Amplification of the telomerase RNA component gene as a new genetic marker for disease progression and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a
Author(s):  
J.-D. Wang ◽  
J. Ma ◽  
F.-Y. Wang ◽  
L.-B. Peng ◽  
X. Wang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 207-207
Author(s):  
Ken Kato ◽  
Yuichiro Doki ◽  
Takashi Ura ◽  
Yasuo Hamamoto ◽  
Takashi Kojima ◽  
...  

207 Background:ATTRACTION-1/ONO-4538-07 (AT-1), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial conducted in Japan, evaluated the clinical activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory/intolerant to fluoropyrimidine-, platinum-, and taxane-based chemotherapy. We previously reported the 2-year follow-up findings of AT-1, in which nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile for these patients. Here we report the final findings from AT-1 at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Methods:Patients aged ≥20 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-1 received 3 mg/kg nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks in 6-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally-assessed objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of patients whose best overall response was either a complete or partial response. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), investigator-assessed ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), change in tumor burden, time to response, time to disease progression, and duration of response. Results:Between February 25 and November 14, 2014, a total of 65 patients were enrolled. Sixty-four patients were evaluated for the efficacy, and all patients were evaluated for the safety. At the final database lock on August 6, 2020, 11 (17.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.9-28.2) of 64 patients had an objective response by central assessment. The median OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.4-13.9), and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 6.3% (95% CI, 2.0-14.0). The median PFS was 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.8), and the estimated 5-year PFS rate was 6.8% (95% CI, 2.2-15.1). Treatment-related adverse events that occurred with a frequency of > 10% were diarrhea and rash. The presentation will include characteristics of long-term survivors as well as detailed efficacy and safety data of nivolumab. Conclusions:This final assessment represents the longest follow-up of patients with advanced ESCC treated with nivolumab. Nivolumab demonstrated continued long-term efficacy in these patients based on a minimum of 5-year long-term survival update of AT-1. Furthermore, no new safety signals with nivolumab were identified during long-term follow-up. These findings are consistent with those of nivolumab monotherapy for various types of cancer. Clinical trial information: No.142422.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15559-e15559
Author(s):  
Xi Wang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Xuelian Chen ◽  
Hongnan Mo ◽  
Dawei Wu ◽  
...  

e15559 Background: A small proportion of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) could benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors, and reliable peripheral blood biomarkers for outcomes of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were not identified in ESCC. Methods: A total of 43 patients were retrospectively reviewed in the ESCC cohort of a phase I trial from our center. All patients received intravenous camrelizumab (SHR-1210), a novel anti-PD-1 antibody, at a dose of 60 mg, 200 mg or 400 mg (4-week interval after first dose followed by a 2-week schedule) and repeated every two weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The associations between lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as well as other peripheral blood biomarkers at baseline and the efficacy of camrelizumab were also investigated. Results: With a median follow-up of 19.6 months, the overall response rate was 25.6% (11/43), including one complete response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 2.0 months (95% CI: 0-4.1 months) and 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.8 months), respectively. Notably, four patients achieved a PFS exceeding 12 months, including three patients with a long-lasting duration of response over 1 year. Patients with an elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase had lower tumor response rates (8.3% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.02) as well as shorter PFS (median: 1.8 vs. 4.0 months; HR 0.39, p = 0.002) and overall survival (median: 4.2 vs. 10.4 months; HR 0.22, p < 0.0001) compared with patients with normal levels. An increase of lactate dehydrogenase level during treatment was significantly associated with disease progression (p = 0.014). Multivariate Cox analysis identified LDH (HR = 0.18), C-reactive protein (HR = 0.27), number of involved organs (HR = 0.31), absolute monocyte count (HR = 0.33) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR = 0.36) as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Serum LDH, as is readily available in routine clinical practice, is a potential marker for response and a powerful independent factor for survival in advanced ESCC patients receiving anti-PD-1 treatment.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e109026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Vay ◽  
Stefan B. Hosch ◽  
Nikolas H. Stoecklein ◽  
Christoph A. Klein ◽  
Daniel Vallböhmer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4012-4012
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Kuaile Zhao ◽  
...  

4012 Background: Tislelizumab (tisle) monotherapy or plus chemotherapy demonstrated antitumor activity in patients (pts) with solid tumors, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (NCT03469557 and CTR20160872). Methods: In this global phase 3 study (NCT03430843), adults with histologically confirmed advanced/unresectable or metastatic ESCC whose disease progressed following prior systemic therapy with ≥1 evaluable lesion per RECIST v1.1 and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG PS) of ≤1 were included. Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive tisle 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator-chosen standard chemotherapy ([ICC]; paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan) and treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Stratification factors included ICC option, region, and ECOG PS. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The key secondary endpoint was OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)+ population (visually-estimated combined positive score [vCPS] ≥10%, by VENTANA PD-L1 SP263 assay). Other secondary endpoints included (by RECIST v1.1) progression-free survival, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Results: Overall, 512 pts (median age: 62 years; range 35-86 years) from 132 sites in 10 countries in Asia (404 pts [79%]), Europe, and North America (108 pts [21%]) were randomized to tisle (n=256) or ICC (n=256) (ITT population). Of these, 157 pts (tisle [n=89], ICC [n=68]) had vCPS ≥10% (PD-L1+ population). On 1 Dec 2020 (data cut-off), median follow-up was 8.5 months (m) with tisle and 5.8 m with ICC. The study met its primary endpoint: tisle clinically and significantly improved OS vs ICC in the ITT population (median OS: 8.6 vs 6.3 m; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85, p=0.0001). Tisle also demonstrated significant improvement in OS vs ICC in the PD-L1+ population (median OS: 10.3 vs 6.8 m; HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.79, p=0.0006). Survival benefit was consistently observed across pre-defined subgroups, including baseline PD-L1 status and region. Treatment with tisle was also associated with a higher ORR (20.3% vs 9.8%) and more durable response (median DoR: 7.1 vs 4.0 m; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.75) than ICC in the ITT population. Fewer pts had ≥Grade 3 (46% vs 68%) treatment-emergent adverse events with tisle vs ICC. Of these, fewer ≥Grade 3 AEs were treatment-related (TR) with tisle vs ICC (19% vs 56%). Fewer pts discontinued tisle vs ICC (7% vs 14%) due to a TRAE. Conclusion: Tisle demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS vs ICC in pts with advanced or metastatic ESCC who had disease progression during or after first-line systemic therapy. Tisle showed a higher and longer response vs ICC. The safety profile of tisle was more favorable than ICC. Clinical trial information: NCT03430843.


2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
K. Minashi ◽  
T. Yano ◽  
T. Kojima ◽  
M. Onozawa ◽  
K. Nihei ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document