Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 variant Omicron to antibody neutralization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Planas ◽  
Nell Saunders ◽  
Piet Maes ◽  
Florence Guivel Benhassine ◽  
Cyril Planchais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Viral Fitness ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Antibody Neutralization ◽  
Neutralizing Activity ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant was first identified in November 2021 in Botswana and South Africa. It has in the meantime spread to many countries and is expected to rapidly become dominant worldwide. The lineage is characterized by the presence of about 32 mutations in the Spike, located mostly in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the receptor binding domain (RBD), which may enhance viral fitness and allow antibody evasion. Here, we isolated an infectious Omicron virus in Belgium, from a traveller returning from Egypt. We examined its sensitivity to 9 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) clinically approved or in development, and to antibodies present in 90 sera from COVID-19 vaccine recipients or convalescent individuals. Omicron was totally or partially resistant to neutralization by all mAbs tested. Sera from Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccine recipients, sampled 5 months after complete vaccination, barely inhibited Omicron. Sera from COVID-19 convalescent patients collected 6 or 12 months post symptoms displayed low or no neutralizing activity against Omicron. Administration of a booster Pfizer dose as well as vaccination of previously infected individuals generated an anti-Omicron neutralizing response, with titers 5 to 31 fold lower against Omicron than against Delta. Thus, Omicron escapes most therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and to a large extent vaccine-elicited antibodies.

scholarly journals An infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron virus escapes neutralization by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura VanBlargan ◽  
John Errico ◽  
Peter Halfmann ◽  
Seth Zost ◽  
James Crowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Clinical Use ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Neutralizing Activity ◽  
Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

Abstract The emergence of the highly-transmissible B.1.1.529 Omicron variant of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is concerning for antibody countermeasure efficacy because of the number of mutations in the spike protein. Here, we tested a panel of anti-receptor binding domain monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) corresponding to those in clinical use by Vir Biotechnology (S309, the parent mAb of VIR-7831 [Sotrovimab]), AstraZeneca (COV2-2196 and COV2-2130, the parent mAbs of AZD8895 and AZD1061), Regeneron (REGN10933 and REGN10987), Lilly (LY-CoV555 and LY-CoV016), and Celltrion (CT-P59) for their ability to neutralize an infectious B.1.1.529 Omicron isolate. Several mAbs (LY-CoV555, LY-CoV016, REGN10933, REGN10987, and CT-P59) completely lost neutralizing activity against B.1.1.529 virus in both Vero-TMPRSS2 and Vero-hACE2-TMPRSS2 cells, whereas others were reduced (COV2-2196 and COV2-2130 combination, ~12-fold decrease) or minimally affected (S309). Our results suggest that several, but not all, of the antibodies in clinical use may lose efficacy against the B.1.1.529 Omicron variant.

scholarly journals A Recombinant Protein SARS-CoV-2 Candidate Vaccine Elicits High-titer Neutralizing Antibodies in Macaques.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Baisa ◽  
David Rancour ◽  
Keith Mansfield ◽  
Monika Burns ◽  
Lori Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Pseudotyped Virus ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Neutralizing Activity ◽  
Terminal Domain

Abstract BackgroundVaccines that generate robust and long-lived protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection are urgently required. MethodsWe assessed the potential of vaccine candidates based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike in cynomolgus macaques (M. fascicularis) by examining their ability to generate spike binding antibodies with neutralizing activity. Antigens were derived from two distinct regions of the spike S1 subunit, either the N-terminal domain or an extended C-terminal domain containing the receptor-binding domain and were fused to the human IgG1 Fc domain. Three groups of 2 animals each were immunized with either antigen, alone or in combination. The development of antibody responses was evaluated through 20 weeks post-immunization. ResultsA robust IgG response to the spike protein was detected as early as 2 weeks after immunization with either protein and maintained for over 20 weeks. Sera from animals immunized with antigens derived from the RBD were able to prevent binding of soluble spike proteins to the ACE2 receptor, shown by in vitro binding assays, while sera from animals immunized with the N-terminal domain alone lacked this activity. Crucially, sera from animals immunized with the extended receptor binding domain but not the N-terminal domain had potent neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped virus, with titers in excess of 10,000, greatly exceeding that typically found in convalescent humans. Neutralizing activity persisted for more than 20 weeks. ConclusionsThese data support the utility of spike subunit-based antigens as a vaccine for use in humans.

scholarly journals Reduced sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2 to monoclonal antibodies and sera from convalescent and vaccinated individuals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delphine Planas ◽  
David Veyer ◽  
Artem Baidaliuk ◽  
Isabelle Staropoli ◽  
Florence Guivel-Benhassine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Immune Evasion ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
The Other ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Terminal Domain

The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 lineage emerged in October 2020 in India. It has since then become dominant in some indian regions and further spread to many countries. The lineage includes three main subtypes (B1.617.1, B.1617.2 and B.1.617.3), which harbour diverse Spike mutations in the N-terminal domain (NTD) and the receptor binding domain (RBD) which may increase their immune evasion potential. B.1.617.2 is believed to spread faster than the other versions. Here, we isolated infectious B.1.617.2 from a traveller returning from India. We examined its sensitivity to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and to antibodies present in sera from COVID-19 convalescent individuals or vaccine recipients, in comparison to other viral lineages. B.1.617.2 was resistant to neutralization by some anti-NTD and anti-RBD mAbs, including Bamlanivimab, which were impaired in binding to the B.1.617.2 Spike. Sera from convalescent patients collected up to 12 months post symptoms and from Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine recipients were 3 to 6 fold less potent against B.1.617.2, relative to B.1.1.7. Sera from individuals having received one dose of AstraZeneca Vaxzevria barely inhibited B.1.617.2. Thus, B.1.617.2 spread is associated with an escape to antibodies targeting non-RBD and RBD Spike epitopes.

scholarly journals A neutralizing human antibody binds to the N-terminal domain of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6504) ◽  
pp. 650-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyang Chi ◽  
Renhong Yan ◽  
Jun Zhang ◽  
Guanying Zhang ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Human Antibody ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Promising Target

Developing therapeutics against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could be guided by the distribution of epitopes, not only on the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the Spike (S) protein but also across the full Spike (S) protein. We isolated and characterized monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from 10 convalescent COVID-19 patients. Three mAbs showed neutralizing activities against authentic SARS-CoV-2. One mAb, named 4A8, exhibits high neutralization potency against both authentic and pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 but does not bind the RBD. We defined the epitope of 4A8 as the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the S protein by determining with cryo–eletron microscopy its structure in complex with the S protein to an overall resolution of 3.1 angstroms and local resolution of 3.3 angstroms for the 4A8-NTD interface. This points to the NTD as a promising target for therapeutic mAbs against COVID-19.

scholarly journals The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is poised to acquire complete resistance to wild-type spike vaccines

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yafei Liu ◽  
Noriko Arase ◽  
Jun-ichi Kishikawa ◽  
Mika Hirose ◽  
Songling Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Vaccine Development ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Effective Protection ◽  
Neutralizing Activity ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Complete Resistance

AbstractmRNA-based vaccines provide effective protection against most common SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, identifying likely breakthrough variants is critical for future vaccine development. Here, we found that the Delta variant completely escaped from anti-N-terminal domain (NTD) neutralizing antibodies, while increasing responsiveness to anti-NTD infectivity-enhancing antibodies. Although Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2-immune sera neutralized the Delta variant, when four common mutations were introduced into the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the Delta variant (Delta 4+), some BNT162b2-immune sera lost neutralizing activity and enhanced the infectivity. Unique mutations in the Delta NTD were involved in the enhanced infectivity by the BNT162b2-immune sera. Sera of mice immunized by Delta spike, but not wild-type spike, consistently neutralized the Delta 4+ variant without enhancing infectivity. Given the fact that a Delta variant with three similar RBD mutations has already emerged according to the GISAID database, it is necessary to develop vaccines that protect against such complete breakthrough variants.

scholarly journals The Impact on Infectivity and Neutralization Efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.351 Pseudovirus

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 633
Author(s):  
Yeong Jun Kim ◽  
Ui Soon Jang ◽  
Sandrine M. Soh ◽  
Joo-Youn Lee ◽  
Hye-Ra Lee
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Viral Spread ◽  
New Variant ◽  
Global Concern ◽  
The Impact

A new variant of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 lineage (first found in South Africa) has been raising global concern due to its harboring of multiple mutations in the spike that potentially increase transmissibility and yield resistance to neutralizing antibodies. We here tested infectivity and neutralization efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudoviruses bearing particular mutations of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) derived either from the Wuhan strains (referred to as D614G or with other sites) or the B.1.351 lineage (referred to as N501Y, K417N, and E484K). The three different pseudoviruses B.1.351 lineage related significantly increased infectivity compared with other mutants that indicated Wuhan strains. Interestingly, K417N and E484K mutations dramatically enhanced cell–cell fusion than N501Y even though their infectivity were similar, suggesting that K417N and E484K mutations harboring SARS-CoV-2 variant might be more transmissible than N501Y mutation containing SARS-CoV-2 variant. We also investigated the efficacy of two different monoclonal antibodies, Casirivimab and Imdevimab that neutralized SARS-CoV-2, against several kinds of pseudoviruses which indicated Wuhan or B.1.351 lineage. Remarkably, Imdevimab effectively neutralized B.1.351 lineage pseudoviruses containing N501Y, K417N, and E484K mutations, while Casirivimab partially affected them. Overall, our results underscore the importance of B.1.351 lineage SARS-CoV-2 in the viral spread and its implication for antibody efficacy.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) variants induce pathogenic patterns in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice distinct from early strains

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Radvak ◽  
Hyung-Joon Kwon ◽  
Martina Kosikova ◽  
Uriel Ortega-Rodriguez ◽  
Ruoxuan Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transgenic Mice ◽  
Receptor Binding ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Binding Domain ◽  
Antibody Neutralization ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Medical Interventions ◽  
Prior Infection ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
Hypoxia Signaling

AbstractSARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta) show increased transmissibility and enhanced antibody neutralization resistance. Here we demonstrate in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice that B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 are 100-fold more lethal than the original SARS-CoV-2 bearing 614D. B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 cause more severe organ lesions in K18-hACE2 mice than early SARS-CoV-2 strains bearing 614D or 614G, with B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 infection resulting in distinct tissue-specific cytokine signatures, significant D-dimer depositions in vital organs and less pulmonary hypoxia signaling before death. However, K18-hACE2 mice with prior infection of early SARS-CoV-2 strains or intramuscular immunization of viral spike or receptor binding domain are resistant to the lethal reinfection of B.1.1.7 or B.1.351, despite having reduced neutralization titers against these VOC than early strains. Our results thus distinguish pathogenic patterns in K18-hACE2 mice caused by B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 infection from those induced by early SARS-CoV-2 strains, and help inform potential medical interventions for combating COVID-19.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document