacy of radioimmunoconjugate therapy. New technologies, such as pretargeted radioimmunotherapy, also hold promise by reducing toxicity without sacrificing efficacy, and consideration should be given to fractionating or giving multiple radioimmunoconjugate treatments. This perspective discusses how these issues could affect current and future clinical trials.

scholarly journals Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (16) ◽  
pp. 3053-3061
Author(s):  
C. Perry ◽  
E. Luttwak ◽  
R. Balaban ◽  
G. Shefer ◽  
M. M. Morales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Vaccine Dose ◽  
Humoral Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Serological Response ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Patients diagnosed with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), particularly if recently treated with anti-CD20 antibodies, are at risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Because studies evaluating humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine in these patients are lacking, recommendations regarding vaccination strategy remain unclear. The humoral immune response to BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in patients with B-NHL who received 2 vaccine doses 21 days apart and compared with the response in healthy controls. Antibody titer, measured by the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2S assay, was evaluated 2 to 3 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients with B-NHL (n = 149), aggressive B-NHL (a-B-NHL; 47%), or indolent B-NHL (i-B-NHL; 53%) were evaluated. Twenty-eight (19%) were treatment naïve, 37% were actively treated with a rituximab/obinutuzumab (R/Obi)–based induction regimen or R/Obi maintenance, and 44% had last been treated with R/Obi &gt;6 months before vaccination. A seropositive response was achieved in 89%, 7.3%, and 66.7%, respectively, with response rates of 49% in patients with B-NHL vs 98.5% in 65 healthy controls (P &lt; .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer time since exposure to R/Obi and absolute lymphocyte count ≥0.9 × 103/μL predicted a positive serological response. Median time to achieve positive serology among anti-CD20 antibody-treated patients was longer in i-B-NHL vs a-B-NHL. The humoral response to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is impaired in patients with B-NHL who are undergoing R/Obi treatment. Longer time since exposure to R/Obi is associated with improved response rates to the COVID-19 vaccine. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04746092.

Thrombotic complications in adult patients with lymphoma: a meta-analysis of 29 independent cohorts including 18 018 patients and 1149 events

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (26) ◽  
pp. 5322-5328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanesa Caruso ◽  
Augusto Di Castelnuovo ◽  
Susana Meschengieser ◽  
Maria A. Lazzari ◽  
Giovanni de Gaetano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Thrombotic Complications ◽  
Exact Maximum Likelihood

AbstractThrombotic complications in hematologic malignancies have important clinical implications. In this meta-analysis we sought to obtain accurate estimates of the thrombotic risk in lymphoma patients. Articles were searched in electronic databases and references. Eighteen articles were identified (29 cohorts, 18 018 patients and 1149 events). Pooled incidence rates (IRs) were calculated by the use of a method based on the exact maximum likelihood binomial distribution. The global IR of thrombosis was 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0%-6.8%). The global IRs of venous or arterial events were 5.3% (95% CI, 5.0%-5.7%) and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.2%), respectively. The IR of thrombosis observed in subjects with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was 6.5% (95% CI, 6.1%-6.9%), significantly greater than that observed for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (4.7%; 95% CI, 3.9%-5.6%). Within NHL, patients with high-grade disease had a greater risk of events (IR 8.3%; 95% CI, 7.0%-9.9%) than low-grade disease (IR 6.3%; 95% CI, 4.5%-8.9%). This meta-analysis shows that the IR of thrombosis in lymphoma patients is quite high, especially in those with NHL at an advanced stage of the disease. These results may help better defining lymphoma populations at high thrombotic risk, to whom prophylactic approaches could be preferentially applied.

scholarly journals Phase 1/2a study of 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (17) ◽  
pp. 4091-4101
Author(s):  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Tim Illidge ◽  
Nils Bolstad ◽  
Signe Spetalen ◽  
Ulf Madsbu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract For patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who fail initial anti-CD20–based immunochemotherapy or develop relapsed or refractory disease, there remains a significant unmet clinical need for new therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes and quality of life. 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan is a next-generation single-dose CD37-directed radioimmunotherapy (RIT) which was investigated in a phase 1/2a study in 74 patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, including 57 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). To improve targeting of 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan to tumor tissue and decrease hematologic toxicity, its administration was preceded by the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and the “cold” anti-CD37 antibody lilotomab. The most common adverse events (AEs) were reversible grade 3/4 neutropenia (31.6%) and thrombocytopenia (26.3%) with neutrophil and platelet count nadirs 5 to 7 weeks after RIT. The most frequent nonhematologic AE was grade 1/2 nausea (15.8%). With a single administration, the overall response rate was 61% (65% in patients with FL), including 30% complete responses. For FL with ≥2 prior therapies (n = 37), the overall response rate was 70%, including 32% complete responses. For patients with rituximab-refractory FL ≥2 prior therapies (n = 21), the overall response rate was 67%, and the complete response rate was 24%. The overall median duration of response was 13.6 months (32.0 months for patients with a complete response). 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan may provide a valuable alternative treatment approach in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly in patients with comorbidities unsuitable for more intensive approaches. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01796171.

scholarly journals Expression of the oncofetal ED-B–containing fibronectin isoform in hematologic tumors enables ED-B–targeted 131I-L19SIP radioimmunotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (10) ◽  
pp. 2265-2274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Sauer ◽  
Paola A. Erba ◽  
Mario Petrini ◽  
Andreas Menrad ◽  
Leonardo Giovannoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Promising Target

Abstract Current treatment of hematologic malignancies involves rather unspecific chemotherapy, frequently resulting in severe adverse events. Thus, modern clinical research focuses on compounds able to discriminate malignant from normal tissues. Being expressed in newly formed blood vessels of solid cancers but not in normal mature tissues, the extradomain B of fibronectin (ED-B FN) is a promising target for selective cancer therapies. Using immunohistology with a new epitope retrieval technique for paraffin-embedded tissues, ED-B FN expression was found in biopsies from more than 200 Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients of nearly all entities, and in patients with myeloproliferative diseases. ED-B FN expression was nearly absent in normal lymph nodes (n = 10) and bone marrow biopsies (n = 9). The extent of vascular ED-B FN expression in lymphoma tissues was positively correlated with grade of malignancy. ED-B FN expression was enhanced in lymph nodes with severe lymphadenopathy and in some hyperplastic tonsils. The in vivo accessibility of ED-B FN was confirmed in 3 lymphoma patients, in whom the lymphoma lesions were visualized on scintigraphy with 131I-labeled L19 small immunoprotein (131I-L19SIP). In 2 relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma patients131I-L19SIP radioimmunotherapy induced a sustained partial response, qualifying ED-B FN as a promising target for antibody-based lymphoma therapies.

Obinutuzumab (GA101) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Results From the Phase II GAUGUIN Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (23) ◽  
pp. 2920-2926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles A. Salles ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Philippe Solal-Céligny ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Thierry Lamy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Cd20

Purpose The phase II part of the phase I/II GAUGUIN study evaluated the efficacy and safety of two different doses of obinutuzumab (GA101), a type II, glycoengineered, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive eight cycles of obinutuzumab (GA101) as a flat dose of 400 mg on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 and also on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8 (400/400 mg) or 1,600 mg on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1 and 800 mg on day 1 of cycles 2 to 8 (1,600/800 mg). Results Forty patients were enrolled, including 34 with follicular lymphoma; 38 of 40 patients had previously received rituximab and 22 of 40 were rituximab refractory. The overall response rate at the end of treatment was 55% (95% CI, 32% to 76%) in the 1,600/800-mg group (9% complete responders) and 17% (95% CI, 4% to 41%) in the 400/400-mg group (no complete responders). Five of 10 rituximab-refractory patients had an end-of-treatment response in the 1,600/800-mg group versus one of 12 in the 400/400-mg group. Median progression-free survival was 11.9 months in the 1,600/800-mg group (range, 1.8 to 33.9+ months) and 6.0 months in the 400/400-mg group (range, 1.0 to 33.9+ months). The most common adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs) seen in 73% of patients, but only two patients had grade 3 to 4 IRRs (both in the 1,600/800-mg group). No IRRs were considered serious, and no patients withdrew for IRRs. Conclusion The 1,600/800-mg dose schedule of obinutuzumab (GA101) has encouraging activity with an acceptable safety profile in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

scholarly journals CD20 antibodies: type II to tango?

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (22) ◽  
pp. 5061-5063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marinus H. J. van Oers
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Intense Research ◽  
Cd20 Antibodies

Although the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), still many patients relapse and an increasing number become refractory to rituximab-containing therapy. This has initiated intense research to develop more potent anti-CD20 antibodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document