scholarly journals Assessment of a highly multiplexed RNA sequencing platform and comparison to existing high-throughput gene expression profiling techniques

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Reed ◽  
Elizabeth Moses ◽  
Xiaohui Xiao ◽  
Gang Liu ◽  
Joshua Campbell ◽  
...  

AbstractThe need to reduce per sample cost of RNA-seq profiling for scalable data generation has led to the emergence of highly multiplexed RNA-seq. These technologies utilize barcoding of cDNA sequences in order to combine samples into single sequencing lane to be separated during data processing. In this study, we report the performance of one such technique denoted as sparse full length sequencing (SFL), a ribosomal RNA depletion-based RNA sequencing approach that allows for the simultaneous sequencing of 96 samples and higher. We offer comparisons to well established single-sample techniques, including: full coverage Poly-A capture RNA-seq and microarray, as well as another low-cost highly multiplexed technique known as 3’ digital gene expression (3’DGE). Data was generated for a set of exposure experiments on immortalized human lung epithelial (AALE) cells in a two-by-two study design, in which samples received both genetic and chemical perturbations of known oncogenes/tumor suppressors and lung carcinogens. SFL demonstrated improved performance over 3’DGE in terms of coverage, power to detect differential gene expression, and biological recapitulation of patterns of differential gene expression from in vivo lung cancer mutation signatures.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam McDermaid ◽  
Brandon Monier ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Qin Ma

AbstractDifferential gene expression (DGE) is one of the most common applications of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data. This process allows for the elucidation of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across two or more conditions. Interpretation of the DGE results can be non-intuitive and time consuming due to the variety of formats based on the tool of choice and the numerous pieces of information provided in these results files. Here we present an R package, ViDGER (Visualization of Differential Gene Expression Results using R), which contains nine functions that generate information-rich visualizations for the interpretation of DGE results from three widely-used tools, Cuffdiff, DESeq2, and edgeR.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Young Shin ◽  
Sang-Heon Choi ◽  
Da-Woon Choi ◽  
Ye-Jin An ◽  
Jae-Hyuk Seo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Liang Lin ◽  
Li-Li Wang ◽  
Peng Zhao ◽  
Wen-Wen Ran ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  

Goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) is a rare amphicrine tumor and difficult to diagnose. GCA is traditionally found in the appendix, but extra-appendiceal GCA may be underestimated. Intestinal adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell component is also very rare, and some signet ring cell carcinomas are well cohesive, having some similar morphological features to GCAs. It is necessary to differentiate GCA from intestinal adenocarcinomas with cohesive signet ring cell component (IACSRCC). The goal of this study is to find occurrence of extra-appendiceal GCA and characterize the histological, immunohistochemical, transcriptional, and immune landscape of GCA. We collected 12 cases of GCAs and 10 IACSRCCs and reviewed the clinicopathologic characters of these cases. Immunohistochemical stains were performed with synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CD56, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2, and Ki-67. Whole transcriptome RNA-sequencing was performed, and data were used to analyze differential gene expression and predict immune cell infiltration levels in GCA and IACSRCC. RNA-sequencing data for colorectal adenocarcinoma were gathered from TCGA data portal. Of the 12 patients with GCA, there were 4 women and 8 men. There were three appendiceal cases and nine extra-appendiceal cases. GCAs were immunohistochemically different from IACSRCC. GCA also had different levels of B-cell and CD8+ T-cell infiltration compared to both colorectal adenocarcinoma and cohesive IACSRCCs. Differential gene expression analysis showed distinct gene expression patterns in GCA compared to colorectal adenocarcinoma, with a number of cancer-related differentially expressed genes, including upregulation of TMEM14A, GOLT1A, DSCC1, and HSD17B8, and downregulation of KCNQ1OT1 and MXRA5. GCA also had several differentially expressed genes compared to IACSRCCs, including upregulation of PRSS21, EPPIN, RPRM, TNFRSF12A, and BZRAP1, and downregulation of HIST1H2BE, TCN1, AC069363.1, RP11-538I12.2, and REG4. In summary, the number of extra-appendiceal GCA was underestimated in Chinese patients. GCA can be seen as a distinct morphological, immunohistochemical, transcriptomic, and immunological entity. The classic low-grade component of GCA and the immunoreactivity for neuroendocrine markers are the key points to diagnosing GCA.


1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1812-1820
Author(s):  
Maurizio del Poeta ◽  
Dena L. Toffaletti ◽  
Thomas H. Rude ◽  
Sara D. Sparks ◽  
Joseph Heitman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document