scholarly journals Large impact parameter behavior in the CGC/saturation approach: A new nonlinear equation

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gotsman ◽  
E. Levin
1982 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.E. Blinov ◽  
A.E. Bondar ◽  
Yu.I. Eidelman ◽  
V.R. Groshev ◽  
S.I. Mishnev ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. DEUTSCH ◽  
P. FROMY

The electromagnetic stopping of intense and relativistic electron beams (REB) arising from femtosecond lasers interacting with a precompressed deuterium–tritium (DT) fuel is investigated within the Bohr–Fermi formalism with a large impact parameter. Dynamical intrabeam correlations in the target are shown to be quantitatively significant for various arrangements of projectile electrons and the overall REB penetration in the DT fuel.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 303-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN ELLIS ◽  
P. KANTI ◽  
N. E. MAVROMATOS ◽  
ELIZABETH WINSTANLEY ◽  
D. V. NANOPOULOS

We discuss the scattering of two light particles in a D-brane background. It is known that, if one light particle strikes the D-brane at small impact parameter, quantum recoil effects induce entanglement entropy in both the excited D-brane and the scattered particle. In this letter we compute the asymptotic "out" state of a second light particle scattering off the D-brane at large impact parameter, showing that it also becomes mixed as a consequence of quantum D-brane recoil effects. We interpret this as a non-factorizing contribution to the superscattering operator $ for the two light particles in a Liouville D-brane background, that appears when quantum D-brane excitations are taken into account.


2004 ◽  
Vol 742 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 55-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gotsman ◽  
M. Kozlov ◽  
E. Levin ◽  
U. Maor ◽  
E. Naftali

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Contreras ◽  
Eugene Levin ◽  
Rodrigo Meneses

Abstract In this paper, we show (1) that the NLO corrections do not change the power-like decrease of the scattering amplitude at large impact parameter ($$b^2 \,>\,r^2 \exp ( 2{\bar{\alpha }}_S\eta (1 + 4 {\bar{\alpha }}_S) )$$b2>r2exp(2α¯Sη(1+4α¯S)), where r denotes the size of scattering dipole and $$\eta = \ln (1/x_{Bj} )$$η=ln(1/xBj) for DIS), and, therefore, they do not resolve the inconsistency with unitarity; and (2) they lead to an oscillating behaviour of the scattering amplitude at large b, in direct contradiction with the unitarity constraints. However, from the more practical point of view, the NLO estimates give a faster decrease of the scattering amplitude as a function of b, and could be very useful for description of the experimental data. It turns out, that in a limited range of b, the NLO corrections generates the fast decrease of the scattering amplitude with b, which can be parameterized as $$N\, \propto \,\exp ( -\,\mu \,b )$$N∝exp(-μb) with $$\mu \, \propto \,1/r$$μ∝1/r in accord with the numerical estimates in Cepila et al. (Phys Rev D 99(5):051502, 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.051502, arXiv:1812.02548 [hep-ph], 2019).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document