scholarly journals Assessment of Etest as an Alternative to Agar Dilution for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 1435-1440 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Liu ◽  
T. H. Taylor ◽  
K. Pettus ◽  
D. Trees
2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 479-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Sawatzky ◽  
Irene Martin ◽  
Patricia Galarza ◽  
Marıa Elena Trigoso Carvallo ◽  
Pamela Araya Rodriguez ◽  
...  

ObjectivesA Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility quality control comparison programme was re-established in Latin America and the Caribbean to ensure antimicrobial susceptibility data produced from the region are comparable nationally and internationally.MethodsThree panels, consisting of N. gonorrhoeae isolates comprising reference strains and other characterised isolates were sent to 11 participating laboratories between 2013 and 2015. Antimicrobial susceptibilities for these isolates were determined using agar dilution, Etest or disc diffusion methods. Modal minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for each panel isolate/antibiotic combination were calculated. The guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute were used for interpretations of antimicrobial susceptibility. The agreement of MICs with the modal MICs was determined for each of the participating laboratories as well as for each of the antibiotics tested.ResultsFive of 11 laboratories that participated in at least one panel had an overall average agreement between participants’ MIC results and modal MICs of >90%. For other laboratories, agreements ranged from 60.0% to 82.4%. The proportion of agreement between interpretations for all the antibiotics, except penicillin and tetracycline, was >90%. The percentages of agreement between MIC results and their modes for erythromycin, spectinomycin, cefixime and azithromycin were >90%. Tetracycline, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin agreement ranged from 84.5% to 89.1%, while penicillin had 78.8% agreement between MICs and modal MICs.ConclusionsThe participating laboratories had acceptable results, similar to other international quality assurance programmes. It is important to ensure continuation of the International Gonococcal Antimicrobial Susceptibility Quality Control Comparison Programme to ensure that participants can identify and correct any problems in antimicrobial susceptibility testing for N. gonorrhoeae as they arise and continue to generate reproducible and reliable data.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1377-1384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liben Chen ◽  
Dong Jin Shin ◽  
Shuyu Zheng ◽  
Johan H. Melendez ◽  
Charlotte A. Gaydos ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-349
Author(s):  
Rafael Llanes ◽  
Calixto Domínguez ◽  
Alberto Prat ◽  
Claudio Rodríguez ◽  
Eduardo A. Valdés ◽  
...  

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Florian Baquer ◽  
Asma Ali Sawan ◽  
Michel Auzou ◽  
Antoine Grillon ◽  
Benoît Jaulhac ◽  
...  

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes is challenging. Because MIC determination is recommended by both CLSI and EUCAST, commercial broth microdilution and diffusion strip tests have been developed. The reliability of broth microdilution methods has not been assessed yet using the agar dilution reference method. In this work, we evaluated two broth microdilution kits (MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes® MIC and Sensititre Anaerobe MIC®) and one gradient diffusion strip method (Liofilchem®) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 47 Clostridiales isolates (Clostridium, Clostridioides and Hungatella species) using the agar dilution method as a reference. The evaluation focused on comparing six antimicrobial molecules available in both microdilution kits. Analytical performances were evaluated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. Essential agreements (EA) and categorical agreements (CA) varied greatly according to the molecule and the evaluated method. Vancomycin had values of essential and categorical agreements above 90% for the three methods. The CA fulfilled the FDA criteria for three major molecules in the treatment of Gram-positive anaerobic infections (metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin). The highest rate of error was observed for clindamycin. Multicenter studies are needed to further validate these results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document