THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRIME NUMBERS; LARGE SIEVES AND ZERO-DENSITY THEOREMS

1974 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
E. J. Scourfield
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 748-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habiba Kadiri ◽  
Nathan Ng

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1365-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Heath-Brown

1. Introduction. Many problems involving prime numbers depend on estimating sums of the form ΣΛ(n)f(n), for appropriate functions f(n), (here, as usual, Λ(n) is the von Mangoldt function). Three distinct general methods have been used to estimate such sums. The earliest is due to Vinogradov (see [13, Chapter 9]); the second involves zerodensity bounds for Dirichlet L–functions (see [8, Chapters 15 and 16] for example); and the third, due to Vaughan (see [12] for example) uses an arithmetical identity as will be explained later. The second and third methods are much simpler to apply than the first. On the other hand Vinogradov's technique is at least as powerful as Vaughan's and occasionally more so. In many cases Vaughan's identity yields better bounds than the use of zero–density estimates, but sometimes they are worse. The object of this paper is to present a simple extension of Vaughan's method which is essentially as powerful as any of the techniques mentioned above, to discuss its general implications, and to apply it to the proof of the following result of Huxley [4], which has previously only been within the scope of the zero density method.


2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-324
Author(s):  
C. Bauer
Keyword(s):  

Let pi, 2 ≤ i ≤ 5 be prime numbers. It is proved that all but ≪ x23027/23040+ε even integers N ≤ x can be written as N = p21 + p32 + p43 + p45.


1987 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Aversa ◽  
Preiss
Keyword(s):  

1977 ◽  
Vol 1 (S2) ◽  
pp. 7-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Zagier
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 657-666
Author(s):  
Bingzhe Hou ◽  
Yue Xin ◽  
Aihua Zhang

AbstractLet x = $\begin{array}{} \displaystyle \{x_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty} \end{array}$ be a sequence of positive numbers, and 𝓙x be the collection of all subsets A ⊆ ℕ such that $\begin{array}{} \displaystyle \sum_{k\in A} \end{array}$xk < +∞. The aim of this article is to study how large the summable subsequence could be. We define the upper density of summable subsequences of x as the supremum of the upper asymptotic densities over 𝓙x, SUD in brief, and we denote it by D*(x). Similarly, the lower density of summable subsequences of x is defined as the supremum of the lower asymptotic densities over 𝓙x, SLD in brief, and we denote it by D*(x). We study the properties of SUD and SLD, and also give some examples. One of our main results is that the SUD of a non-increasing sequence of positive numbers tending to zero is either 0 or 1. Furthermore, we obtain that for a non-increasing sequence, D*(x) = 1 if and only if $\begin{array}{} \displaystyle \liminf_{k\to\infty}nx_n=0, \end{array}$ which is an analogue of Cauchy condensation test. In particular, we prove that the SUD of the sequence of the reciprocals of all prime numbers is 1 and its SLD is 0. Moreover, we apply the results in this topic to improve some results for distributionally chaotic linear operators.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050036
Author(s):  
Morteza Baniasad Azad ◽  
Behrooz Khosravi

In this paper, we prove that the direct product [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] are distinct numbers, is uniquely determined by its complex group algebra. Particularly, we show that the direct product [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text]’s are distinct odd prime numbers, is uniquely determined by its order and three irreducible character degrees.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document