Across-subject estimation of 3-back task performance using EEG signals

Author(s):  
Jinsoo Kim ◽  
Min-Ki Kim ◽  
Christian Wallraven ◽  
Sung-Phil Kim
Author(s):  
Michalis Papakostas ◽  
Konstantinos Tsiakas ◽  
Theodoros Giannakopoulos ◽  
Fillia Makedon
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Charelle Bottenheft ◽  
Anne-Marie Brouwer ◽  
Ivo Stuldreher ◽  
Eric Groen ◽  
Jan van Erp

AbstractEffects of stressors on cognitive task performance have primarily been studied in isolation, and little is known about the combined effects of two or more stressors. This study examined how a metabolic stressor (skipping breakfast) and a sensory stressor (noise) affect cognitive task performance in isolation and combined. In addition to performance, we collected physiological and subjective data to get insight in the underlying mechanisms. Twenty participants came to the lab twice, once after skipping breakfast, and once after a standardized breakfast. They performed runs of the 2-back task and the International Shopping List Task, which were alternately presented with and without noise. During the 2-back task, electrocardiography (ECG), electrodermal activity (EDA), and electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded. Subjective ratings on effort and stress were also collected. No interaction effects between the two stressors on cognitive performance were found. Skipping breakfast did not cause hypoglycemia, but resulted in subjective discomfort and a lower state of arousal (as indicated by lower heart rate and EDA). These may underly the trend for more missed responses on the 2-back task after breakfast skipping. Noise appeared to generate arousal and increased attention (reflected in higher EDA and P300) in accordance with higher experienced load and stress. This is consistent with less missed 2-back responses in noise conditions. The results indicate that individuals spent extra effort to maintain task performance in the presence of noise. We propose to use a model that, besides additional effort, takes the effect of stressors on performance into account.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soon-Cheol Chung ◽  
Ji-Hun Kwon ◽  
Hang-Woon Lee ◽  
Gye-Rae Tack ◽  
Bongsoo Lee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Allsop ◽  
Rob Gray ◽  
Heinrich Bülthoff ◽  
Lewis Chuang

In this study, we demonstrate the effects of anxiety and cognitive load on eye movement planning in an instrument flight task adhering to a single-sensor-single-indicator data visualisation design philosophy. The task was performed in neutral and anxiety conditions, while a low or high cognitive load, auditory n-back task was also performed. Cognitive load led to a reduction in the number of transitions between instruments, and impaired task performance. Changes in self-reported anxiety between the neutral and anxiety conditions positively correlated with changes in the randomness of eye movements between instruments, but only when cognitive load was high. Taken together, the results suggest that both cognitive load and anxiety impact gaze behavior, and that these effects should be explored when designing data visualization displays.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e30564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Jonassen ◽  
Tor Endestad ◽  
Alexander Neumeister ◽  
Kari Bente Foss Haug ◽  
Jens Petter Berg ◽  
...  

Pain ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (10) ◽  
pp. 1885-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Attridge ◽  
Donna Noonan ◽  
Christopher Eccleston ◽  
Edmund Keogh

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1417-1428 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Bertocci ◽  
G. M. Bebko ◽  
B. C. Mullin ◽  
S. A. Langenecker ◽  
C. D. Ladouceur ◽  
...  

BackgroundDepression in the context of bipolar disorder (BDd) is often misdiagnosed as unipolar disorder depression (UDd) leading to poor clinical outcomes for many bipolar sufferers. We examined neural circuitry supporting emotion regulation in females with either BDd or UDd as a first stage toward identifying biomarkers that may differentiate BDd from UDd.MethodFifty-seven females aged 18–45 years participated in this study: 23 with UDd, 18 with bipolar disorder type I depression (BDId) and 16 healthy females. During 3-T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the participants performed an emotional face n-back (EFNBACK) task, that is an n-back task with high (2-back) and low (0-back) memory load conditions flanked by two positive, negative or neutral face distracters. This paradigm examines executive control with emotional distracters–emotion regulation.ResultsHigh memory load with neutral face distracters elicited greater bilateral and left dorsal anterior midcingulate cortex (dAMCC) activity in UDd than in healthy and BDId females respectively, and greater bilateral putamen activity in both depressed groups versus healthy females. High memory load with happy face distracters elicited greater left putamen activity in UDd than in healthy females. Psychotropic medication was associated with greater putamen activity to these contrasts in UDd females.ConclusionsDuring high memory load with neutral face distracters, elevated dAMCC activity in UDd suggests abnormal recruitment of attentional control circuitry to maintain task performance, whereas elevated putamen activity unrelated to psychotropic medication in BDId females may suggest an attentional bias toward ambiguous neutral face distracters. Differential patterns of functional abnormalities in neural circuitry supporting attentional control during emotion regulation, especially in the dAMCC, is a promising neuroimaging measure to distinguish UDd from BDId in females.


2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182199782
Author(s):  
Ke Ma ◽  
Na Deng ◽  
Bernhard Hommel

Single-bout focused-attention meditation (FAM) and open-monitoring meditation (OMM) are assumed to bias metacontrol states towards more persistent versus more flexible processing, respectively. In Experiment 1, we tested whether monitoring and updating of working memory (WM) representations in an N-back task with high (3-back), medium (2-back), and low (1-back) WM demands (varied within participants) is affected by preceding single-bout FAM or OMM meditation (varied between participants and compared with a control group). The results showed that FAM promotes WM performance in the medium (2-back), but not in the high (3-back) or low (1-back) demand condition, whereas OMM did not affect WM performance. A replication of the 2-back condition only (Experiment 2) showed no meditation effect, but a replication of the 3-back condition only (Experiment 3) produced a similar pattern as the 2-back condition in Experiment 1, with FAM promoting performance compared with OMM and the control condition. Taken together, these findings suggest that the single-bout FAM does promote WM performance but only if the capacity demands are neither too high nor too low.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document