scholarly journals Comparison of Pharmacist-Directed Management of Multiplex PCR Blood Culture Results with Conventional Microbiology Methods on Effective and Optimal Therapy within a Community Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Porter ◽  
Christopher M. Bland ◽  
Henry N. Young ◽  
David R. Allen ◽  
Sabrina R. Croft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Multiplex Pcr ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Pharmacist Intervention ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus ◽  
Optimal Therapy

ABSTRACT Multiplex PCR combined with a pharmacist-driven reporting protocol was compared to the standard of care within a community hospital to evaluate initial changes after notification of a positive blood culture. The intervention group demonstrated decreased times to changes in antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.0081), increased changes to optimal antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.013), and decreased vancomycin use for coagulase-negative staphylococcus contaminants (P < 0.01) with multiplex PCR implementation and pharmacist intervention.

scholarly journals 48. Association of Rapid Pathogen Identification and Pharmacist Intervention on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy for Bloodstream Infections at Two Community Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
Bryant M Froberg ◽  
Nicholas Torney
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Pharmacist Intervention ◽  
Pathogen Identification ◽  
Community Hospitals ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background As many as 1 in 3 patients with bloodstream infections at community hospitals receive inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy. Studies have shown that the coupling of real-time intervention with rapid pathogen identification improves patient outcomes and decreases health-system costs at large, tertiary academic centers. The aim of this study was to assess if similar outcomes could be obtained with the implementation of real-time pharmacist intervention to rapid pathogen identification at two smaller, rural community hospitals. Methods This was a pre-post implementation study that occurred from September of 2019 to March 2020. This study included patients ≥18 years of age admitted with one positive blood culture. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, had a polymicrobial blood culture, known culture prior to admission, hospice consulted prior to admission, expired prior to positive blood culture, or transferred to another hospital within 24 hours of a positive blood culture. Endpoints of patients prior to intervention were compared to patients post-implementation. The primary endpoint was time to optimal antimicrobial therapy. Secondary endpoints included time to effective antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of hospitalization. Results Of 212 patients screened, 88 patients were included with 44 patients in each group. Both groups were similar in terms of comorbidities, infection source, and causative microbial. No significant difference was seen in the mean time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (27.3±35.5 hr vs 19.4± 30 hr, p=0.265). Patients in the post-implementation group had a significantly higher mean hospitalization cost ($24,638.87± $11,080.91 vs $32,722.07±$13,076.73, p=0.013). There was no significant difference in time to effective antimicrobial therapy, in-hospital mortality, or length of hospital stay. Conclusion There were no between-group differences in the primary outcome of time to optimal therapy, with a higher mean hospitalization cost after implementation. These results suggest further antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed, along with larger studies conducted in the community hospital settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Blood Culture Contamination in a Community Hospital- less than 2% is achievable

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S127-S127
Author(s):  
R Bedi ◽  
J Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Proper Order ◽  
Multiple Devices ◽  
American Society

Abstract Introduction/Objective Blood cultures are commonly obtained to evaluate the presence of bacteria or fungal infection in a patient’s bloodstream. The presence of living microorganisms circulating in the bloodstream is of substantial prognostic and diagnostic importance. A positive blood culture indicates a reason for the patient’s illness and provides the etiological agent for antimicrobial therapy. Collection of blood culture is an exact process that requires time, the proper order of draw, and following of correct protocol. The busy Emergency department that requires multiple demands for nurse’s time, turnover of staff, rushing from one task to another can result in the improper collection and false-positive blood cultures. The national benchmark is set at 3% by the American Society of Clinical Microbiology (ASM) and The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). False-positive blood culture results in increased length of stay and unnecessary antimicrobial therapy, resulting in an increased cost burden to the hospital of about $5000 per patient. Methods/Case Report At our 150-bed community hospital, 26 beds Emergency Department, we have come a long way in reduction of our blood culture contamination rates from upwards of 4% to less than 2%, far lower than the national benchmark. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) NA Conclusion There are multiple devices available from various manufacturers claiming to reduce blood culture contamination. These devices do reduce blood culture (BC) contamination but at an added cost of the device. The rate of BC can be reduced and less than 3% is achievable by materials available in the laboratory. We have achieved this by providing training to every new staff by demonstration and direct observation, providing everything required for collection in a kit, using proper technique, the inclusion of diversion method that involves the aseptic collection of a clear tube before collecting blood cultures, and following up monthly on any false positive blood cultures.

scholarly journals 1998. Impact of Rapid Blood Culture Identification with Real-Time Antimicrobial Stewardship (ASP) in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Enterococcus spp. Bacteremia at a Large Academic Medical Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S670-S670
Author(s):  
Hannah Ryan Russo ◽  
Kady Phe ◽  
Mayar Al Mohajer ◽  
Jessica Hirase
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Active Therapy ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Optimal Therapy ◽  
Enterococcus Spp ◽  
Culture Identification

Abstract Background The initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is dependent on timely identification of the pathogen. FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel (BCID) is a rapid, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel that identifies 24 pathogens and 3 antibiotic resistance genes associated with bloodstream infections within 1 hour of growth. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical impact of rapid BCID testing vs. standard blood culture processing, both coupled with real-time ASP, in patients with S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. bacteremia. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective chart review conducted as a pre-post intervention quasi-experimental study. The pre-intervention group included adult patients with S.aureus and Enterococcus spp. bacteremia identified by standard blood culture processing (PRE) and the post-intervention group included those identified by rapid BCID testing (POST). The primary endpoint was time in hours from positive Gram stain to initiation of optimal antimicrobial therapy [defined as vancomycin (VAN), linezolid (LZD), daptomycin (DAP), or ceftaroline for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA); nafcillin or cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA); DAP or LZD for VAN-resistant Enterococcus (VRE); VAN or ampicillin (if susceptible) for VAN-susceptible Enterococcus (VSE)]. Secondary endpoints included time to active therapy (defined as an antimicrobial to which the organism was susceptible), time to identification of pathogen, length of hospital stay (LOS) after positive culture, and 30-day mortality. Results 132 patients were included. Mean time to optimal therapy decreased from 21.4 hours PRE to 10.7 hours POST (P = 0.048). Time to optimal therapy was shorter POST for MSSA [59.2 hours PRE vs. 25.8 hours POST (P < 0.001)] and VRE bacteremia [24.6 hours PRE vs. 5.6 hours POST (P = 0.005)]. Time to identification of pathogen decreased from 75.6 hours PRE to 2.7 hours POST (P < 0.001). Groups did not differ in time to active therapy, LOS, nor 30-day mortality. Conclusion Antimicrobial Stewardship coupled with rapid BCID testing significantly decreased time to pathogen identification as well as time to optimal therapy in patients with S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. bacteremia, most notably for MSSA and VRE. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Automated Alerts Coupled with Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Lead to Decreases in Length of Stay in Patients with Gram-Negative Bacteremia

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Pogue ◽  
Ryan P. Mynatt ◽  
Dror Marchaim ◽  
Jing J. Zhao ◽  
Viktorija O. Barr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteremia ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Objective.To assess the impact of active alerting of positive blood culture data coupled with stewardship intervention on time to appropriate therapy, length of stay, and mortality in patients with gram-negative bacteremia.Design.Quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study in patients with gram-negative bacteremia at the Detroit Medical Center from 2009 to 2011.Setting.Three hospitals (1 community, 2 academic) with active antimicrobial stewardship programs within the Detroit Medical Center.Patients.All patients with monomicrobial gram-negative bacteremia during the study period.Intervention.Active alerting of positive blood culture data coupled with stewardship intervention (2010-2011) compared with patients who received no formalized stewardship intervention (2009).Results.Active alerting and intervention led to a decreased time to appropriate therapy (8 [interquartile range (IQR), 2-24] vs 14 [IQR, 2-35] hours; P = .014) in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. After controlling for differences between groups, being in the intervention arm was associated with an independent reduction in length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-0.86]), correlating to a median attributable decrease in length of stay of 2.2 days. Additionally, multivariate modeling of patients who were not on appropriate antimicrobial therapy at the time of initial culture positivity showed that patients in the intervention group had a significant reduction in both length of stay (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.86]) and infection-related mortality (OR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.08-0.76]).Conclusions.Active alerting coupled with stewardship intervention in patients with gram-negative bacteremia positively impacted time to appropriate therapy, length of stay, and mortality and should be a target of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

scholarly journals 2178. Sensitivity of Blood Cultures in Detection of Bacteremia in Febrile Neutropenia

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S739-S739
Author(s):  
Vanisha Patel ◽  
Jose Amadeo A Ferrolino ◽  
Randall Hayden ◽  
Randall Hayden ◽  
Aditya H Gaur
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Culture Media ◽  
Febrile Episode ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus ◽  
Media Type ◽  
Time To Detection

Abstract Background Febrile neutropenia (FN) secondary to bacteremia is a treatable complication of chemotherapy that increases mortality if not promptly recognized and managed. Methods The sensitivity of blood cultures collected in pediatric oncology patients with FN was assessed and stratified based on the day of FN episode, culture media type, and the source of blood culture draw at a single US center between 2013 and 2018. Paired aerobic and lytic media bottles were inoculated with each culture draw using a weight-based volume of blood; anaerobic cultures were included with initial cultures starting in September of 2015. Results In a retrospective analysis of 10,596 patients, a total of 3,039 episodes of FN were identified. Of the FN episodes, 17.7% had at least one positive blood culture; 84.5%, 1.3%, 0.9% and 13.3% of positive cultures were collected on day 0, day 1, day 2 and ≥ day 3 of a febrile episode. Among the positive day 0 cultures, the median time to detection of an organism was 14.1 hours. Host characteristics of blood culture-positive FN episodes are summarized in Table 1. Bacteremia was identified in 537 FN cases; 18.1%, 11.9% and 2.6% of cultures were positive in only aerobic, lytic or anaerobic media cultures, respectively. The most commonly isolated organisms were Escherichia coli, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, viridans group streptococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Fifteen percent of infectious episodes with a positive blood culture were polymicrobial. Conclusion In summary, the study findings have important clinical implications such as emphasizing the value of day 0 cultures and highlighting the importance of routinely collecting blood cultures in more than one media type. Despite an optimized blood culture approach, less than a fifth of FN episodes had a blood culture-based diagnosis. Disclosures Randall Hayden, MD, Abbott Molecular: Advisory Board; Quidel: Advisory Board; Roche Diagnostics: Advisory Board.

scholarly journals 298. Multicenter retrospective cohort study of the clinical significance of Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolated from a single blood culture set

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S147-S148
Author(s):  
Naomi Hauser ◽  
Justin Kim ◽  
Paul Luethy ◽  
Sarah Schmalzle ◽  
Jacqueline Bork
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus ◽  
Staphylococcus Lugdunensis ◽  
Clinical Criteria

Abstract Background Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) species with the potential to cause aggressive infection. Guidance surrounding S. lugdunensis bacteremia (SLB) is lacking, especially in the case of a single positive set of blood cultures. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort review of adult patients with SLB from at least one blood culture set within the University of Maryland Medical System from November 2015-November 2019. Objectives were to (1) describe baseline characteristics, (2) compare available criteria for evaluating clinical significance, and (3) evaluate the clinical outcomes among patients with SLB in 1 vs ≥2 positive blood culture sets. Descriptive statistics with Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were carried out. Results There were 5,548 CoNS-positive blood culture sets, 49 (0.88%) with S. lugdunensis comprising 36 adult patients (24 with 1 positive set and 12 with ≥2 positive sets). Patients with ≥2 positive sets were more likely to be on hemodialysis (HD) (p=0.029) and to have an HD catheter present (p=0.10) (Table 1). Thirty-five of the 36 patients fulfilled at least one of the following: systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), Souvenir criteria, or clinical criteria (infectious focus on imaging and/or second positive culture site) (Table 2). Twenty-eight (78%) patients were treated with antimicrobial therapy and/or central line removal. SIRS criteria were met more often among patients with 1 positive set (p=0.05). Patients with ≥2 positive sets were more often treated with antibiotics for longer than 2 weeks (p=0.02). The mean time of positive cultures to discharge was 11 days and was longer for patients with only one set of positive blood cultures (13 vs. 6 days), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.29) (Table 3). Conclusion SLB was rare and occurred more frequently as a single set of positive blood cultures. Though limited by sample size, this study found similar patient characteristics, clinical significance and outcomes between patients with one set and those with ≥2 sets of blood cultures positive for S. lugdunensis. Given the potential severity of SLB, it seems prudent to treat S. lugdunensis in a single blood culture, but larger studies are needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals An Evaluation Of Direct Identification Of Pathogens From Blood Cultures By Maldi-Tof Mass Spectrometry

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Lina Savickaitė ◽  
Jelena Kopeykinienė
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Positive Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Rapid Identification ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Direct Identification ◽  
Maldi Tof Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Identification

Rapid identification of the infecting organism may aid in choosing appropriate antimicrobial therapy. We used MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify bacteria directly from the positive blood culture samples (n=21). 85,71 percent of these results was identified using of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Identification time of bacteria directly from the blood culture takes more than 1 hour for 27,8 percent results.

scholarly journals 200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S208-S208
Author(s):  
Jeremy Meeder ◽  
Derek Moates ◽  
Hannah Pierce ◽  
Jamie Hutchinson ◽  
Cameron White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Resistance Genes ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Meca Gene ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Gene Detection ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Material Support

Abstract Background The ePlex BCID Gram-Positive (GP) panel utilizes electrowetting technology to detect the most common causes of GP bacteremia (20 targets) and 4 antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. Rapid detection of intrinsic vancomycin resistance and acquired resistance genes (mecA, mecC, vanA, vanB) enables early optimization of antimicrobial therapy whereas early detection of common contaminants decreases unnecessary antibiotic utilization and hospitalizations. Methods In this prospective study, we evaluated the performance of the BCID-GP panel compared to traditional standard of care culture and susceptibility testing with organism identification using the BioMerieux Vitek MS Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) Time of Flight mass spectrometry. Samples submitted for standard of care testing in Biomerieux BacT/Alert resin FA/FN blood culture bottles on the BacT/Alert VIRTUO automated blood culture system with GP bacteria on direct exam (n=100) were included. Results All GP bacteria were represented on the BCID-GP panel, most tests 97/100 (97%) yielded valid results, 53 common skin contaminants (50 coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), 2 Bacillus, 1 Corynebacterium) were identified, and 7/7 coinfections with Gram negative (GN) bacteria were detected by the Pan GN target and identified by the BCID-GN panel. Discordant analyses revealed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 96/97 (99%) with 1 false negative CNS and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 92/97 (94.8%) with 5 false positives for either S. epidermidis or Corynebacterium. Detection of vanA yielded a PPA of 4/4 and NPA of 9/9. mecA gene detection exhibited a PPA of 14/14 and NPA of 14/14 for S. aureus and a PPA of 31/32 (97%) and NPA of 16/16 for coagulase negative staphylococci with 1 false negative methicillin resistant S. epidermidis. Conclusion Detection of acquired vancomycin resistance (n=4) and absence of mecA gene detection in Staphylococcus species (n=30) represent opportunities for early optimization of antimicrobial therapy in 34/100 (34%) of samples. The BCID-GP panel provides rapid accurate detection of resistant isolates and common contaminants enabling high quality data driven optimization of antimicrobial therapy. Disclosures Todd P. McCarty, MD, Cidara (Grant/Research Support)GenMark (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria for Research Presentation)T2 Biosystems (Consultant) Sixto M. Leal, Jr., MD, PhD, Abnova (Grant/Research Support)AltImmune (Grant/Research Support)Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)Astellas Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)CNINE Dx (Grant/Research Support)GenMark Diagnostics (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria- Research Presentation)IHMA (Grant/Research Support)IMMY Dx (Grant/Research Support)JMI/Sentry (Grant/Research Support)mFluiDx Dx (Grant/Research Support)SpeeDx Dx (Grant/Research Support)Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals (Grant/Research Support)

scholarly journals 608. Impact of Implementing Pharmacist Review and Monitoring of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S365-S365
Author(s):  
Emily R Kirkpatrick ◽  
Elizabeth O Hand ◽  
Darrel W Hughes ◽  
Jasmin K Badwal ◽  
Kristi A Traugott
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Transitions Of Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Laboratory Monitoring ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

Abstract Background Given current efforts to increase the safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs nationwide, this project sought to determine whether pharmacist managed OPAT review and monitoring improves adherence to standard of care laboratory monitoring recommendations. Methods A single-center, retrospective review of patients &gt; 18 years of age who received OPAT from University Health System was conducted. Patients who received OPAT between October 2018 and December 2018 served as the historical control group. After a pharmacist transitions of care program was implemented, patients who received OPAT between October 2019 and December 2019 were included in the intervention group. Patients were excluded if they received less than 7 days of OPAT, completed therapy prior to discharge, or died while inpatient. The primary endpoint was adherence to laboratory monitoring recommendations &gt; 75% of the duration of planned OPAT. Only patients followed by the OPAT clinic were included in this analysis. Recommendations provided in the 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America OPAT guidelines were used to define appropriate lab monitoring. Secondary endpoints included 30-day readmissions. Results A total of 409 patients were included in this study: 198 patients in the pre-implementation group and 211 patients in the post-implementation group. In patients with OPAT clinic follow-up, the post-implementation group was significantly more likely to receive monitoring adherent to standard of care laboratory monitoring recommendations &gt; 75% of the duration of planned OPAT: 42/161 (26.1%) vs. 98/176 (55.7%), OR 3.6 (95% CI 2.2-5.6, p = 0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates between groups in the overall population. Patients in the post-implementation group with OPAT clinic follow up had lower 30-day infectious disease-attributed readmissions: 18/161 (11.2%) vs. 14/176 (8.0%), p = 0.31. Conclusion Implementation of a transitions of care pharmacist significantly improved adherence to laboratory monitoring recommendations for patients receiving OPAT and numerically reduced 30-day infectious disease-attributed readmissions. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document