Life after an out‐of‐home placement: What biological parents in foster care tell us about parenthood

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruwayda Said Salem ◽  
Lieselot De Wilde
1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1057-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Zlotnick ◽  
Marjorie J Robertson ◽  
Marguerite A Wright

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia Euser ◽  
Lenneke R.A. Alink ◽  
Anne Tharner ◽  
Marinus H. van IJzendoorn ◽  
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg

2021 ◽  
pp. 251610322199277
Author(s):  
Camille Danner Touati ◽  
Raphaële Miljkovitch ◽  
Aino Sirparanta ◽  
Anne-Sophie Deborde

Background: Childhood abuse is associated with increased lifetime suicidal risk (SR). Among victims of abuse, children in out-of-home care are also at risk. Out-of-home placement is aimed at stopping further exposure to maltreatment and at providing the necessary security for proper development. Research suggests that placement arrangements may impact children’s mental health outcomes. Objective: The study was aimed at examining (1) the direct effects of different placement characteristics (i.e. age at first placement, number of placements, placement disruptions, total time in care, contact with biological parents, contact with siblings, placement with siblings) on SR and (2) whether these characteristics moderate the link between maltreatment and SR. Participants: The sample consisted of 77 adults (52 women; 25 men; mean age: 26.6 years) who received out-of-home care during childhood. Method: Participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (for SR). Participants’ records were used to determine placement characteristics and maltreatment. Results: PLS-PM analyses suggest a significant role of risk (age at first placement, number of placements, placement disruptions, contact with biological parents) and protective factors (contact with siblings, foster home placement) on SR. Risk factors also moderate the link between maltreatment and SR. Conclusions: Interventions aimed at limiting risk factors during placement seem important to reduce SR.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-625
Author(s):  
Sookyung Yoon ◽  
Sang-Gyun Lee ◽  
Joan Yoo ◽  
Bong Joo Lee ◽  
Sewon Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 154120402110276
Author(s):  
Caitlin M. Brady ◽  
Jennifer H. Peck

While prior studies of juvenile court outcomes have examined the impact of legal representation on out-of-home placement versus community sanctions, previous research has not fully explored the variation within sanctions that youth receive. The current study examines the influence of type of legal representation (public defender or private attorney) when predicting juvenile adjudications and dispositions. Using a sample of delinquent referrals from a Northeast state between 2009 and 2014, results showed that youth do receive different outcomes (e.g., probation, drug and alcohol treatment, accountability-oriented dispositions, etc.) based on the type of legal representation. The findings have important implications for juvenile court processing related to how courtroom actors impact case outcomes.


Genealogy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Burcu Akan Ellis

International norms do not diffuse linearly; they are localized, adapted and contested at every turn. Foster care systems have been enthusiastically promoted by international organizations to serve the best interests of children. This study explores the recent adaptation of foster care (Koruyucu Aile) in Turkey. This elite-driven norm change was institutionalized through comprehensive legislation, economic incentives and national campaigns, situated in the “politics of responsibility” arising from moral duty and national and religious ethics. These efforts faced early resistance, leading to slow cultivation of foster families, while over time, the foster system found unlikely allies among urban middle-class women. Using Zimmermann’s typologies of reinterpretation of norms through an analysis of narratives about foster parenting in 50 local and national TV productions, this article shows how the foster family system has evolved as a panacea for women’s empowerment in contemporary Turkish society. In parallel, Turkey has embarked on an intense criticism of the care of ethnic Turkish children in European foster care systems. However, this creative utilization of the foster system has come at the cost of the rights of biological parents and a permanency that has decoupled the Turkish foster care system from its counterparts around the world.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document