scholarly journals Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sandlund ◽  
Amelita Bartolome ◽  
Anna Almazan ◽  
Stanley Tam ◽  
Sheryl Biscocho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Testing Procedures ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Stool Samples

ABSTRACT Current tests for the detection of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile free toxins in feces lack sensitivity, while nucleic acid amplification tests lack clinical specificity. We have evaluated the Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay (currently in development), an automated and rapid ultrasensitive immunoassay powered by single-molecule counting technology, for detection of C. difficile toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB) in stool. The analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, repeatability, and stability of the assay were determined. In a clinical evaluation, frozen stool samples from 311 patients with suspected C. difficile infection were tested with the Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay, using an established cutoff value. Samples were tested with the Xpert C. difficile/Epi assay, and PCR-positive samples were tested with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete). EIA-negative samples were further tested with a cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay. The limits of detection for TcdA and TcdB were 0.8 and 0.3 pg/ml in buffer and 2.0 and 0.7 pg/ml in stool, respectively. The assay demonstrated reactivity to common C. difficile strains, did not show cross-reactivity to common gastrointestinal pathogens, was robust against common interferents, allowed detection in fresh and frozen stool samples and in samples after three freeze-thaw cycles, and provided results with high reproducibility. Compared to multistep PCR and toxin-testing procedures, the Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay yielded 97.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay is ultrasensitive and highly specific and may offer a standalone solution for rapid detection and quantitation of free toxins in stool.

scholarly journals Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared to Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sandlund ◽  
Joel Estis ◽  
Phoebe Katzenbach ◽  
Niamh Nolan ◽  
Kirstie Hinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Health Care Associated Infections ◽  
Stool Specimens

ABSTRACT Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common health care-associated infections, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Diagnosis of CDI relies on the assessment of clinical presentation and laboratory tests. We evaluated the clinical performance of ultrasensitive single-molecule counting technology for detection of C. difficile toxins A and B. Stool specimens from 298 patients with suspected CDI were tested with the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT; BD MAX Cdiff assay or Xpert C. difficile assay) and Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay. Specimens with discordant results were tested with the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), and the results were correlated with disease severity and outcome. There were 64 NAAT-positive and 234 NAAT-negative samples. Of the 32 NAAT+/Clarity− and 4 NAAT−/Clarity+ samples, there were 26 CCNA− and 4 CCNA− samples, respectively. CDI relapse was more common in NAAT+/toxin+ patients than in NAAT+/toxin− and NAAT−/toxin− patients. The clinical specificity of Clarity and NAAT was 97.4% and 89.0%, respectively, and overdiagnosis was more than three times more common in NAAT+/toxin− than in NAAT+/toxin+ patients. The Clarity assay was superior to NAATs for the diagnosis of CDI, by reducing overdiagnosis and thereby increasing clinical specificity, and the presence of toxins was associated with negative patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins in Stool by Use of Single-Molecule Counting Technology: Comparison with Detection of Free Toxin by Cell Culture Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Hansen ◽  
Stephen Young ◽  
Alan H. B. Wu ◽  
Emily Herding ◽  
Vickie Nordberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Culture ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Ultrasensitive Assay ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Positive Agreement

ABSTRACT Laboratory tests for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rely on the detection of free toxin or molecular detection of toxin genes. The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay is a rapid, automated, and ultrasensitive assay that detects C. difficile toxins A and B in stool. We compared CDI assays across two prospective multicenter studies to set a cutoff for the Clarity assay and to independently validate the performance compared with that of a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCCNA). The cutoff was set by two sites testing fresh samples from 897 subjects with suspected CDI and then validated at four sites testing fresh samples from 1,005 subjects with suspected CDI. CCCNA testing was performed at a centralized laboratory. Samples with discrepant results between the Clarity assay and CCCNA were retested with CCCNA when the Clarity result agreed with that of at least one comparator method; toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIA), glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) detection, and PCR were performed on all samples. The cutoff for the Clarity assay was set at 12.0 pg/ml. Compared to results with CCCNA, the Clarity assay initially had 85.2% positive agreement and 92.4% negative agreement. However, when samples with discrepant results between the Clarity assay and CCCNA in the validation study were retested by CCCNA, 13/17 (76.5%) Clarity-negative but CCCNA-positive samples (Clarity+/CCCNA−) became CCCNA−, and 5/26 (19.2%) Clarity+/CCCNA− samples became CCCNA+, resulting in a 96.3% positive agreement and 93.0% negative agreement between Clarity and CCCNA results. The toxin EIA had 59.8% positive agreement with CCCNA. The Clarity assay was the most sensitive free-toxin immunoassay, capable of providing CDI diagnosis in a single-step solution. A different CCCNA result was reported for 42% of retested samples, increasing the positive agreement between Clarity and CCCNA from 85.2% to 96.3% and indicating the challenges of comparing free-toxin results to CCCNA results as a reference standard.

scholarly journals High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie L. Landry ◽  
Jeffrey E. Topal ◽  
Joel Estis ◽  
Phoebe Katzenbach ◽  
Niamh Nolan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
High Agreement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Automated Assay ◽  
Toxin Assay ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Testing Algorithm ◽  
Positive Agreement

ABSTRACT The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B (Clarity) assay is an automated, ultrasensitive immunoassay for the detection of Clostridioides difficile toxins in stool. In this study, the performance of the Clarity assay was compared to that of a multistep algorithm using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B arbitrated by a semiquantitative cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). The performance of the assay was evaluated using 211 residual deidentified stool samples tested with a GDH-and-toxin EIA (C. Diff Quik Chek Complete; Techlab), with GDH-and-toxin discordant samples tested with CCNA. The stool samples were stored at –80°C before being tested with the Clarity assay. For samples discordant between Clarity and the standard-of-care algorithm, the samples were tested with PCR (Xpert C. difficile; Cepheid), and chart review was performed. The testing algorithm resulted in 34 GDH+/toxin+, 53 GDH−/toxin−, and 124 GDH+/toxin− samples, of which 39 were CCNA+ and 85 were CCNA−. Clarity had 96.2% negative agreement with GDH−/toxin− samples, 100% positive agreement with GDH+/toxin+ samples, and 95.3% agreement with GDH+/toxin−/CCNA− samples. The Clarity result was invalid for one sample. Clarity agreed with 61.5% of GDH+/toxin−/CCNA+ samples, 90.0% of GDH+/toxin−/CCNA+ (high-positive) samples, and 31.6% of GDH+/toxin−/CCNA+ (low-positive) samples. The Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B assay demonstrated high agreement with a testing algorithm utilizing a GDH-and-toxin EIA and CCNA. This novel automated assay may offer an accurate, stand-alone solution for C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnostics, and further prospective clinical studies are merited.

scholarly journals 2356. Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared with Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S811-S812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sandlund ◽  
Joel Estis ◽  
Phoebe Katzenbach ◽  
Niamh Nolan ◽  
Kirstie Hinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Percent Agreement ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Diagnosis of CDI relies on the assessment of clinical presentation and laboratory tests. We have evaluated the clinical performance of ultrasensitive Single Molecule Counting technology for detection of C. difficile toxins A and B. Methods Stool specimens from 298 patients with suspected CDI were tested with nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT; BD MAX™ Cdiff assay or Xpert® C. difficile assay) and Singulex Clarity® C. difficile toxins A/B assay. Specimens with discordant results were tested with cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), and results were correlated with disease severity and outcome. Results There were 64 NAAT-positive and 234 NAAT-negative samples. Of the 32 NAAT+/Clarity− and 4 NAAT-/Clarity+ samples, there were 26 CCNA− and 4 CCNA- samples, respectively. CDI relapse or overall death was more common in NAAT+/toxin+ patients than in NAAT+/toxin− and NAAT−/toxin− patients, and NAAT+/toxin+ patients were 3.7 times more likely to experience relapse or death (Figure 1). The clinical specificity of Clarity and NAAT was 97.4% and 89.0%, respectively, and overdiagnosis was over three times more common in NAAT+/toxin− than in NAAT+/toxin+ patients (Figure 2). Negative percent agreement between NAAT and Clarity was 98.3%, and positive percent agreement increased from 50.0% to effective 84.2% and 94.1% after CCNA testing and clinical assessment. Conclusion The Clarity assay was superior to NAATs in diagnosis of CDI, by reducing overdiagnosis and thereby increasing clinical specificity, and presence of toxins was associated with disease severity and outcome. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Dual Reporting of Clostridioides difficile PCR and Predicted Toxin Result Based on PCR Cycle Threshold Reduces Treatment of Toxin-Negative Patients without Increases in Adverse Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Hitchcock ◽  
Marisa Holubar ◽  
Catherine A. Hogan ◽  
Lucy S. Tompkins ◽  
Niaz Banaei
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
High Negative Predictive Value

ABSTRACT Nucleic acid amplification tests are commonly used to diagnose Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Two-step testing with a toxin enzyme immunoassay is recommended to discriminate between infection and colonization but requires additional resources. Prior studies showed that PCR cycle threshold (CT) can predict toxin positivity with high negative predictive value. Starting in October 2016, the predicted toxin result (CT-toxin) based on a validated cutoff was routinely reported at our facility. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of this reporting, all adult patients with positive GeneXpert PCR results from October 2016 through October 2017 underwent a chart review to measure the recurrence of or conversion to a CT-toxin+ result and 30-day all-cause mortality. There were 482 positive PCR tests in 430 unique patients, 282 CT-toxin+ and 200 CT-toxin−. Patient characteristics were similar at testing, though CT-toxin+ patients had higher white blood cell (WBC) counts (12.5 × 103 versus 9.3 × 103 cells/μl; P = 0.001). All cases (n = 21) of fulminant CDI had a CT-toxin+ result. Index CT-toxin+ patients were significantly more likely to have a CT-toxin+ result within 90 days than CT-toxin− patients (17.4% [n = 49] versus 8.0% [n = 16], respectively; P = 0.003). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was higher in CT-toxin− patients (11.1% versus 6.8%; P = 0.1), though no deaths in CT-toxin− patients were directly attributable to CDI. Of the 200 CT-toxin− patients, 51.5% (n = 103) were treated for CDI. The rates of conversion to a CT-toxin+ result (8.8% versus 7.2%; P = 0.8) and all-cause mortality (8.8% versus 13.4%; P = 0.3) were similar between treated and untreated CT-toxin− patients, respectively. CT-based toxin prediction may identify patients at higher risk for CDI-related complications and reduce treatment among CT-toxin− patients.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in Stool

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 3204-3212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linan Song ◽  
Mingwei Zhao ◽  
David C. Duffy ◽  
Joshua Hansen ◽  
Kelsey Shields ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Cytotoxicity Assay ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Toxin B ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Toxigenic Culture ◽  
Immunosorbent Assays ◽  
Digital Elisa ◽  
Detection And Quantification

The currently available diagnostics forClostridium difficileinfection (CDI) have major limitations. Despite mounting evidence that toxin detection is paramount for diagnosis, conventional toxin immunoassays are insufficiently sensitive and cytotoxicity assays too complex; assays that detect toxigenic organisms (toxigenic culture [TC] and nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT]) are confounded by asymptomatic colonization by toxigenicC. difficile. We developed ultrasensitive digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for toxins A and B using single-molecule array technology and validated the assays using (i) culture filtrates from a panel of clinicalC. difficileisolates and (ii) 149 adult stool specimens already tested routinely by NAAT. The digital ELISAs detected toxins A and B in stool with limits of detection of 0.45 and 1.5 pg/ml, respectively, quantified toxins across a 4-log range, and detected toxins from all clinical strains studied. Using specimens that were negative by cytotoxicity assay/TC/NAAT, clinical cutoffs were set at 29.4 pg/ml (toxin A) and 23.3 pg/ml (toxin B); the resulting clinical specificities were 96% and 98%, respectively. The toxin B digital ELISA was 100% sensitive versus cytotoxicity assay. Twenty-five percent and 22% of the samples positive by NAAT and TC, respectively, were negative by the toxin B digital ELISA, consistent with the presence of organism but minimal or no toxin. The mean toxin levels by digital ELISA were 1.5- to 1.7-fold higher in five patients with CDI-attributable severe outcomes, versus 68 patients without, but this difference was not statistically significant. Ultrasensitive digital ELISAs for the detection and quantification of toxins A and B in stool can provide a rapid and simple tool for the diagnosis of CDI with both high analytical sensitivity and high clinical specificity.

scholarly journals Design and Validation of Transcription-Mediated-Amplification Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forMycoplasma genitalium

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett Kirkconnell ◽  
Barbara Weinbaum ◽  
Katherine Santos ◽  
Trisha Le Nguyen ◽  
Bryan Vinluan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Mycoplasma Genitalium ◽  
Vaginal Swab ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Clinical Validation ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACTMycoplasma genitaliumis a sexually transmitted bacterium linked to adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes in women and men.M. genitaliumis difficult to culture, and in the absence of validated amplified molecular methods for diagnosis of infection, there is no reference standard available for use as a comparator for the validation of newM. genitaliumdiagnostic tests. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of three transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) tests forM. genitalium, each targeting unique rRNA sequences, for use as a composite comparator for clinical validation of the AptimaMycoplasma genitalium(AMG) assay, anin vitrodiagnostic (IVD) TMA test that targets 16 s rRNA ofM. genitalium. Analytical sensitivity, specificity, and strain inclusivity of all four TMA tests were determined using nine laboratory strains ofM. genitaliumand 56 nontarget bacteria, protozoa, and viruses. Analytical sensitivity of the tests forM. genitaliumranged from 0.017 to 0.040 genome equivalents/ml. None of the nontarget organisms evaluated cross-reacted with any test. A composite comparator reference standard consisting of the 3 alternate (Alt) TMA tests was used to evaluate the clinical performance of the AMG assay by testing residual vaginal swab, female urine, and male urine specimens obtained from 1,400 adult subjects from three U.S. clinical sites. Using this reference standard to establish infected specimen status, the sensitivity, specificity, and overall agreement of the AMG IVD assay were 100%, 99.9%, and 99.9%, respectively. These results demonstrate the utility of molecular composite reference standard methodology for the clinical validation of future IVD tests for this organism.

scholarly journals Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces of Asymptomatic Patients Admitted to the Hospital

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth M. Terveer ◽  
Monique J. T. Crobach ◽  
Ingrid M. J. G. Sanders ◽  
Margreet C. Vos ◽  
Cees M. Verduin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Toxigenic Culture ◽  
Stool Samples ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Low Prevalence

ABSTRACTRecent evidence shows that patients asymptomatically colonized withClostridium difficilemay contribute to the transmission ofC. difficilein health care facilities. Additionally, these patients may have a higher risk of developingC. difficileinfection. The aim of this study was to compare a commercially available PCR directed to both toxin A and B (artusC. difficileQS-RGQ kit CE; Qiagen), an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay to glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH ELFA) (Vidas, bioMérieux), and an in-house-developed PCR totcdB, with (toxigenic) culture ofC. difficileas the gold standard to detect asymptomatic colonization. Test performances were evaluated in a collection of 765 stool samples obtained from asymptomatic patients at admission to the hospital. TheC. difficileprevalence in this collection was 5.1%, and 3.1% contained toxigenicC. difficile. Compared toC. difficileculture, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of theC. difficileGDH ELFA were 87.2%, 91.2%, 34.7%, and 99.3%, respectively. Compared with results of toxigenic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the commercially available PCR and the in-house PCR were 95.8%, 93.4%, 31.9%, 99.9%, and 87.5%, 98.8%, 70%, and 99.6%, respectively. We conclude that in a low-prevalence setting of asymptomatically colonized patients, both GDH ELFA and a nucleic acid amplification test can be applied as a first screening test, as they both display a high NPV. However, the low PPV of the tests hinders the use of these assays as stand-alone tests.

scholarly journals Rapid, Fully Automated Digital Immunoassay for p24 Protein with the Sensitivity of Nucleic Acid Amplification for Detecting Acute HIV Infection

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1372-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Cabrera ◽  
Lei Chang ◽  
Mars Stone ◽  
Michael Busch ◽  
David H Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Acute Hiv Infection ◽  
Acute Hiv ◽  
Viral Isolates

Abstract BACKGROUND Nucleic acid testing (NAT) has become the standard for high sensitivity in detecting low levels of virus. However, adoption of NAT can be cost prohibitive in low-resource settings where access to extreme sensitivity could be clinically advantageous for early detection of infection. We report development and preliminary validation of a simple, low-cost, fully automated digital p24 antigen immunoassay with the sensitivity of quantitative NAT viral load (NAT-VL) methods for detection of acute HIV infection. METHODS We developed an investigational 69-min immunoassay for p24 capsid protein for use on a novel digital analyzer on the basis of single-molecule-array technology. We evaluated the assay for sensitivity by dilution of standardized preparations of p24, cultured HIV, and preseroconversion samples. We characterized analytical performance and concordance with 2 NAT-VL methods and 2 contemporary p24 Ag/Ab combination immunoassays with dilutions of viral isolates and samples from the earliest stages of HIV infection. RESULTS Analytical sensitivity was 0.0025 ng/L p24, equivalent to 60 HIV RNA copies/mL. The limit of quantification was 0.0076 ng/L, and imprecision across 10 runs was <10% for samples as low as 0.09 ng/L. Clinical specificity was 95.1%. Sensitivity concordance vs NAT-VL on dilutions of preseroconversion samples and Group M viral isolates was 100%. CONCLUSIONS The digital immunoassay exhibited >4000-fold greater sensitivity than contemporary immunoassays for p24 and sensitivity equivalent to that of NAT methods for early detection of HIV. The data indicate that NAT-level sensitivity for acute HIV infection is possible with a simple, low-cost digital immunoassay.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Cycle Threshold, Toxin Concentration, and Clinical Characteristics of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Discordant Diagnostic Test Results

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan D. Shah ◽  
Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat ◽  
Kelci Coe ◽  
Erica Reed ◽  
Johanna Sandlund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Neutralization Assay ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Toxin Concentration ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cycle Threshold ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection

ABSTRACT Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common health care-associated infections that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. CDI diagnosis involves laboratory testing in conjunction with clinical assessment. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of various C. difficile tests and to compare clinical characteristics, Xpert C. difficile/Epi (PCR) cycle threshold (CT), and Singulex Clarity C. diff toxins A/B (Clarity) concentrations between groups with discordant test results. Unformed stool specimens from 200 hospitalized adults (100 PCR positive and 100 negative) were tested by cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Quik Chek), Premier Toxins A and B, and Clarity. Clinical data, including CDI severity and CDI risk factors, were compared between discordant test results. Compared to CCNA, PCR had the highest sensitivity at 100% and Quik Chek had the highest specificity at 100%. Among clinical and laboratory data studied, prevalences of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and hospitalizations were consistently higher across all subgroups in comparisons of toxin-positive to toxin-negative patients. Among PCR-positive samples, the median CT was lower in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples; however, CT ranges overlapped. Among Clarity-positive samples, the quantitative toxin concentration was significantly higher in toxin-positive samples than in toxin-negative samples as determined by CCNA and Quik Chek Toxin A and B. Laboratory tests for CDI vary in sensitivity and specificity. The quantitative toxin concentration may offer value in guiding CDI diagnosis and treatment. The presence of leukocytosis, prior antibiotic use, and previous hospitalizations may assist with CDI diagnosis, while other clinical parameters may not be consistently reliable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document