scholarly journals A specific protein-protein interaction accounts for the in vivo substrate selectivity of Ptp3 towards the Fus3 MAP kinase

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 2811-2827 ◽  
Author(s):  
X.-L. Zhan ◽  
K.-L. Guan
2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Lomas ◽  
A. Lourbakos ◽  
S.-A. Cumming ◽  
D. Belorgey

α1-Antitrypsin functions as a ‘mousetrap’ to inhibit its target proteinase, neutrophil elastase. The common severe Z deficiency variant (Glu342 → Lys) destabilizes the mousetrap to allow a sequential protein-protein interaction between the reactive-centre loop of one molecule and β-sheet A of another. These loop-sheet polymers accumulate within hepatocytes to form inclusion bodies that are associated with juvenile cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The lack of circulating protein predisposes the Z α1-antitrypsin homozygote to emphysema. Loop-sheet polymerization is now recognized to underlie deficiency variants of other members of the serine proteinase inhibitor (serpin) superfamily, i.e. antithrombin, C1 esterase inhibitor and α1-anti-chymotrypsin, which are associated with thrombosis, angio-oedema and emphysema respectively. Moreover, we have shown recently that the same process in a neuron-specific protein, neuroserpin, underlies a novel inclusion-body dementia, known as familial encephalopathy with neuroserpin inclusion bodies. Our understanding of the structural basis of polymerization has allowed the development of strategies to prevent the aberrant protein-protein interaction in vitro. This must now be achieved in vivo if we are to treat the associated clinical syndromes.


2000 ◽  
Vol 350 (3) ◽  
pp. 741-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian GRUSOVIN ◽  
Violet STOICHEVSKA ◽  
Keith H. GOUGH ◽  
Katrina NUNAN ◽  
Colin W. WARD ◽  
...  

munc18c is a critical protein involved in trafficking events associated with syntaxin 4 and which also mediates inhibitory effects on vesicle docking and/or fusion. To investigate the domains of munc18c responsible for its interaction with syntaxin 4, fragments of munc18c were generated and their interaction with syntaxin 4 examined in vivo by the yeast two-hybrid assay. In vitro protein–protein interaction studies were then used to confirm that the interaction between the proteins was direct. Full-length munc18c1–592, munc18c1–139 and munc18c1–225, but not munc18c226–592, munc18c1–100, munc18c43–139 or munc18c66–139, interacted with the cytoplasmic portion of syntaxin 4, Stx42–273, as assessed by yeast two-hybrid assay of growth on nutritionally deficient media and by β-galactosidase reporter induction. The N-terminal predicted helix-a-helix-b-helix-c region of syntaxin 4, Stx429–157, failed to interact with full-length munc18c1–592, indicating that a larger portion of syntaxin 4 is necessary for the interaction. The yeast two-hybrid results were confirmed by protein–protein interaction studies between Stx42–273 and glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins of munc18c. Full-length munc18c1–592, munc18c1–139 and munc18c1–225 interacted with Stx42–273 whereas munc18c1–100 did not, consistent with the yeast two-hybrid data. These data thus identify a region of munc18c between residues 1 and 139 as a minimal domain for its interaction with syntaxin 4.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Béganton ◽  
Etienne Coyaud ◽  
Estelle M. N. Laurent ◽  
Alain Mangé ◽  
Julien Jacquemetton ◽  
...  

RAS proteins (KRAS, NRAS and HRAS) are frequently activated in different cancer types (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma and bladder cancer). For many years, their activities were considered redundant due to their high degree of sequence homology (80% identity) and their shared upstream and downstream protein partners. However, the high conservation of the Hyper-Variable-Region across mammalian species, the preferential activation of different RAS proteins in specific tumor types and the specific post-translational modifications and plasma membrane-localization of each paralog suggest they could ensure discrete functions. To gain insights into RAS proteins specificities, we explored their proximal protein–protein interaction landscapes using the proximity-dependent biotin identification technology (BioID) in Flp-In T-REx 293 cell lines stably transfected and inducibly expressing wild type KRAS4B, NRAS or HRAS. We identified more than 800 high-confidence proximal interactors, allowing us to propose an unprecedented comparative analysis of wild type RAS paralogs protein networks. These data bring novel information on poorly characterized RAS functions, e.g., its putative involvement in metabolic pathways, and on shared as well as paralog-specific protein networks that could partially explain the complexity of RAS functions. These networks of protein interactions open numerous avenues to better understand RAS paralogs biological activities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 426 (9) ◽  
pp. 1883-1897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna K. Lytle ◽  
Sofia S. Origanti ◽  
Yupeng Qiu ◽  
Jeffrey VonGermeten ◽  
Sua Myong ◽  
...  

Virology ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.I. Atabekova ◽  
M.E. Taliansky ◽  
J.G. Atabekov

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (40) ◽  
pp. E8333-E8342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian G. Plach ◽  
Florian Semmelmann ◽  
Florian Busch ◽  
Markus Busch ◽  
Leonhard Heizinger ◽  
...  

Cells contain a multitude of protein complexes whose subunits interact with high specificity. However, the number of different protein folds and interface geometries found in nature is limited. This raises the question of how protein–protein interaction specificity is achieved on the structural level and how the formation of nonphysiological complexes is avoided. Here, we describe structural elements called interface add-ons that fulfill this function and elucidate their role for the diversification of protein–protein interactions during evolution. We identified interface add-ons in 10% of a representative set of bacterial, heteromeric protein complexes. The importance of interface add-ons for protein–protein interaction specificity is demonstrated by an exemplary experimental characterization of over 30 cognate and hybrid glutamine amidotransferase complexes in combination with comprehensive genetic profiling and protein design. Moreover, growth experiments showed that the lack of interface add-ons can lead to physiologically harmful cross-talk between essential biosynthetic pathways. In sum, our complementary in silico, in vitro, and in vivo analysis argues that interface add-ons are a practical and widespread evolutionary strategy to prevent the formation of nonphysiological complexes by specializing protein–protein interactions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document