scholarly journals Loopless nontrapping invasion-percolation model for fracking

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Quinn Norris ◽  
Donald L. Turcotte ◽  
John B. Rundle
2000 ◽  
Vol 277 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reginaldo A Zara ◽  
Roberto N Onody

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
REGINALDO A. ZARA ◽  
ROBERTO N. ONODY

We study the optimized version of the multiple invasion percolation model. Some topological aspects as the behavior of the acceptance profile, coordination number and vertex type abundance were investigated and compared to those of the ordinary invasion. Our results indicate that the clusters show a very high degree of connectivity, spoiling the usual nodes-links-blobs geometrical picture.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
john rundle ◽  
Ronaldo Ortez ◽  
Joachim Kønigslieb ◽  
Donald Turcotte

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1515-1528
Author(s):  
FATEMEH EBRAHIMI

Site invasion percolation (IP) processes are combined with bond percolation model, to study the effects of size restriction on low capillary number immiscible displacement in heterogeneous nanoporous media. Both cases of compressible (NTIP) and incompressible defender fluid (TIP) are considered. It is found that in site IP the value of mass uptake increases with the size of invader particles, if the latter is not greater than a critical value. This occurs when the accessible porosity of the medium decreases as the size of fluid particles increases. We also investigate the effect of nanopore's concentration on the mass and the anisotropy of sample spanning cluster as well as the critical exponent of trap numbers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document