A Practical Method for Identifying Lesions Caused by HIFU Application: Egg White Phantom

Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Trace Amounts of Nitrite in Egg, Egg White, and Egg Yolk

Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL ◽

10.1093/jaoac/66.2.260 ◽

1983 ◽

Vol 66 (2) ◽

pp. 260-263

Author(s):

Akio Tanaka ◽

Norihide Nose ◽

Hiroyuki Masaki ◽

Yoshinori Kikuchi ◽

Hisao Iwasaki

Keyword(s):

Detection Limit ◽

Ammonium Thiocyanate ◽

Egg Yolk ◽

Practical Method ◽

Chromatographic Determination ◽

Peak Height ◽

Egg White ◽

Gas Liquid Chromatography ◽

Liquid Chromatographic

Abstract A simple, sensitive, and practical method is described for determination of nitrite in egg, egg white, and egg yolk. Egg is deproteinized by adding a mixture of ammonium thiocyanate, mercuric chloride, and zinc acetate, and centrifuged. Nitrite in the supernate is converted to tetrazolophthalazine by reaction with hydralazine in acidic solution and then determined by gas-liquid chromatography with an electroncapture detector (GLC-ECD) and a column of OV-225 on Chromosorb W(HP). Nitrite concentrations from 5 to 50 ng/mL are calculated from peak height; the detection limit is 3 ng/mL extract. Recoveries from eggs, egg whites, and egg yolks ranged from 91.7 to 98.0%. The mean nitrite concentration in 50 egg samples was 0.04 ppm (0.01-0.11 ppm) with a detection limit of 4 ng nitrite/g.

Download Full-text

The role of differential phase contrast in electron microscopy

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100108027 ◽

1978 ◽

Vol 36 (1) ◽

pp. 176-177

Author(s):

E.M. Waddell ◽

J.N. Chapman ◽

R.P. Ferrier

Keyword(s):

Phase Contrast ◽

Practical Method ◽

Position Vector ◽

Differential Phase ◽

Pure Phase ◽

Differential Phase Contrast ◽

The Difference ◽

Image Position ◽

First Moment

Dekkers and de Lang (1977) have discussed a practical method of realising differential phase contrast in a STEM. The method involves taking the difference signal from two semi-circular detectors placed symmetrically about the optic axis and subtending the same angle (2α) at the specimen as that of the cone of illumination. Such a system, or an obvious generalisation of it, namely a quadrant detector, has the characteristic of responding to the gradient of the phase of the specimen transmittance. In this paper we shall compare the performance of this type of system with that of a first moment detector (Waddell et al.1977).For a first moment detector the response function R(k) is of the form R(k) = ck where c is a constant, k is a position vector in the detector plane and the vector nature of R(k)indicates that two signals are produced. This type of system would produce an image signal given bywhere the specimen transmittance is given by a (r) exp (iϕ (r), r is a position vector in object space, ro the position of the probe, ⊛ represents a convolution integral and it has been assumed that we have a coherent probe, with a complex disturbance of the form b(r-ro) exp (iζ (r-ro)). Thus the image signal for a pure phase object imaged in a STEM using a first moment detector is b2 ⊛ ▽ø. Note that this puts no restrictions on the magnitude of the variation of the phase function, but does assume an infinite detector.

Download Full-text