scholarly journals Associations of pre-transplant anemia management with post-transplant delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 782-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miklos Z. Molnar ◽  
Csaba P. Kovesdy ◽  
Laszlo Rosivall ◽  
Suphamai Bunnapradist ◽  
Junichi Hoshino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Anemia Management

MO941CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN KIDNEY RE-TRANSPLANTATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Pardinhas ◽  
Rita Leal ◽  
Francisco Caramelo ◽  
Teofilo Yan ◽  
Carolina Figueiredo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
First Year ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Background and Aims As kidney transplants are growing in absolute numbers, so are patients with failed allografts and thus potential candidates for re-transplantation. Re-transplantation is challenging due to immunological barriers, surgical difficulties and clinical complexities but it has been proven that successful second transplantation improves life expectancy over dialysis. It is important to evaluate re-transplantation outcomes since 20% of patients on the waiting list are waiting for a second graft. Our aim was to compare major clinical outcomes such as acute rejection, graft and patient survival, between patients receiving a first or a second kidney transplant. Method We performed a retrospective study, that included 1552 patients submitted to a first (N=1443, 93%) or a second kidney transplant (N=109, 7%), between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients with more than 2 grafts or multi-organ transplant were excluded. Demographic, clinical and histocompatibility characteristics of both groups were registered from our unit database and compared. Delayed graft function was defined has the need of dialysis in the first week post-transplant. All acute rejection episodes were biopsy proven, according to Banff 2017 criteria. Follow-up time was defined at 1st June 2020 for functioning grafts or at graft failure (including death with a functioning graft). Results Recipients of a second graft were significantly younger (43 ±12 vs 50 ± 13 years old, p<0.001) and there were significantly fewer expanded-criteria donors in the second transplant group (31.5% vs 57.5%, p<0.001). The waiting time for a second graft was longer (63±50 vs 48±29 months, p=0.011). HLA mismatch was similar for both groups but PRA was significantly higher for second KT patients (21.6±25% versus 3±9%; p<0.001). All patients submitted to a second KT had thymoglobulin as induction therapy compared to 16% of the first KT group (p<0.001). We found no difference in primary dysfunction or delayed graft function between groups. Acute rejection was significantly more frequent in second kidney transplant recipients (19% vs 5%, p<0.001), being 10 acute cellular rejections, 7 were antibody mediated and 3 were borderline changes. For the majority of the patients (85%), acute rejection occurred in the first-year post-transplant. Death censored graft failure occurred in 236 (16.4%) patients with first kidney transplant and 25 (23%) patients with a second graft, p=0.08. Survival analysis showed similar graft survival for both groups (log-rank p=0.392). We found no difference in patients’ mortality at follow up for both groups. Conclusion Although second graft patients presented more episodes of biopsy proven acute rejection, especially at the first-year post-transplant, we found no differences in death censored graft survival or patients’ mortality for patients with a second kidney transplant. Second transplants should be offered to patients whenever feasible.

scholarly journals A Prospective Controlled Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of in vitro Expanded Recipient Regulatory T Cell Therapy and Tocilizumab Together With Donor Bone Marrow Infusion in HLA-Mismatched Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (Trex001)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Oberbauer ◽  
Matthias Edinger ◽  
Gabriela Berlakovich ◽  
Peter Kalhs ◽  
Nina Worel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Donor Bone Marrow ◽  
Living Donor Kidney Transplant

Background: The induction of donor-specific immunological tolerance could improve outcome after kidney transplantation. However, no tolerance protocol is available for routine clinical use. Chimerism-based regimens hold promise, but their widespread application is impeded in part by unresolved safety issues. This study tests the hypothesis that therapy with polyclonal recipient regulatory T cells (Tregs) and anti-IL6R (tocilizumab) leads to transient chimerism and achieves pro-tolerogenic immunomodulation in kidney transplant recipients also receiving donor bone marrow (BM) without myelosuppressive conditioning of the recipient.Methods/design: A prospective, open-label, controlled, single-center, phase I/IIa academic study is performed in HLA-mismatched living donor kidney transplant recipients.Study group: Recipients of the study group receive in vitro expanded recipient Tregs and a donor bone marrow cell infusion within 3 days after transplantation and tocilizumab for the first 3 weeks post-transplant. In addition they are treated with thymoglobulin, belatacept, sirolimus, and steroids as immunosuppression. Starting 6 months post-transplant, sirolimus and steroids are withdrawn in a step-wise manner in stable patients.Control group: Recipients of the control group are treated with thymoglobulin, belatacept, sirolimus, and steroids as immunosuppression. Co-primary endpoints of safety (impaired graft function [eGFR <35 mL/min/1.73 m2], graft-vs.-host disease or patient death by 12 months) and efficacy (total leukocyte donor chimerism within 28 days post-transplant) are assessed. Secondary endpoints include frequency of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes and subclinical rejection episodes on surveillance biopsies, assessment of kidney graft function, and the evaluation whether the study protocol leads to detectable changes in the immune system indicative of pro-tolerogenic immune modulation.Discussion: The results of this trial will provide evidence whether treatment with recipient Tregs and donor BM is feasible, safe and efficacious in leading to transient chimerism. If successful, this combination cell therapy has the potential to become a novel treatment option for immunomodulation in organ transplantation without the toxicities associated with myelosuppressive recipient conditioning.Trial registration: European Clinical Trials Database EudraCT Nr 2018-003142-16 and clinicaltrials.gov NCT03867617.

Urinary TIMP-2 predicts the presence and duration of delayed graft function in DCD kidney transplant recipients

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. S181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonna Bank ◽  
Renee Ruhaak ◽  
Darius Soonawala ◽  
Fred Romijn ◽  
Cees Kooten van ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

Perioperative Hemoglobin and Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. S462
Author(s):  
Sarah MacIsaac ◽  
Agnihotram Ramankumar ◽  
Nasim Saberi ◽  
Veronique Naessens ◽  
Marcelo Cantarovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients

scholarly journals Graft Function, Albuminuria, and the Risk of Hemorrhage and Thrombosis After Kidney Transplantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205435812095219
Author(s):  
Rachel Jeong ◽  
Robert R. Quinn ◽  
Pietro Ravani ◽  
Feng Ye ◽  
Manish M. Sood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Lower Egfr ◽  
Risk Of Hemorrhage

Background: Compared to the general population, kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of hemorrhage and thrombosis. Whether this risk is affected by graft function and albuminuria is unknown. Objective: To determine the association between graft function and albuminuria and the risk of post-transplant hemorrhage and thrombosis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: We used linked health care databases in Alberta, Canada. Patients/sample/participants: We included adult kidney transplant recipients from 2002 to 2015 with a functioning graft at 1 year. Measurements: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria measurements at 1 year post-transplant were used to categorize recipients (eGFR: ≥45 vs. <45 mL/min/1.73 m2; albuminuria: absence vs. presence). We determined the rates of post-transplant hemorrhage and venous thrombosis based on validated diagnostic and procedural codes. Methods: We determined the association between categories of eGFR and albuminuria and post-transplant hemorrhage and venous thrombosis using Poisson regression with log link. Results: Of 1284 kidney transplant recipients, 21% had an eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 40% had presence of albuminuria at 1 year post-transplant. Over a median follow-up of 6 years, there were 100 hemorrhages (12.6 events per 1000 person-years) and 57 venous thrombosis events (7.1 events per 1000 person-years). The age- and sex-adjusted rate of hemorrhage and thrombosis was over 2-fold higher in recipients with lower eGFR and presence of albuminuria compared to higher eGFR and no albuminuria (hemorrhage: incidence rate ratio, IRR, 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-4.4, P = .001; thrombosis: IRR, 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1-5.0, P = .046). Limitations: Complete relevant medication information, such as anticoagulants, were not available in our datasets. Due to sample size, this study was underpowered to conduct a fully adjusted analysis. Conclusion: Among kidney transplant recipients, lower eGFR and presence of albuminuria at 1 year post-transplant were associated with an over 2-fold higher risk of hemorrhage and venous thrombosis. Graft function and albuminuria at 1 year post-transplant are important prognostic factors in determining risk of post-transplant hemorrhage and venous thrombosis. Further research, including medication data, are needed to further delineate outcomes and safety. Trial registration: Not applicable (cohort study).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document