Verbal operant conditioning as a function of extraversion and reinforcement

1989 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita Gupta ◽  
A. P. Shukla
1969 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Drennen ◽  
William Gallman ◽  
Gene Sausser

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 875-883 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. William Miller

The general relationship of awareness to learning efficiency was investigated in a 2 × 2 factorial design with 20 Ss in each of four groups. Classical conditioning of meaning and verbal operant conditioning procedures were studied under two sets of instructions: one stated vague experimental purposes and the other, exact purposes. Ss' awareness of experimental procedures and purposes was measured Results indicated that with both classical and operant conditioning change in meaning occurred without awareness by Ss. A classical conditioning explanation of change in meaning was supported, but an operant conditioning explanation of change in terms of response frequency was not strengthened.


1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 745-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy W. Persons

An inmate peer and an adult professional were used as Es in a verbal conditioning study with sociopaths. The sociopaths were conditioned as a function of verbal reinforcement. They conditioned more readily to guilty content than to hostile content. The sociopaths emitted significantly more hostile verbs when reinforced by the adult E than when reinforced by the inmate E.


1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1037-1040
Author(s):  
Kenneth H. David ◽  
T. E. Dielman

An investigation of the effect of different reinforcement schedules (RS) upon conditioning and awareness in a verbal operant conditioning situation (VOC). 40 Ss were given Taffel's sentence-completion task with one-half of Ss given an intertrial color-naming task (ICN). Ss were placed on a 100%, 66%, 33%, or 0% RS for Trials 11–100, with no reinforcement given during Trials 101 to 150. The 100% and 66% RS groups showed conditioning of “I-we” responses ( p < .01) and a decrease in the correct response during extinction ( p < .01). The 33% RS group failed to condition ( p > .05). ICN had no effect upon VOC or awareness as measured by Dulany's post-conditioning interview ( p > .05).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document