A prognostic biomarker study in patients with clinical stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG0502‐A1

Purpose Emerging evidence indicates that circulating microRNAs (miRs) might act as noninvasive biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. We examined the expression pattern and clinical significance of plasma miR-9 in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Venous blood samples (6 mL) were collected from 131 patients with ESCC and 131 healthy controls, and the plasma miR-9 concentration was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The association of plasma miR-9 expression with clinicopathologic factors and survival of patients with ESCC was evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to evaluate the clinical value of plasma miR-9 for ESCC diagnosis. Results The plasma miR-9 expression levels in patients with ESCC were significantly upregulated compared with normal controls. High plasma miR-9 concentrations were significantly correlated with poor tumor differentiation, large tumor size, deep local invasion, lymph node metastasis, advanced clinical stage, and poor survival. ROC curve analysis showed that the plasma miR-9 concentration could efficiently distinguish patients with ESCC from healthy controls. Multivariate survival analysis confirmed plasma miR-9 as an independent prognostic factor for ESCC. Conclusions Plasma miR-9 expression was upregulated in ESCC and might act as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker.

Download Full-text

Real-world outcomes of esophagectomy versus chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.178 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 178-178

Author(s):

Hiroki Yukami ◽

Kentaro Sawada ◽

Hisashi Fujiwara ◽

Saori Mishima ◽

Daisuke Kotani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽

Cell Carcinoma ◽

Squamous Cell ◽

Real World ◽

Standard Treatment ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Stage I ◽

Comparable Efficacy ◽

Tumor Depth

178 Background: Recently, JCOG0502 trial have shown a comparable efficacy with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and esophagectomy as standard treatment in patients with clinical stage (cStage) I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), showing the standard treatment option of CRT. However, there is few reports for comparison of clinical outcomes with these treatments in real-world. The aim of this study was to clarify the real-world outcomes in cStage I ESCC who performed with CRT or esophagectomy. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with clinical stage I ESCC who received thoracoscopic or open esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection or CRT mainly consisted of 5-fluorouracil and platinum with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy/28Fr or 60 Gy/30Fr) between 2009 and 2017 at National Cancer Center Hospital East. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences were evaluated using the log-rank test. Results: Among a total of 156 patients, 128 were male and median age was 68 years old. 120 and 36 patients underwent esophagectomy and CRT, respectively. ECOG performance status 0/1/2 were 138/12/6 patients. Tumor location was Ut/Mt/Lt in 16/87/53 patients. Clinical tumor depth (MM-SM1/SM2-SM3) were 33/123 patients. Patients’ characteristics were similar among treatment groups, except clinical tumor depth (SM2-3; 84.2% in esophagectomy group vs. 61.1% in CRT group, p = 0.005). All patients underwent radical surgery in esophagectomy group, while three patients (8.3%) in CRT group were received additional esophagectomy or endoscopic resection due to residual disease. With a median follow-up of 72 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rate were 81.5%/77.0% in esophagectomy group and 82.6/74.4% in CRT group (p = 0.89 and p = 0.48). In safety profile, grade 3 or higher stenosis was observed in 21.7% of esophagectomy group. There was no treatment-related death in both groups. In subgroup analysis for OS, elderly patients (75 years and older) tended to have better 5-year OS rate in CRT group (76.9% in esophagectomy group vs. 81.8% in CRT group), while younger patients ( < 75 years) showed comparable 5-year OS rate in both groups (82.4% in esophagectomy group vs. 82.9% in CRT group). Conclusions: Real-world data reproduced the results of clinical trial, supporting CRT as one of the standard treatment options in patients with cStage I ESCC.

Download Full-text